Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:27 AM Apr 2014

Operation Choke Point- The DOJ using banks to shut down industries they don't like


snip:

Now, news is slowly surfacing that shows the US Department of Justice may be strong-arming banks into banning porn stars.

It’s called Operation Choke Point, and it has nothing to do with deep-throating.

Instead, it’s a targeted effort to shut down as many as 30 separate industries by making it impossible for them to access banking services.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed Thursday, American Banking Association CEO Frank Keating wrote that the Justice Department is “telling bankers to behave like policemen and judges.”

“Operation Choke Point is asking banks to identify customers who may be breaking the law or simply doing something government officials don’t like,” Keating wrote. “Banks must then ‘choke off’ those customers’ access to financial services, shutting down their accounts.”

more

https://news.vice.com/articles/is-the-doj-forcing-banks-to-terminate-the-accounts-of-porn-stars?utm_source=vicefbus
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Operation Choke Point- The DOJ using banks to shut down industries they don't like (Original Post) n2doc Apr 2014 OP
That is the Patriot act at work hootinholler Apr 2014 #1
And this is mission creep at work. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2014 #22
Maybe they'll use this capability to choke off those who "rape and pillage" the environment... CincyDem Apr 2014 #2
If that were really true... Anyone with a pending criminal case would be banned as well. TheBlackAdder Apr 2014 #3
So when banks find themselves breaking the law... Make7 Apr 2014 #4
Law. That's a funny one! Orrex Apr 2014 #6
Can't do that. There would be no banks, just credit unions. L0oniX Apr 2014 #20
Types of High Risk Payments FarCenter Apr 2014 #5
Quite a few of the categories on that list are protected by the constitution 951-Riverside Apr 2014 #16
Constitutional protections do not extend to requiring banks to do business with them. FarCenter Apr 2014 #31
Not when the USDOJ tells banks to shut down accounts n/t 951-Riverside Apr 2014 #32
Even if this is intended for "goodness", it sounds very scary. Would we want a rhett o rick Apr 2014 #7
Exactly. It's thinly-veiled "morality police" serving the agenda du jour. Orrex Apr 2014 #8
OTOH that list pscot Apr 2014 #10
First they came for the bunko artists. (nt) Orrex Apr 2014 #11
+1 Historic NY Apr 2014 #27
+1 (...until DU ends up on that list) 951-Riverside Apr 2014 #30
Yes they should be allowed for ill gotten gain...... Historic NY Apr 2014 #33
No, they should have their day in court. 951-Riverside Apr 2014 #34
Well if you live in as state where fireworks are illegal the Historic NY Apr 2014 #35
The idea of innocent until proven guilty is dead. Savannahmann Apr 2014 #9
No Lurker Deluxe Apr 2014 #23
I'll take anything that Frank Keating has to say with a grain of salt madokie Apr 2014 #12
I'm sure he has his own agenda Major Nikon Apr 2014 #17
+1... IthinkThereforeIAM Apr 2014 #19
Because Terrorists! n/t hughee99 Apr 2014 #13
The answer is obvious FrodosPet Apr 2014 #14
No judge. No jury. No justice. n/t 951-Riverside Apr 2014 #15
HBSC shuts itself down for laundering drug money? L0oniX Apr 2014 #18
My first thought as well BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #21
Sort of curious, that one. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #24
You see what's happened to this fucking country? Enthusiast Apr 2014 #25
First they choked off the porn stars, but I didn't say anything rocktivity Apr 2014 #26
Now where is the congressional oversight on this matter? Dawson Leery Apr 2014 #28
The administration pays banksters who lie and use their positions to steal, and want to jtuck004 Apr 2014 #29

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
1. That is the Patriot act at work
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:40 AM
Apr 2014

All that extra stuff you have to now provide to open an account, lends itself to freezing your accounts when you do something unwelcome by the government.

All large cash transactions are reported.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
22. And this is mission creep at work.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:51 PM
Apr 2014

Here is another case of mission creep:

US Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to a law that allows the US military to indefinitely detain people believed to have helped al-Qaida or the Taliban -
Breaking News headline just now.

Remember that originally we said we could hold people who were Al-Quada.
Now seems we can Gitmo people who we think are HELPING Al-Quada AND the Taliban.
again, no proof needed, no defense allowed.

CincyDem

(6,353 posts)
2. Maybe they'll use this capability to choke off those who "rape and pillage" the environment...
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:41 AM
Apr 2014


...Nah...what was I thinking. Government officials don't "don't like" that kind of activity.

TheBlackAdder

(28,184 posts)
3. If that were really true... Anyone with a pending criminal case would be banned as well.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:00 AM
Apr 2014

The word "who MAY be breaking the law" would encompass many people.

Of course, we're supposed to believe that you are innocent UNTIL proven guilty.

But this does not seem to be the case anymore.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
5. Types of High Risk Payments
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:08 AM
Apr 2014
Although many clients of payment processors are reputable merchants, an increasing number are not and should be considered “high risk.” These disreputable merchants use payment processors to charge consumers for questionable or fraudulent goods and services. Often a disreputable merchant will engage in high pressure and deceptive sales tactics, such as aggressive telemarketing or enticing and misleading pop-up advertisements on Web sites. For example, consumers should be cautious when Web sites offer “free” information and ask consumers to provide payment information to cover a small shipping and handling fee. In some instances and without proper disclosure, consumers who agreed to pay these fees, often found their bank accounts debited for more than the fee and enrolled in costly plans without their full understanding and consent.8 Still other disreputable merchants will use processors to initiate payments for the sale of products and services, including, but not limited to, unlawful Internet gambling and the illegal sale of tobacco products on the Internet.

Generally, high-risk transactions occur when the consumer does not have a familiarity with the merchant, or when the quality of the goods and services being sold is uncertain. Activities involving purchases made over the telephone or on the Internet tend to be riskier in that the consumer cannot fully examine or evaluate the product or service purchased. Similarly, the consumer may not be able to verify the identity or legitimacy of the person or organization making the sale.

Some merchant categories that have been associated with high-risk activity include, but are not limited to:

•Ammunition Sales
•Cable Box De-scramblers
•Coin Dealers
•Credit Card Schemes
•Credit Repair Services
•Dating Services
•Debt Consolidation Scams
•Drug Paraphernalia
•Escort Services
•Firearms Sales
•Fireworks Sales
•Get Rich Products
•Government Grants
•Home-Based Charities
•Life-Time Guarantees
•Life-Time Memberships
•Lottery Sales
•Mailing Lists/Personal Info
•Money Transfer Networks
•On-line Gambling
•PayDay Loans
•Pharmaceutical Sales
•Ponzi Schemes
•Pornography
•Pyramid-Type Sales
•Racist Materials
•Surveillance Equipment
•Telemarketing
•Tobacco Sales
•Travel Clubs


http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/supervisory/insights/sisum11/managing.html

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
16. Quite a few of the categories on that list are protected by the constitution
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:34 PM
Apr 2014

Fireworks Sales & Pornography ...really?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
7. Even if this is intended for "goodness", it sounds very scary. Would we want a
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:16 AM
Apr 2014

Romney Admin doing this?

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
30. +1 (...until DU ends up on that list)
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 01:48 PM
Apr 2014

This has nothing to do with Kevin Trudeau, he had his day in court.

Government shutting down people's accounts or seizing people's property without trial is disgusting. I don't care who the target is, EVERYONE deserves a fair trial in court.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
33. Yes they should be allowed for ill gotten gain......
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 07:07 PM
Apr 2014

apparently you've never been a victim of charlatan.

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
34. No, they should have their day in court.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 07:25 PM
Apr 2014

And not every business on that list are scam related.

Again, firework sellers and pornography ...really?

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
35. Well if you live in as state where fireworks are illegal the
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 09:28 PM
Apr 2014

state police generally sit on the border watching those going and coming. We have people connected to Organized Crime that traffic in them. Possession of more than $50.00 dollars worth is a felony in NY. Out if state Fireworks Business's target residents and entice them via mailings.

Pornography your really joking....it ain't Playboy or Penthouse their looking for. There is international traffic and trade in child pornography among other stuff.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
9. The idea of innocent until proven guilty is dead.
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:33 AM
Apr 2014

I have a friend who works at the local Port with the ILA. He and I were talking, and he told me about the new requirements for the TWIC (Transportation Worker Identification Credential) as mandated by the DHS. It seems that you must surrender your TWIC card if you are accused of one of several crimes. Including Fraud, Theft, and the usual litany of Felonies. He told me he had discussed it with his lawyer when he was doing something unrelated to that, and the Lawyer said that the accusation shouldn't be enough. We both agreed it SHOULDN'T be enough, but apparently it was.

Apparently, in the 21st Century, we can't wait for the conviction, and even the RICO process of the 1980's is just too slow, we must act now, before any facts are in, much less all the facts and the judgement of a jury.

Lurker Deluxe

(1,036 posts)
23. No
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:56 PM
Apr 2014

I have a TWIC card, and the rules are pretty straight forward.

http://www.tsa.gov/stakeholders/frequently-asked-questions-0#disqualification

Conviction for one of the following felonies is disqualifying if the applicant was convicted, pled guilty (including 'no contest'), or found not guilty by reason of insanity within 7 years of the date of the TWIC application; OR if the applicant was released from prison after conviction within 5 years of the date of the application. The applicant may apply for a waiver.

You can not have your TWIC card revoked because someone "accuses" you of something ... we would simply accuse all of our competitors of doing something. Something is not right with this story.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
12. I'll take anything that Frank Keating has to say with a grain of salt
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:52 AM
Apr 2014

He did a lot of damage to our state when he was governor and most of it was underhanded shit. Lying the whole time.

IthinkThereforeIAM

(3,076 posts)
19. +1...
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:41 PM
Apr 2014

... I was thinking the same thing. I would like to see a source other than a Keating tell me what is legal and not legal in the banking industry.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
14. The answer is obvious
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 12:27 PM
Apr 2014

We need the banks to be owned by the government, so that the people of the United States (at least those few of us willing to follow every issue and vote in every election) will control this important industry via management by our elected officials.

Then WE can say "do business with EVERYONE!" (unless a bunch of bluenoses, like religious conservatives and anti-porn feminists end up winning the election, of course).

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
25. You see what's happened to this fucking country?
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 01:12 PM
Apr 2014

This is why—911. This is the reason. The fake elections of 2000 and 2004. And the other stuff too crazy to mention.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
26. First they choked off the porn stars, but I didn't say anything
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 01:12 PM
Apr 2014

because I wasn't a porn star.

Then they choked off the escort services, but I didn't say anything because I don't work for or use escort services...


rocktivity

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
29. The administration pays banksters who lie and use their positions to steal, and want to
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 01:29 PM
Apr 2014

shut down the lives of people who have sex on camera.

Less and less need for the government we have.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Operation Choke Point- Th...