General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssnagglepuss
(12,704 posts)is a jaw-dropper.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)or the one about solomon with 700 wives and 300 whores.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)eShirl
(18,490 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Deut. 15 . If there is a poor man among you, one of your brothers, in any of the towns of the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart, nor close your hand to your poor brother; but you shall freely open your hand to him, and generously lend him sufficient for his need in whatever he lacks.
Deut. 26:12. When you have finished paying the complete tithe of your increase in the third year, the year of tithing, then you shall give it to the Levite, to the stranger, to the orphan and the widow, that they may eat in your towns, and be satisfied.
Lev. 19:19ff. Now when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very corners of your field, neither shall you gather the gleanings of your harvest. Nor shall you glean your vineyard, nor shall you gather the fallen fruit of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the needy and for the stranger. I am the LORD your God.
Prov. 31:8: [Commandment to kings.] Open your mouth for the dumb, for the rights of all the unfortunate. Open your mouth, judge righteously, and defend the rights of the afflicted and needy.
Is. 58:66: Is this not the fast which I choose, to loosen the bonds of wickedness, to undo the bands of the yoke, and to let the oppressed go free, and break every yoke? Is it not to divide your bread with the hungry, and bring the homeless poor into the house; when you see the naked, to cover him, and not to hide yourself from your own flesh?
Jer. 22:3. Do justice and righteousness, and deliver the one who has been robbed from the power of his oppressor. Also do not mistreat or do violence to the stranger, the orphan, or the widow; and do not shed innocent blood in this place.
Luke 12:33. "Sell your possessions and give to charity; make yourselves purses which do not wear out, an unfailing treasure in heaven, where no thief comes near, nor moth destroys."
Luke 3:11. And [John the Baptist] would answer and say to them, "Let the man with two tunics share with him who has none, and let him who has food do likewise."
Mt. 5:42. Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.
There are over 300 commandments about helping the poor in the bible. too bad no one remembers those.
Stan Smith
(97 posts)The jerks on the right could learn a good lesson about being generous from us.
I'd rather pay a little more in taxes and have everyone taken care of then to allow people to starve.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)hand up is a HAND OUT!
He's a bootstraps kinda guy.
He finds my gawdless heathen liberal views appalling.
I love it!
zanana1
(6,110 posts)My sister had the gall to tell me that annoying right wingers is childish and that I should be polite even if they aren't. What kind of fun is that?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)'...Exodus 35 : 2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself or is it okay to call the police?
Here's one that's really important cause we've got a lot of sports fans in this town: touching the skin of a dead pig makes one unclean. Leviticus 11 : 7, If they promise to wear gloves can the Washington Redskins still play football? Can Notre Dame? Can West Point?
Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother, John, for planting different crops side by side?
Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads?
Think about those questions, would you?'
- President Jed Bartlet
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Another brilliant writing job by sorkin:
TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)It's the most brilliant scene from a totally brilliant series, imho. I absolutely love the punctuation "... in THIS building, when the President stands NOBODY sits." He destroys her ... deservedly.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)...but I loved Sorkin's writing even when he was doing 'Sports Night.' Of course, he dropped that to do West Wing. But he tends do do some brilliant writing, whatever he does.
If you haven't seen 'Sports Night,' look it up--it has some great writing and some great acting.
longship
(40,416 posts)Another cringe-worthy Bible quote.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)couple come to our door in order to invite us to their Assembly of Gawd church for a celebration on the death of Christ. He didn't seem too happy when I reminded him that by not having a full beard he was in violation of his beliefs.
I love Leviticus... making fundies squirm for hundreds of years.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)It's this simple. It really is. I have never seen this fail:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12304252
mazzarro
(3,450 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)montanto
(2,966 posts)Mendocino
(7,486 posts)"When you are praying, do not behave like the hypocrites who love to stand and pray in synagogues or on street corners in order to be noticed. "
"Whenever you pray, go to your room, close the door, and pray to your father in private."
I also will include Matthew 7 1.
"If you want avoid judgement, stop passing judgement."
Initech
(100,063 posts)shagsak
(371 posts)is something usually reserved for conservatives. This is completely disrespectful for those of us who CHOOSE to believe that God sent his Son to die for our sins. You should'nt ridicule that.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)game begins in 7 minutes... enjoy!
chervilant
(8,267 posts)I don't think pointing out hypocrisy and contradictions is disrespectful of anyone's CHOICE to believe in any religious mythology.
LaurenG
(24,841 posts)That's a quote from the bible.
TZ
(42,998 posts)advocating homicide is such a GODLY thing to do.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)The relationship with god, or with life, whatever we want to
believe in or call it, is so profoundly personal that I don't
like to waste a minute worrying about others' beliefs or
their opinions of mine. Enjoy your connection with
god & son, don't worry about the rest.
Whoa_Nelly
(21,236 posts)is ask them for their address, because you would love to come knocking on their door on their private property without invitation at any time of the day or night to discuss your personal belief system...and when I state that mine is Atheism, I never see them again.
In fact, I'm pretty sure my door now has a secret mark on it, as none have dropped by for months now.
That's not ridicule, and it is setting boundaries regarding respect.
ThomThom
(1,486 posts)if they set foot on his property.
They don't even come back to our street.
racaulk
(11,550 posts)You learn something new every day.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Not just a few either...I am not sure how it was an insult...but I am always open to new ideas!
Prohibiting newly married women from being slandered, at Deuteronomy 22:13-21
Somehow it is an insult?
dmallind
(10,437 posts)A direct quote from a holy book should not be an insult to those who consider it holy. If they see it that way it says much more about them than the quoter.
Same goes for that hideous neologistic security blanket "disrespect".
The quote does not even tangentially touch the question of whether an omnipotent god sent himself to Earth to be sacrificed to himself to help people he created himself avoid falling foul of a rule he created himself.
If it did, it would not ridicule the idea. The rules of Deuteronomy either apply still or they don't depending on how you understand "not one jot or tittle" and what it means that the "kingdom" comes. They don't ridicule your preference. If they apply to you in your belief, stick to them and be proud. If they don't, ignore them and references to them as anachronisms. There's no ridicule either way.
Do you really "choose" to believe? Could you choose not to believe, say, until 9pm and then choose to believe again? I couldn't do that in reverse.
shagsak
(371 posts)And Deuteronomy was written as the Jews had been exiled to wander 40 years. The rules God gave them to continue their lives were very harsh. A lot of the old testament shows a very vengeful and wrathful God. It wasn't until He sent His son Jesus to earth to die for the sins of man that humanity truly had the opportunity to be saved, simply by making the choice to follow him. And that is the point in the bible where everything takes a huge turn.
That is the TRUE context of the scripture. To portray that scripture in order to ridicule Christianity is (obviously) a COMPLETE misuse of that scripture.
Seriously, you don't see the blatant disrespect in that? I know, I know, you are agnostic/non-christian/atheist, whatever. But what is the point of disrespecting christians? Where is the worth in that? Fun? Entertainment? My choice of faith is not based on a couple of scriptures. I was baptized before I read very much of the bible at all. It is a personal decision that I made in how I want to live my life.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)who don't believe or think the way they do. You've got a huge number of believers in your religion that use the bible to suit their way of thinking. This sign is saying it goes both ways.
That is the point the OP and the maker of that sign was making. It's not about ridiculing or disrespecting the religion.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Either God was right in Deuteronomy, and everything still holds true...
...or omnipotent, omniscient God was wrong in Deuteronomy.
Or maybe the Bible isn't really the infallible word of God?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Fallible mortals? Looks like a lot of laws to me. I am sure an insult is in there somewhere.
hatrack
(59,584 posts)I mean, the guy (sorry, The Guy) sounds like kind of a psychotic asshole a lot of the time, if you take a spin through his holy laws and interaction with his chosen people and his somewhat less-than-chosen people.
31:15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
31:16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.
31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
(31:18) "But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."
15:32 And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
15:33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
15:34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
15:35 And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.
15:36 And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses.
15:2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
15:3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
15:4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.
14:14 And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.
14:15 And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe.
14:16 And he that sat on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth; and the earth was reaped.
Oops! That last bits there's the New Testament!
OTOH, plenty of people do grow more mellow with age once they have a kid or raise a family, so maybe that's what happened.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)The Old Testament is quite clear about punishing children for being disrespectful.
I wonder if those who like to use the OT to support their various outdated views also support the death penalty for disrespectful children. How many of them have put their children to death for talking back?
hatrack
(59,584 posts)I'd expect a more straightforward smiting - lightning, tsunami, earthquake - but hey, if they're in the neighborhood . . .
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the LORD. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys.
LaurenG
(24,841 posts)Does g-d hate little children?
Yes because we all know that when children tease us as adults we call down the bears to maul them and we don't have the bear stop until 42 children are mauled. He must have walked hrough a soccer game or something to have that many kids in one place at the same time
dmallind
(10,437 posts)The Bibles I see in Christian churches, bookstores and homes all include Deuteronomy. There is a truly trivial level of communication coming from any Christian group that eschews either it or the OT in general. Christian churches continue to cite and use OT scripture in services, in press releases and debates, on billboards and signage. If being reminded of what it says bother you, then dump it utterly. Don't pick and choose when it can and can't be used, or by whom, depending on whether it offends modern liberal sensitivity or not. It's either holy scripture or it isn't.
Besides, I can think of several far more "disrespectful" passages in the epistles. Is quoting them "disrespectful" too?
What's the point of pointing out the hypocrisy of Christianity (I'll assume you wrote hastily and actually know the difference between "disrespecting" people, and doing so to ideas)? Because its followers never ever seem to stop wanting to force it into law and societal secular morality. Just follow it yourself and keep it away from impinging on my life and I'll return the favor.
piratefish08
(3,133 posts)has HE been Perfect and Omnipotent for all the ages or not?
Perfection can't be improved upon - either the OT stands on it's own merit or we get to call bullshit.
You can't have both arguments.
NeedleCast
(8,827 posts)You pick and choose the pieces of the bible you wish to accept, and reject the rest.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Perfect!
I refer to it as the "Readers' Digest Version," but Buffet Bible describes it perfectly!
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Education..
You see, there may be some impressionable twelve or thirteen year old reading this thread right now. It's our job to continually show how you don't have to believe in sky fairies to make it in this world. And as a matter of fact, that's how we can finally start moving to a point where humans garner science over mythology.
So, ridicule is one way to help our numbers. So to the kid reading this, it's okay to laugh when you see a bunch of people praying together. They really do look kind of funny don't they LOL
onehandle
(51,122 posts)But when they are using scripture, such as in the current war on women, people need to be reminded that certain aspects are out of date, and should not be applicable to laws or public policy.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)I want to see where this sub-thread goes.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Or you can rent this:
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Sounds to me that you don't have a whole lot of respect for your own religion. If a religion can't stand up to it being quoted, what good is it?
Bandit
(21,475 posts)hatrack
(59,584 posts)mr blur
(7,753 posts)than you can hardly complain when others choose to ridicule what we we see as irrational beliefs and statements.
Where is it written that people have a right not to be offended?
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)just pretending to be outraged because your argument/accusation is stupid beyond belief. I guess God thought it was a good idea to create stupid people.
shagsak
(371 posts)I realize that there are religious nut jobs out there that use God's name to do all kinds of asinine things. And since those are the Christians most people see (since they are high profile) they are usually the ones that define the stereotype we all enjoy. I also recognize that women's rights are in the spotlight, mostly due to religion motivated legislation - which is a totally seperate issue and I have way too much to do today. But I feel that my point has been missed. I am essentially fighting a losing battle - as is highlighted in some of the responses I've received.
So enough of the argument to believe or not believe. Don't believe if you don't want to, it won't bother me. I am a registered Democrat, a Christian and a Texan - I am used to people not listening to me!
I am also stubborn so I will try one more time. The original point of my post was that I was offended at the misuse of scripture - and hence the direct insult to believers. Basically the OP illustrates that anyone who believes this is a moran. Misuse of scripture? Yes. When you publicly display scripture to try and show it as ridiculous that is misuse. The scripture shown was not even scripture at all, it was a summary of a few verses in someones own words. The few verses were part of a very big picture. But you are not seeing that because you are focused on showing it as ridiculous. "HAHA, the bible says you're supposed to kill your wife if she's not a virgin! Wait till those stupid Christians see that!!!11" That's what you are highlighting, that's what you are saying. Deuteronomy tells a STORY about the HISTORY of the Jewish people. Part of that history includes the rules that were commanded to THEM. When you highlight a specific section of that and present to someone who doesn't truly understand the context, and you make it seem like it is supposed to be a commandment by God to that reader, you are misusing that scripture. Sadly though, it was the apparent goal of whoever was holding that board.
I normally really like reading Pitt's posts. But I have my hot button items like everyone, and I will call bullshit when I see it. And that is whether or not you agree with my call.
EOM
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Wow.
shagsak
(371 posts)The intent of the scripture is not to ridicule Christianity, yet that is what the post has done. Do you disagree?
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)If Scripture espouses something evil or stupid or violent or ignorant, it is not misuse to point that out.
shagsak
(371 posts)It's a sarcastic mocking of scripture.
And you either understand why it would be offensive to Christians and don't care, or you don't understand why it's offensive to Christians because you think it is a perfectly rational thing to do (it's what the bible says right?).
And I'm not behind. I am being vocal about something that offended me and debating it with people who don't understand why - which is pointless.
Go Stars!
LaurenG
(24,841 posts)Hello. This is spot on and if you are offended, think of how you are offending all the rest of us by pretending that the op isn't scripture and then blasting us all because we aren't your "kind" of Christian.
I am very offended by your beliefs and you pretend you don't understand why... please.
NeedleCast
(8,827 posts)Just like the bible calling homosexuality an "abomination."
You either accept what's in the bible, or you don't. The quote used in the sign is in the bible and really isn't even taken out of context. In fact, the bible mentions in more than on place that a woman found not to be a virgin on her wedding night should be killed. Stoning is the preferred method of execution.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)NeedleCast
(8,827 posts)A quick browse through Leviticus and Deuteronomy is often scary for Christians who have been spoon fed the "nice" parts of the bible.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)We respect your right to hold whatever beliefs you have...but you can't expect reasonable people to "respect" idiocy.
If you want to believe a 900 year old man collected 1 pair of all the millions of insects out there that's fine. People usually ridicule stupid ideas and thoughts though LOL
Redford
(373 posts)This is not a Christian quote, it is a Jewish quote. See, Jesus never said this and in fact defended prostitutes. It is really frustrating when people who do not know the Bible, have never studied the Bible, and only want to make fun of Jews and Christians take scripture out of context.
I bet you don't have the guts to say which religion this is actually applicable to today? You know, the religion where women are stoned to death for having the audacity to be raped. Yeah, I did not think so....go ahead and make fun of Christians. It only makes YOU look intolerant.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)cuz Christians never ever ever ever ever ever ever quote from the Old Testament.
I mean never ever ever.
Or something.
again. That's twice in one thread. Going for a record here...
P.S. Sweet racism against Muslims and Jews you deployed there. Is there a handbook you consult for this shit?
Besides the Bible, I mean?
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)But you could have been more direct and called out this anti-Muslim BS for what it is. Islamophobia: It's what's for dinner!
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)You did come back more directly, and props to you for that. You're a good man, Gunga Din--even when the stupid makes us a little spacey.
Keep fighting the good fight.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)for the appropriate poke.
Redford
(373 posts)Give me a break....
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)he is criticizing the right wing for being absolutists and using the Bible(Old Testament) to justify their position being against gays marrying.
The point he was making was that if we all did that, we'd find a quote that could be used to justify what we want to. If the right wing is going to quote Bible scripture, Old or new, they better do it with all and be consistent. Get it?
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)I need more popcorn
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Christians aren't any more "persecuted" than any other religion. Especially not in the USA!
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Wow. Just wow.
Again, either God said it and it's still true...or not-so-infallible God was wrong and had to correct himself later. Or, maybe the Bible is just a bunch of stuff people, not a deity, thought at the time.
No matter which it is, how is DIRECTLY QUOTING from your holy book making fun of Christians? Are you saying your holy book makes fun of Christians?
Redford
(373 posts)God did not write Deuteronomy, silly. Most of it is ascribed to Moses as the author. It's HEBREW name is 'elleh haddebarim (These are the words). As his final act in transferring leadership to Joshua, Moses delivered his farewell address to prepare people for their entrance into Canaan. In them, Moses emphasized LAWS that were especially needed at such a time, and he presented them in a way appropriate to the situation.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)God didn't write *any* of the Bible, silly.
You still steadfastly refuse to answer the question that has been posed to you several times: How is directly quoting the Christian Bible "bashing" and ridiculing Christians?
Unless you feel the Bible itself bashes and ridicules Christians...?
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)Did Jesus whittle it down to the 5 Suggestions?
Spazito
(50,300 posts)along with the New Testament. Bibles, at least the ones I am familiar with, do NOT begin with the birth of Jesus, they begin with the Old Testament.
Are you trying to say the God of Israel is NOT the God of Christians? You think there are two different Gods here? If so....wow!
just breaking it down for the uninformed.
Spazito
(50,300 posts)hence my response. You didn't answer my question on both the issue of the God of Israel and the God of Christians and the issue of Bibles beginning with the Old Testament and NOT with the birth of Jesus.
Redford
(373 posts)the Holy Trinity? I'm not being glib, I'm actually asking you if you know the difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament. Do you know why Jesus shows up and when? Do you know if his birth is foretold in the Old Testament and where? Do you know which books of the Old Testament are part of the Torah? Do you know that Christians love the Jewish faith and consider it a major part of Christian faith?
Spazito
(50,300 posts)I most certainly do. Do you know the Book of Genesis, the Book of Exodus, both of which precede the Book of Leviticus and are of the Old Testament. Do you negate those Books as you do the Book of Leviticus as not being the word of God or is it only the Book of Leviticus you renounce?
Do you renounce all Books of the Old Testament that are also included in the Torah as being false? If not all, which ones?
Not that this proves anything but here is your answer re Old Testament and the New Testament:
Old Testament contains 45 Books broken down into 21 historical, 7 doctrinal and 17 prophetic. (The Book of Jeremias and Lamentations are counted as one). The Old Testament is 'before the birth of Christ'
New Testament contains 27 Books broken down into 5 historical, 21 doctrinal and 1 prophetic. The New Testament was written after the birth of Christ with the first Book being The Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ According to St. Matthew which is classified as one of the historical books.
The Holy Trinity = The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost and is notated by making the sign of the Cross upon one's body.
Edited to say: the bottom line is citing direct quotes from the Bible is not nor should it be seen as an insult to true Christians. It is simply stating that which is written.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)is a sin?
Do you believe that engaging in sexual relations with a person of the same sex is a sin?
Do you believe that same sex marriage should be legalized?
Bruce Wayne
(692 posts)If we're sticking to primary source material here, which is the whole point of debating the selective quoting of self-identified Biblical literalists who want to religiousize public policy, then debates about the Trinity are pretty far off topic.
The Philosopher
(895 posts)That's an Israelite quote, although it was dictated to Moses by God, so in the end it's a God quote. The term Jew wasn't used until later, when a bunch of horrible stuff happened to the Israelites.
Jesus also claimed not to want to change that very law, but to see it actualized. Matthew 5:17 states, "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." Here is the wiki link to read for yourself, which also includes helpful hints on how to interpret it in ways that prove you right, that way you don't have to address what God said, and turn from His face and live your life in comfort. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_5:17
By the way, quoting a book you carry into church to praise God isn't making fun of the group who carry the book. So you should probably re-word what your frustration really is or look into what it actually happens to be about.
racaulk
(11,550 posts)Why would Christians do that when Jesus himself never said anything about homosexuality? When that happens, do you explain to them their intolerance in taking scripture out of context, or is your schoolmarmery reserved specifically for atheists?
arthritisR_US
(7,287 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Slap an obnoxious, in-your-face believer around with a few scripture quotes and watch the swift retreat and/or fun ensue.
Julie
BeHereNow
(17,162 posts)Cause that is how HE rolls!
BHN
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Better watch out. Quoting the Bible is apparently only allowed by Christians
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Bruce Wayne
(692 posts)Or one of Richard Branson's employees?
frogmarch
(12,153 posts)A little too long for a sign, though.
Deuteronomy 13:13-17
13 that scoundrels among you are leading their fellow citizens astray by saying, Let us go worship other godsgods you have not known before. 14 In such cases, you must examine the facts carefully. If you find that the report is true and such a detestable act has been committed among you, 15 you must attack that town and completely destroy[a] all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. 16 Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the open square and burn it. Burn the entire town as a burnt offering to the Lord your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. 17 Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the Lord will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you. He will have compassion on you and make you a large nation, just as he swore to your ancestors.
~~
Geesh. Sounds like the Lord your God could do with a few anger management classes.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)The Lord of not fucking around.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)You know we have a Religion Group where you can discuss the ins-and-outs of Abrahamic Law if you like...
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)ithinkmyliverhurts
(1,928 posts)you're trying to show how, via internal critique, the Bible commands other things which aren't followed, which therefore negates the things which are accepted? But, purely logically speaking, this proves only hypocrisy, not that gay marriage ought to be accepted. It simply proves by example that a wife not a virgin should be executed. I doubt you're arguing for that, so let's go to the next step.
You're most likely arguing that we ought to reject a literal reading of the Bible (anti-gay marriage) with a literal reading of the Bible (pro-stoning of non-virgin brides), except that (and here's the kicker) most people have always already rejected your literal reading of the Bible. You can see, I hope, how this is self-defeating. They hope to show that you're only being selective about your biblical passage, which is your very critique of their position. The ball really isn't moved forward here, except to point out hypocrisy. See point #1 above. There are 613 commandments in the Hebrew Bible. By your logic, one would only need to violate one to invalidate all of them. Seems odd. Perhaps we could apply the same standards to all politics. If that were the case, however, we'd all be voting Green or Libertarian.
Perhaps when you're arguing against the way in which the Bible is literally or selectively interpreted, if this is what you're doing, then you may want to to show which passages one ought to select in order to be true to the document. But if one does this, then one is also being selective. And so . . .
Other options? I'd really like to figure out how this approach is effective in demonstrating that anti-gay marriage opponents ought to either 1) stone non-virgin wives; 2) stop being hypocrites (but even this isn't an argument for gay marriage; it's an argument for stoning non-virgin wives, so stop being such a misogynist ; 3) become Greens or Libertarians.
That is all.
Heywood J
(2,515 posts)Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.
Psalms is full of interesting tidbits.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)I know what they are, you know what they are, I could say what they are, but I could get a hidden post and I don't want that.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)chnoutte
(36 posts)There are hundreds of versions or interpretations of the bible in existence all written to give religious legitimacy and support to whatever the men in power wanted to control and enforce.
If the bible is the word of god then there would be only 1 version and it would not be open to interpretation.
If god is infallible than the bible would be a perfect book with no mistakes, errors and 100% accurate and verifiable.
However I agree with shving back it in the fundies faces with their own quotes from the book of fairy tales.