General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Walker's John Doe Case Stopped AGAIN !!! - At Least They Can't Destroy The Evidence... I Think
The appeals court said Randa erred in not first deciding whether the emergency appeal in which prosecutors argued they had sovereign immunity from being sued in their official capacity was frivolous.
In his ruling Thursday, Randa wrote that he was "absolutely convinced that the defendants' attempt to appeal this issue is a frivolous effort to deprive the court of its jurisdiction to enter an injunction."
And...
"Obviously, the defendants are not required to comply with the 'return-and-destroy' aspect of the Court's injunction, as explained in the Seventh Circuit's order," Randa wrote
And...
Check back for further details as this story develops.
From: http://journaltimes.com/news/local/state-and-regional/2c81e982-bc1f-59f0-b1b4-0350591eb6aa.html
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)Like a bat outta hell.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Gothmog
(182,072 posts)The 7th Cir. has reversed this judge before in another political case
The appeals panel consists of Judges Diane Wood, William Bauer and Frank Easterbrook. Wood is the court's chief judge and was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1995; Easterbrook was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1985; and Bauer was appointed by President Gerald Ford in 1974. Both Easterbrook and Bauer are former chief judges.
The same three appellate judges seven years ago reversed Randa in another criminal case with strong political overtones.
In April 2007, the panel ruled that state purchasing supervisor Georgia Thompson was wrongly convicted of making sure a state travel contract went to a firm linked to Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle's re-election campaign.
In that case, in which Randa sentenced Thompson to 18 months in prison, Wood called the evidence used to convict Thompson "beyond thin." The panel acted with unusual speed, ordering Thompson's immediate release from prison.
Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/federal-judge-stops-doe-probe-for-second-time-b99265560z1-258474841.html#ixzz319igJm8C
AleksS
(1,724 posts)Yes, wasn't that just the "emergency" part of the appeal? (I thought the defendants filed an emergency appeal specifically to stop the return-and-destroy portion of Randa's ruling, and are filing a "normal" appeal to deal with the rest?)
Won't the panel consider the entire appeal in a less hasty fashion?
nykym
(3,063 posts)before those horrendous Supreme Court Hallucinations.
couldn't they cite that to preserve the investigation.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.