General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreenwald To Colbert: Next NSA Story Will Make ‘Biggest Impact’ - WaPo (w/Video @ Link)
Greenwald to Colbert: Next NSA story will make biggest impactBY ERIK WEMPLE - WaPo
May 13 at 10:52 am
<snip>
In an interview last night with Stephen Colbert, Glenn Greenwald of the Intercept said that hes working on a story that will have the biggest impact of his various pieces on the modern U.S. surveillance state. I genuinely believe that the story thats the biggest one, that will make the biggest impact and will shape how the events of the last 10 months will be viewed by history is the story on which were currently working that hopefully will be ready in four to eight weeks, Greenwald told Colbert.
And just what would that be?
The targets of spying by the National Security Agency (NSA) in America, said Greenwald. Who are they targeting, for what purposes? Who are these people that they are declaring to be sufficient threats that it warrants reading their e-mails? And what is the pattern of people that theyve targeted? Are these political dissidents, are they critics of U.S. foreign policy, are they actual terrorists? And thats the reporting that needs to be done?
When Colbert asked whether its good news, Greenwald replied that there are some really interesting revelations in there.
Greenwalds work on the NSA based on leaks from Edward Snowden anchored a series of stories in the Guardian that last month won the Pulitzers public-service award (along with The Washington Post). His new book, No Place to Hide, chronicles the negotiations with Snowden and provides fresh information on the NSAs unprecedented abuse of power with never-before-seen documents entrusted to him by Snowden himself, according to the books promotional materials.
Often a feisty and combative presence in his media interviews, Greenwald smiled his way through a compelling discussion with Colbert, who pretended to be outraged by the Greenwald-Snowden collaboration. The comedy backdrop even induced him to go soft when Colbert asked about a hot-button topic: Ed Snowden has revealed national security secrets, has now fled the country, he is a traitor to the United States. Why should you not be prosecuted for aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States?
Greenwald replied...
<snip>
More (w/Video): http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2014/05/13/greenwald-to-colbert-next-nsa-story-will-make-biggest-impact/
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Been lack luster so far.
moondust
(21,286 posts)the next release will be better (and more profitable) than the last, ad infinitum.
randome
(34,845 posts)Oh, I love fireworks. See, we can have fireworks displays and speak truth to power at the same time! What fun!

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Whisp
(24,096 posts)like a good desert.
no Hyping For Profit here, nope nope
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Step right up ladies and gentleman...
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Just sayin.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Metadata records are the 'darkest corners'!
Holy shit, sounds like both Snowden and Greenwald talk to God on a regular basis! Why not just print the truth and let the readers decide? No, no, that's not enough.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Whisp
(24,096 posts)moondust
(21,286 posts)is that due to the wall of secrecy it's next to impossible to get independent verification of anything, so anybody can take a pile of documents and use it to create whatever narrative they like--without end.
The documents themselves may or may not be old and outdated, perhaps largely show pieces to impress generals and politicians and attract funding, relevant to current activities or not. Who knows?
randome
(34,845 posts)But Greenwald and Snowden take things to such hyperbolic extents, that objective is lost on them. They are poor messengers. Everyone has flaws, of course, but these two are not doing us any favors.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Damansarajaya
(625 posts)torture scandal at Abu Ghraib involving children etc.
Ended up a big dud, but perhaps that was because of the US media black-out on the topic.
At any rate, I prefer stories that have an impact . . . not stories whose writers tell me will have an impact at some indefinite date in the future.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)'Intelligence' means stealing as many documents as possible and running out of the country.
'Courage' means printing national security documents without regard to whether or not they have anything to do with domestic surveillance.
I don't know, I think we can do without that kind of integrity, intelligence and courage.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
WillyT
(72,631 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)If you want it to apply, that's a different matter. But it should not be up to Greenwald and Snowden to decide that for us.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
WillyT
(72,631 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)eagerly awaiting clips of the interview.
" Ed Snowden has revealed national security secrets, has now fled the country, he is a traitor to the United States. Why should you not be prosecuted for aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States?
Hmmm...Now WHERE have I heard that before....?
Oh Yeah, from the REAL Authoritarian Conservatives at DU!