So, I tell 20 people to rob a bank?

[imanamerican63]

They get riled up and they do it but they kill someone along the way? 43 jurors would acquit me even if those 43 jurors where in the bank at the time of of the robbery? I think the law would not be on my side?

[Shermann]

1. More like tell the 20 people again and again that the bank stole their money

...and is going to get away with it.

Make no mention of an actual robbery.

[servermsh]

2. Sorry, but any investigation will delay the Mayor's agenda! n/t

[CentralMass]

3. This. They should not have cut a deal and should have called witnesses.

[11 Bravo]

5. And you believe that witnesses would have secured even ONE more Repub vote?

[CentralMass]

6. No, I belive it would have exposed the gravity of the January 6th in greater detail and potentially

exposed the involvement of tRump and members of congress and tRump appointees.

[11 Bravo]

7. I thought that had been made manifestly clear, but 43 Senators were so cowed or sycophantic ...

that they simply didn't give a shit.

[CentralMass]

10. I think the deal was to save them from more embarrassment and exposure of their

complicity.

[Initech]

4. You could also earn points with the jury if you tell them bank employees were among the robbers.

[radius777]

9. This is the way our system works.

Poor people and PoC are easily arrested and convicted, while those at the top like Trump who pull the strings often do little or no time and are in many cases rewarded for their criminality.