Check out Elizabeth Warren's Fundraising Page

[Le Taz Hot]

on Opensecrets.org:

Individual Contributions $43,303,542 (97%)
PAC Contributions $717,408 (2%)
Candidate self-financing $0 (0%)
Other $441,395 (1%)

https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00033492&newmem=Y

Pretty damned impressive!

[Enthusiast]

1. Pretty damned awesome!

[WillyT]

2. K & R !!!

[Hoppy]

3. How does this compare with Hillary's contribution sources.?

[L0oniX]

4. Hillary/Carlyle 2016

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/hillary-clinton-speech-carlyle-group-95763.html

[Le Taz Hot]

6. I'm glad you asked:

Top 5 Contributors, 1999 - 2014


Citigroup Inc $781,827 $773,827 $8,000
Goldman Sachs $711,490 $701,490 $10,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $645,994 $638,494 $7,500
DLA Piper $628,030 $601,030 $27,000
EMILY's List $605,174 $601,254 $3,920

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cycle=Career&cid=N00000019

[Armstead]

8. Now I'm depressed

[Jim Lane]

14. Bear in mind that corporations can't contribute to federal candidates.

I'm no Hillary fan but an unannotated list like this might give some people a misleading impression about her.

Take the Citigroup line:

Citigroup Inc $781,827 $773,827 $8,000

That means that $773,827 came from contributions from individual Citigroup employees, from 1%ers all the way down to the bank tellers. Only $8,000 came from the corporate PAC, funded by contributions from individual employees but controlled by the people who run the corporation. None of the money came from the corporate coffers.

[treestar]

5. Already running for re-election

Where did that money come from? Hopefully not any corporatists.

[Hoppy]

7. Hillary? ----- Corporatists? In the same sentence?

Don't be silly.

[brooklynite]

9. 1%ers make individual contributions as well...

Plenty of wealthy 1%ers gave to Warren's campaign (I know a lot of them). The Wall Street Journal ran a story in 2012 about "Wall Street Lawyers" supporting Elizabeth Warren, picking out my wife in particular.

[Jackpine Radical]

10. $44 mil, almost all of it from individual contributions, in the hands

of a woman who's not--NOT, I say!--running for President.

I guess she's just gonna be the go-to girl for all those impoverished Dem Congressional candidates who need a little boost…

[Le Taz Hot]

11. And stay in the Senate

"where she can be more effective."

[Jackpine Radical]

12. Yes, simple math tells you

that being 1% of the Senate is a much more powerful position than being 100% of the Presidency.

[Scuba]

13. Yeah, that one is the lamest of the lame.