General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat else can we blame Rodger, Elliot's actions on?
So far, the most common culprits I've seen blamed on DU are:
NRA
Misogyny
Mental Illness
White Privilege
Affluenza
Law Enforcement
Elliot's Family
*closet Homosexuality (yes people really blamed his actions on this)
I think Elliot is responsible himself; to blame anyone or anything else is wrong. Clearly he had extreme, dangerous mental illness issues but Elliot still made the choice to stab three people to death and shoot three more to death.
As a society we too often blame everyone and everything BUT the person responsible.

treestar
(82,383 posts)They keep happening.
Gun control would go a long way. Knives are harder and slower to kill people with. This case is interesting for the use of different weapons. He probably did the knife killings because he didn't want the noise of the gun to draw attention. Those couldn't have been prevented, likely, but the gun deaths could have.
stone space
(6,498 posts)YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)Just sayin'.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"Choice" isn't really an issue. That's the basis of the insanity defense.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)He still chose to stab and shoot people.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The insanity defense?
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Say a father walks in on a man raping his toddler, and the father pills the man off the boy and in a temporary fit of I sanity he smashes the rapist's head in with the nearest handy object.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)That seems to be a common delineation that some people make- as though one can't be truly mentally incompetent and make plans.
Common misperception, and I wonder why it's so prevalent.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Someone competent enough to meticulously plan a killing spree over the course of months or years, and then execute that plan, is surely competent to stand trial.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I'm talking about someone clinically psychotic, or having lost touch with reality in one way or another.
Having worked with the mentally ill, I can tell you that's a dangerous assumption to make.
There are people getting along with their lives, dressing themselves, raising their kids, balancing their checkbooks, planning for their retirement.. who nevertheless have firmly held convictions at odds with what the rest of us would consider reality. If you had a conversation with them and never touched on their particular divergence from reality, you'd never know.
These divergences from reality could very well make them unable to evaluate right from wrong the same as you or I.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)I can think of several who match your description whom I've met this month alone. Everyone's world view is a little different, ethically and morally. Many of the people we are discussing, those who appear to love normal lives -- at least on the surface -- are well aware that their actions are violation of the laws. They just don't see them as morally or ethically wrong, and in fact, often they view their criminal actions as morally and ethically righteous, even necessary.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)I find it interesting that it seems to be a commonly held belief that "the truly mentally troubled could never make and execute a long drawn out plan", or some variation like that.
pnwmom
(109,854 posts)People who believe they are being directed by voices aren't necessarily responsible for their actions.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)The overall theme of the manifesto was life isn't fair, not satan told him to do it.
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)You know, his fixation on women was all just pretend-he really was "teh gay"
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Added it to the list
janlyn
(735 posts)Someone with mental illness is most often totally incapable of making the proper decision. You are correct to say that about the other topics used to blame his behavior, but to say that mental illness shouldn't be used, shows a lack of understanding about mental illness and its affects.
There is nothing wrong in saying that his mental issues caused him to commit his crime, because it most certainly did play a HUGE factor.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
quinnox
(20,600 posts)this guy must have really hated the national parks and been anti-environmentalist, as everyone else seems to be using this incident to score cheap points on their pet causes.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)JJChambers
(1,115 posts)I see it here all the time
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Or maybe I saw some term like that on DU recently. Its the idea that when a person has a pet issue that they concentrate on, or maybe are even obsessed over, they tend to see things that happen with that lens as the filter. Kind of like the old saying, if all you have is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)And there's no lack of condemnation of this murderer, neither here nor in society at large.
But the dude's dead now. No more punishment can be meted out against him. As such, it does no good to "blame" him. If we want to prevent similar tragedies in the future, we had better not settle for the simple, easy answer.
-Laelth
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Some guy named Rodger Elliott would probably appreciate a correction.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Just saying.
Pathwalker
(6,603 posts)Anyone but the actual perpetrator, who are somehow mysteriously excused.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)The other stuff is pure BS
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)flvegan
(64,984 posts)Response to JJChambers (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Starry Messenger
(32,376 posts)uppityperson
(115,924 posts)they do and how to possibly try to prevent things in the future is....bad?
I do not see anyone not blaming Elliot but I do see many people trying to figure out why and what and patterns.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Which to me shows a desire not to understand. He'd rather wave his hands & say what happened isn't important. He doesn't even care enough to get the bastard's name right.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Here is Elliot smuggling his friend across the border
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I'm encouraged that DU hasn't approached it as a unified opportunity bash the mentally disordered.
The suggestion that readers are presented with a multiple choice response clearly communicates that there is variation, if not freedom of choice, if not any degree of unique truth possible in available perspectives.
IMO, the possibility that the personal concern or fear aroused, or offense take re culture/society from this event is a matter of multiple-multiple choice is outstanding.
RandySF
(74,266 posts)JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Can we find someone who will blame this on Muslims? Anyone?
How about Clinton? Or Reagan? Come on, any takers?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Can we recognize a connection to racism?
What about when a right-to-lifer kills an abortion doctor. Can we talk about motive there?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Again, some guy named Rodger Elliot would appreciate a correction.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Crunchy Frog
(27,589 posts)And those who enable or excuse it.
But, "because there are bad people" works pretty well too.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.