General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoll: Did you watch all of the NBC Snowden interview? What did you think?
Just curious about how many DUers watched it. I had trouble getting my computer to let me watch it. Did you?
| 16 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| I watched all of the Snowden interview. | |
8 (50%) |
|
| I watched some of the Snowden interview. | |
2 (13%) |
|
| I watched a little of the Snowden interview. | |
0 (0%) |
|
| I did not watch the Snowden interview. | |
6 (38%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)but I don't care very much about what he has to say. The leaks are interesting to me, but his opinions are not, generally speaking.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Edward Snowden? Living in Russia, worlds most wanted leaker of government secrets, Snowden, youd think, would be a huge get for any network anchor. Last night Brian Williams got the scoop and presented an interview with Snowden called Inside the Mind of Edward Snowden on NBC.
Big ratings? They were ok. The total viewer number was 5.91 and the key demo was 1.3. But Inside didnt win its time slot. It was beaten by a rerun of CSI on CBS. CSI had a larger total audience 6.14 million viewers. Of course, the CSI viewers were slightly older, as the rerun scored a 1.1 in the key demo.
How frustrating for Williams et al that not a lot of people cared about finally seeing and hearing Snowden. It didnt help that NBC didnt care very much either. The lead in was a two rerun of Last Comic Standing. They had this big news scoop, and didnt bother to just put it on at 8pm and say Here, look what weve got. Maybe thats why the Snowden interview was also beaten for the night by CBSs rerun of Criminal Minds.
Fiction is better than fact!
http://www.showbiz411.com/2014/05/29/tv-edward-snowden-brian-williams-interview-beaten-by-cbs-rerun
grasswire
(50,130 posts)No big deal.
You know that Cheney needs ds some attention for beating up on Obama.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)of--------->>>>>>>
You must be exhausted.
You've put in a lot of hours these past couple of days. Get some sleep. Comrade Snowie ain't going nowhere, he'll still be in the Kremlin tomorrow, and for the foreseeable future.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)My laptop is in my kitchen. I can clean and cook and flit back and forth with ease. I can see a million dollar view out my picture window and watch eagles and sea lions and bunnies and geese and flowers galore. I can have the TV on as well, and I can converse with anyone else here.
So it's all good. But thanks for your concern.
Snowden won the day. And I have stood up for the Constitution.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)of last night's reality shows than the networks.
The apathy is astounding.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)changed. And no matter how many awards he scoops up in Europe, it hasn't helped him here at home. This poll is from January, and they have continued to decline from the height of the scandal. Outside of privacy advocates, this hasn't hit home as a "kitchen table" issue. You call it apathy, I call it priorities.
Poll: Most think Edward Snowden should stand trial in U.S.
Most Americans 61 percent - think Snowden should have to stand trial in the United States for his actions. Far fewer 23 percent - think he should be granted amnesty. Republicans, Democrats, and independents all agree on this as well.
Meanwhile, 31 percent approve of Snowdens actions, while most, 54 percent, disapprove. Majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents disapprove.
Americans are divided as to the impact on the country from making the NSA program public. While 40 percent think the disclosure has been good for the country, 46 percent think it has been bad.
When asked to come up with a word that describes Edward Snowden, nearly a quarter volunteer either traitor or a similar word that questions his loyalty to his country, while 8 percent say he is brave or courageous or a hero. Just 2 percent volunteered that he is a patriot or patriotic, and another 2 percent say terrorist.
While many approved of his releasing information about domestic spying, they drew a line with regard to disclosures of our global surveillance practices, as did I.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We condemn other countries that perform commercial espionage. But we seem to have been doing it ourselves. Perhaps in self-defense? But if so, we should say so.
We supposedly believe in free enterprise. Commercial espionage does not support free enterprise.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)If Germany was under surveillance, it could be any technical company or the US government.
German technicians are wonderful.
Note that Germany and Japan are two countries that have excelled in engineering and technology. And note also that those two countries bore very little of the financial burden of building up military force within their countries following WWII.
Strange how well the "losers" in WWII have done economically and technologically.
We have the computers. But in other areas, we haven't lived up to our potential. I wonder whether it is because we have been obsessed with arms and military power since the end of WWII.
I don't know. I'm sort of asking. Snowden's revelations indicate that we are expending a greater portion of our resources on surveillance than is really profitable for or beneficial to us.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)I have the same visceral reaction to those two, that I had whenever GWB/DC appeared on my teevee machine. It tests my gag reflexes to no end, cuz I knew if their mouths were moving, they were lying.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)You are missing out if you don't listen to the interview.
It was very interesting, and then if you've listened to Snowden answer questions, you could speak with more authority about disliking him and explain better why you dislike him. If you just call Snowden a liar without listening to and watching his interview, how can I have much confidence in your opinion of him.
If not on this interview, the first of its kind, what is your opinion of Snowden based on? What you have heard in the news? Snippets or full texts of his speeches? What people at work say?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I'm mostly interested in the leaks, and those will most likely be posted and discussed here at length.
Did you watch it, and if so, did you find any of it interesting?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I never thought anything bad about Snowden. I've seen his speeches. But his ready and thoughtful answers to the questions he was asked (not softball at all) really impressed me.
His syntax, vocabulary and thoughts are much more sophisticated than those you would expect from a high school graduate.
In my opinion, he seemed quiet, unassuming and rational. He is no hothead. He is not angry. He is very calm and very conscientious. More than even before, I do believe he acted out of conscience. He can articulate his reasons for his actions very clearly.
He criticizes the NSA for its lack of security and the fact that he could so easily walk off work with documents. I have wondered about that. How was that possible? You would think that the NSA would have everything locked down.
He explains his relationship with the Russian government. None.
He explains that he has no NSA documents and why.
It is a very informative, good interview.
I don't think he realizes how homesick he will get.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)very calculated? That was what I noticed. He was very articulate and I have been supportive of him from the beginning, but I don't feel as if I can get any perception of what is really happening in his mind. He measured every comment.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)again and again repetitively about things. That may be part of his personality. It would explain his facility with computers. He is probably very gifted when it comes to mechanical objects and ideas. He has probably written down his thoughts on what he did many times.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Really a solid young man with courage.
I lived overseas for years. He's got some tough times ahead. I was not in political or other exile but could not afford to come back (or even make overseas calls back then when they were so expensive). I wish him well. He is an honest young man in my opinion.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I watched his body language pretty carefully. He was engaged. Not just doing a job, but engaged.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)far more thoughtful I suspected. Of course I can't read Williams' mind, but that was my subjective impression.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)They want to dominate us, it is a sick way to be governed and the repercussions from the
level of information they have gathered has made any presumption of a working democracy
more elusive than ever.
At least now, we are beginning to get out of the dark.
I hope he keeps talking, I want to know everything he knows.
carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)than any of his critics or his supporters
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)He was not defiant or crowing or proud. He was more or less humbly resigned to having to take up an unpleasant task, something he really did not want to do but felt that he was morally compelled to do. That was my impression.
I wondered what his grandfather did at the FBI, Does anyone know? I don't want to speculate about that but it might explain Snowden's attitude toward the Constitution.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)but read most of it online.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Nothing to see. Nothing to say. Nothing to criticize. Not here. Not today.
betsuni
(29,204 posts)You idiots know nothing of North Korea. How dare you.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)I got the impression that Brian Williams was too. He came across as sincere and intelligent. I had thought he might be arrogant but at least in this interview he was not.
I don't he espoused an opinion that even his harshest critics would take issue with. I can't imagine how someone can work themselves up into a lather hating on him and then not listen to what he had to say.
I fucking loathed Bunnypants. But I listened to the murderous little asshole. It made me sick but I did it.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)They edited down the interview from 3 hrs.. to maybe 25 min. with all the commercials and re-introductions by Williams for the next segment.
When I tried to watch the extended interview at NBC I couldn't get it to download no matter how hard I tried. I have DSL and it sucked all my resources. I'm hoping the extended interview will be on You Tube shortly.
Snowden is very impressive but I'd seen other interviews with him so thought he would be. I wish more people could watch the interview because it's really hard to dislike him or be a hater of him when you see how clearly he speaks and how well he lays out his reasoning for revealing what he has.
Thanks for the post/poll.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)If you find the extended interview on YouTube, please post or send me a link. Thanks.
Like Ellsberg, he seems to have been moved by some inner moral voice. Not as in a crazy voice, but as in the still, soft voice of a conscience.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I thought it was fascinating. Combined with the two Frontlines on the NSA, it made for some pretty interesting TV.
Personally, I think Snowden performed a valuable service. And I thought the interview was fair.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)They won't rerun it, their website is terribly fucked, (But here you go), they won't let anyone air the whole thing online without taking it down, only in 3-minute soundbites, and they plan to take it down themselves at the end of this week. And I'm not someone who torrents stuff, so... and I can't ask friends for a copy because they don't watch TV. I generally wish I could save a copy of news or news clips since if it is coming from an advertising-supported outlet you know you will never see it again. Which means they don't really want to keep the public informed, only entertained for ratings sake. Anyone know a link to the whole thing?
Let me know if anyone can get through the links on that splash page. It at least looks nice even though it is built like an adfarm site.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)I keep trying to find details about the hack, I mean, actual, substantive, details, but it's all vague stuff. I don't think it would hurt to tell us about the hack, especially because he was inside the NSA trying to push for upgrades to a lot of the systems (and he got in trouble for it). Any details would help the NSA close those holes.
C'mon, give me some spy level hack details, please!