General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter Hobby Lobby, These 82 Corporations Could Drop Birth Control Coverage - DailyBeast
After Hobby Lobby, These 82 Corporations Could Drop Birth Control CoverageFrom Notre Dame to manufacturers, dozens of companies were waiting for the Supreme Courts decision in order to opt-out of Obamacares contraception mandate.
Abby Haglage - DailyBeast
6/30/14
<snip>
Hobby Lobby is about to get a lot more company.
Mondays Supreme Court decision in favor of the company and Conestoga Wood of Pennsylvania for refusing to pay for contraception in health insurance affects far more than the 15,000 employees between them. The Supreme Courts decision allows closely held companies (corporations with more than 50 percent of stock owned by five or fewer individuals) to opt out of the Affordable Care Acts contraception mandate. There are at least 80 other companies fighting to be the next Hobby Lobby.
Gretchen Borchelt, senior counsel and director of state reproductive health policy for the National Womens Law Center (NWLC), has been following similar cases for the past three years. She calls the Hobby Lobby decision disturbingnot for the least of reasons, how many other corporations it will affect.
Other closely held companies now have a license to harm their employees in the name of the companys religion, she said. If companies qualify, they can use this decision to make the same claim.
A number already have....
Below is a full list of pending cases filed by companies, nonprofits, and universities challenging the Affordable Care Acts contraception mandate as of June 26. (*= Both Nonprofit + Profit cases):
<snip>
More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/30/after-hobby-lobby-these-77-corporations-will-drop-birth-control-coverage.html
frazzled
(18,402 posts)After all, the costs associated with pregnancy and subsequent child health care far, far exceed the cost of birth control. Extra penalties should be put on policies that don't cover contraceptives just as they are for policies for smokers or older citizens.
pamela
(3,480 posts)For all the reasons you stated and more! there are medical conditions treated with contraceptives that also cost way more to treat if contraceptives can't be used. For example, if Endometriosis isn't treated with oral contraceptives the insurance companies will eventually be paying for laparoscopic surgery, infertility treatment, etc.
I think insurance companies would be well within their rights to charge more for any policy that doesn't include contraceptive coverage.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)My top priority as a voter is elect people that will change the makeup of the Supreme Court from religious corporatists.
Lars39
(26,536 posts)redqueen
(115,186 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)that have nothing to do with pregnancy.
The Supremes have given legal cover for these corporations to inject themselves between a woman and her doctor because of religion.
It really is that bad.
Thanks for the link Willy
IggleDoer
(1,186 posts)A relative of mine just discovered she has the gene mutation that produces ovarian cancer. She just started on the pill to diminish her chances.
I wouldn't wish ovarian cancer on anyone but wouldn't it be karma if a famous RWNJ's wife had a cancer that could have been prevented by the Pill?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)by winning federal protections for women's reproductive heath. That is how you get the American Taliban to sit out elections.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Fuck Eden Foods and the rest of the Christoassholes.
sybylla
(8,655 posts)...and blocking them from federal contracts as well as government grants of any kind?
Let's see how quickly their "morals" and religion change.