Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:28 AM Jul 2014

After Hobby Lobby, These 82 Corporations Could Drop Birth Control Coverage - DailyBeast

After Hobby Lobby, These 82 Corporations Could Drop Birth Control Coverage
From Notre Dame to manufacturers, dozens of companies were waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision in order to opt-out of Obamacare’s contraception mandate.

Abby Haglage - DailyBeast
6/30/14

<snip>

Hobby Lobby is about to get a lot more company.

Monday’s Supreme Court decision in favor of the company and Conestoga Wood of Pennsylvania for refusing to pay for contraception in health insurance affects far more than the 15,000 employees between them. The Supreme Court’s decision allows closely held companies (corporations with more than 50 percent of stock owned by five or fewer individuals) to opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate. There are at least 80 other companies fighting to be the next Hobby Lobby.

Gretchen Borchelt, senior counsel and director of state reproductive health policy for the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), has been following similar cases for the past three years. She calls the Hobby Lobby decision disturbing—not for the least of reasons, how many other corporations it will affect.

“Other closely held companies now have a license to harm their employees in the name of the company’s religion,” she said. “If companies qualify, they can use this decision to make the same claim.”

A number already have....

Below is a full list of pending cases filed by companies, nonprofits, and universities challenging the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate as of June 26. (*= Both Nonprofit + Profit cases):

<snip>

More: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/30/after-hobby-lobby-these-77-corporations-will-drop-birth-control-coverage.html




11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. How about getting insurers to charge MORE for no-contraceptive policies?
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:40 AM
Jul 2014

After all, the costs associated with pregnancy and subsequent child health care far, far exceed the cost of birth control. Extra penalties should be put on policies that don't cover contraceptives just as they are for policies for smokers or older citizens.

pamela

(3,480 posts)
10. I definitely think they should!
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 01:38 PM
Jul 2014

For all the reasons you stated and more! there are medical conditions treated with contraceptives that also cost way more to treat if contraceptives can't be used. For example, if Endometriosis isn't treated with oral contraceptives the insurance companies will eventually be paying for laparoscopic surgery, infertility treatment, etc.

I think insurance companies would be well within their rights to charge more for any policy that doesn't include contraceptive coverage.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. I will personally boycott everyone of these corporations.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:45 AM
Jul 2014

My top priority as a voter is elect people that will change the makeup of the Supreme Court from religious corporatists.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
5. Ugh. Birth control is used for more than preventing pregnancy. Its also got medical uses
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jul 2014

that have nothing to do with pregnancy.

The Supremes have given legal cover for these corporations to inject themselves between a woman and her doctor because of religion.

It really is that bad.



Thanks for the link Willy

IggleDoer

(1,186 posts)
9. Women who have been on the Pill lowered their chances of getting ovarian cancer
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jul 2014


A relative of mine just discovered she has the gene mutation that produces ovarian cancer. She just started on the pill to diminish her chances.

I wouldn't wish ovarian cancer on anyone but wouldn't it be karma if a famous RWNJ's wife had a cancer that could have been prevented by the Pill?
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
6. And this is just the beginning...... thank you.We have to take away women's health as a wedge issue
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 10:54 AM
Jul 2014

by winning federal protections for women's reproductive heath. That is how you get the American Taliban to sit out elections.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
7. Now, they only have to hire men, because "women" (ugh) won't want to work there.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:45 AM
Jul 2014


Fuck Eden Foods and the rest of the Christoassholes.

sybylla

(8,655 posts)
8. How about the Obama Admin revoking their EEOC status.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 12:04 PM
Jul 2014

...and blocking them from federal contracts as well as government grants of any kind?

Let's see how quickly their "morals" and religion change.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Hobby Lobby, These ...