General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone explain to me what is wrong with this math equation or why I just can't wrap my brain
around it? Some conservative was trying to prove the point of how big a trillion was and he used this math equation.
"To put a trillion dollars into perspective; 1 billion seconds = 32 years. 1 Trillion seconds = 32,000 years. We talk of trillions like they are billions, how crazy is that?"
Now this just runs contrary to my senses that a billion seconds would be 32 years and yet a trillion seconds would be 32,000 years!
Anyone want to explain why I am having a problem with this or is the problem wrong? I did bring up the fact that that he was using seconds which turned into minutes that turned into hours and then he said.
"Here is the math exercise....60 seconds in a min X 60 mins in an hour X 24 hours in a day X 365 days in year X 32,000 years = 1 trillion seconds"
jehop61
(1,735 posts)the Republicans always attempt to confuse any issue by citing lots and lots of numbers in their argument. It's a ploy to sound intelligent and act like they know what their talking about. Don't try to understand their math and logic, it's phony!
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)...as opposed to meaningless thought exercises, you find interesting results.
For example, the US spends 10% less than other developed nations on its people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending#Government_spending_as_a_percentage_of_GDP
LiberalFighter
(50,856 posts)Also, the numbers to shut down the need for smaller government.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Use math. A trillion is a thousand billions.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)in the US anyway.
60*60*24*365*32 is a little more than a billion. 1,009,152,000
a trillion is 1,000 times that so yes, 32,000 years is close enough. For government work anyway.
Maraya1969
(22,474 posts)There is something about this math equation that is a trick question. Remember when we were told to check our work to make sure it made sense. To think that none of us will never live a thousand billion seconds just does not make sense to me.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)what happens when you multiply by a thousand.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)JHB
(37,158 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)But I don't have time to tell you.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)It's the ultimate question isn't it...
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)as the math is about right...
sP
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Pretty soon you're talking real money.
h/t Everett Dirksen..
"Now this just runs contrary to my senses that a billion seconds would be 32 years and yet a trillion seconds would be 32,000 years!"
Isn't that what he just said?
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)the math whiz from the quotes got it right...
sP
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)purpose to to begin with.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Do the equation, count the zeros.
He's right, but it's a rather meaningless exercise.
The GDP of the planet is $63 trillion. The US Federal budget is only about 6% of global GDP. The US military budget is 1% of global GDP.
Of the US budget only $650 billion or so is actually discretionary if you exclude the Department of Defense which itself is close to $700 billion.
Yes, that's right, outside of mandatory spending which pays for itself (Medicare, Social Security), stuff like welfare, national science foundation, and the like, we spend more on military spending than anything else.
And it gets even more interesting when you think that, out of all that spending, the United States accounts for a whole 23% of the ENTIRE EARTHS GDP.
Basically the guy is telling you we should become developing world level of development again.
And in truth, that's what they want.
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)If someone in the neighborhood had no health insurance for his family, the kids went hungry, he couldn't keep the bill collectors at bay, but he kept spending 15% of his salary at the local gun store and kept giving another big chunk of change to the richest man in town (the evangelist at the mega-church), the rest of the neighbors would think he needs to be committed.
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)How does converting dollars to time do that at only a penny per second? Wouldn't at least minimum wage work better to grapple with the relationship between dollars and time?
Or why not use distance? Not a trillion miles, but a trillion feet, or inches? It's such a bogus comparison, IMO.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)"Now this just runs contrary to my senses that a billion seconds would be 32 years and yet a trillion seconds would be 32,000 years!"
A trillion is a thousand billion, so if a billion years is X seconds, then a trillion years is X thousand seconds.
Maraya1969
(22,474 posts)If we assume that the first year is a leap year, then there will be 242 leap years in those 1000 years, and 758 non-leap years (leap years happen every 4 years, but do not happen every 100 years - only every 400 years).
So the total seconds in leap years:
60*60*24*366*242 = 7,652,620,800
And for non-leap years:
60*60*24*365*758 = 23,904,288,000
Giving a total of:
31556908800 (3.15569088 x 1010) seconds in 1000 years
So it is no where near 32,000 years. You hit a trillion in a thousand years.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)60*60*24*365.25 = 31.5 million seconds per year.
1*10^9 (billion) / 31.5 *10^6 (million) = 31.7 years.
one trillion is 1000 billion, so 31,700 years for one trillion seconds.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Close enough for government work.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)the reality of a billion. It is an abstract and so we quickly lose the scale.
I had a chemistry Professor that tried to give us some sense of this by showing us 1 million, 1mm squares. The banner required 2 students to carry out and unfold and it covered the whole front wall of the lab.
A billion is a thousand of those, and so on.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,318 posts)then you are seriously math challenged.