The Cost of Iraq War Immunity
from Consortium News:
The Cost of Iraq War Immunity
July 5, 2014
If Official Washington were not the corrupt and dangerous place that it is, the architects and apologists for the Iraq War would have faced stern accountability. Instead, they are still around holding down influential jobs, making excuses and guiding the world into more wars, as ex-CIA analyst Paul R. Pillar notes.
By Paul R. Pillar
The Iraq War, as Heather Marie Stur tells us, should not be lumped together with the Vietnam War as blindly and repeatedly as many seem wont to do. Although the two military expeditions both rank among the costliest blunders in American history, there are indeed many differences between the two.
Stur is correct to emphasize differences over similarities, but she completely misses the most significant differences significant partly because of their implications for avoiding similar blunders in the future.
Difference number one sets the invasion of Iraq in 2003 apart not only from the intervention in Vietnam but from almost every other substantial use of U.S. military force. There was no policy process leading to the decision to launch the war.
Whether invading Iraq was a good idea was never on the agenda of any meeting of policymakers, and never the subject of any options paper. Thus no part of the national security bureaucracy had any opportunity to weigh in on that decision (as distinct from being called on to help sell that decision to the public). .......................(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/05/the-cost-of-iraq-war-immunity/