Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:11 AM Jul 2014

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Segami) on Mon Jul 7, 2014, 03:52 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

92 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Segami Jul 2014 OP
That could be good or bad. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #1
I've not seen that Hillary supports much of the first paragraph pipoman Jul 2014 #4
Well, since Obama started negotiations from the middle, I guess that means Hillary ... Scuba Jul 2014 #2
Really, considering all the times they've reached out to us. Octafish Jul 2014 #3
LMFAO +1 L0oniX Jul 2014 #48
When Obama took office he bent over backward to woo the fucking republicans liberal N proud Jul 2014 #5
+1 Segami Jul 2014 #6
pfffttt! Stellar Jul 2014 #21
Trying to figure out ways to pay the mortagageS on her houseS...y'know...being so poor and all that. truebrit71 Jul 2014 #24
Christ, Obama bent so far backward for republicans, I thought he had switched parties. And RKP5637 Jul 2014 #32
but just a little harder and we'll make some real progress! reddread Jul 2014 #85
In a world that made sense, this would foreclose her candidacy. morningfog Jul 2014 #7
In a world that made sense R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2014 #78
Woo... pipoman Jul 2014 #8
We should not be negotiating with terrorists Takket Jul 2014 #9
Personally, I believe that Obama "reached out" to Republicans more than he should have. nt ladjf Jul 2014 #10
"...In talking up her husband's ability to work with Republicans,.. Segami Jul 2014 #11
who is she trying to woo making statements like this ? Duppers Jul 2014 #74
Hillary Robbins Jul 2014 #12
Read the article. Doesn't seem to say what you are promoting from it. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #29
Huh? ProfessorGAC Jul 2014 #46
Makes perfect sense to anyone who has followed Hillary for a while. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #49
I Read The Article Too ProfessorGAC Jul 2014 #73
Trimming entitlements and a consensus on income inequality. Ichingcarpenter Jul 2014 #13
Cutting back on "future entitlements" means no more wars. Think that will happen? L0oniX Jul 2014 #43
Right... nt Mnemosyne Jul 2014 #14
Parsing her every freaking word and sentence for "meaning"........it is a sickness,,,,, Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #15
Well, if she would speak like a human instead of a Cautiobn Machine that wouldn;t be necessary Armstead Jul 2014 #20
Every human has the same habit, words and sentences always can be variously interpreted. Always. Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #23
True, but some more than others Armstead Jul 2014 #31
not every person has studied at Bill Clinton's dojo of triangulation, however. frylock Jul 2014 #89
You mean like Bill Clinton did with the word "is"? L0oniX Jul 2014 #44
Yes, embrace a system based on diametric opposition whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #16
Yes ...let's just have one party. The Center Party. L0oniX Jul 2014 #34
No, just the left party :) whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #55
Had enough centrists yet? marmar Jul 2014 #17
I'm still tryig to forgive Bill Clinton for racist remarks in 2008. Stellar Jul 2014 #18
No one wins the presidency by running as a clone of the current President. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #19
Why not go more progressive instead of doubling down with the right? whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #22
Did you miss the part in the thread that said this was about Hilary Clinton? truebrit71 Jul 2014 #26
Nothing about this piece has anything to do with "doubling down with the right". NCTraveler Jul 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author conservaphobe Jul 2014 #28
Political common sense. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #25
In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them Armstead Jul 2014 #38
"In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them" NCTraveler Jul 2014 #84
Who is winning? Armstead Jul 2014 #86
This is based off of ideology. When one person wins, another loses, most don't care. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #88
I don't know how that translates to: conservaphobe Jul 2014 #40
It doesn't. Plus it's the WSJ, which is being overlooked in this thread. Demit Jul 2014 #54
"Political common sense" also says that supply-side economics works like a charm Scootaloo Jul 2014 #83
Yes ...Dinos should join with Rinos and create their own party. The Center Party. L0oniX Jul 2014 #30
Or We can call it 'The Goldman Sachs Party' Ichingcarpenter Jul 2014 #41
The Center Party makes it more anon. Anyone can payola to it. L0oniX Jul 2014 #45
Since congress is grid locked do you suppose.......... nolabels Jul 2014 #58
She's taking away a right-wing talking point. 6000eliot Jul 2014 #33
and there are people here who want to vote for this dumb ass? bowens43 Jul 2014 #35
oh,dear lord...People are "really, really nervous" about their future, antigop Jul 2014 #36
So she reaffirms support for more foreign workers at the expense of unemployed Americans? Generic Other Jul 2014 #59
How H-1B Visas Are Screwing Tech Workers antigop Jul 2014 #63
Hillary be cautious. If you give a Republican an inch they will take a yard. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #37
They will "they will take a yard" and tell everyone to "get off my lawn". L0oniX Jul 2014 #47
The games people play... Faux pas Jul 2014 #39
There she is in the photo sitting next to 9ui11iani corkhead Jul 2014 #42
Now we can see why her poll numbers are dropping Larkspur Jul 2014 #50
The stoopid, it burns Kelvin Mace Jul 2014 #51
Perhaps, she can team up with the Repubs and vote for another war. Broward Jul 2014 #52
She's never been my primary choice ever any way. Xyzse Jul 2014 #53
"more assertive stance toward global crises" = More War! Xithras Jul 2014 #56
It's Bill speaking -- since he is the Shadow Presidential Candidate... KoKo Jul 2014 #57
Great now Hillary is tearing down Obama instead of helping Democrats get elected this year awake Jul 2014 #60
If by woo they mean hootinholler Jul 2014 #61
The headline is misleading. Nowhere does she actually say this in the article. Metric System Jul 2014 #62
wall street journal - more murdoch bullshit rurallib Jul 2014 #64
the WSJ is imagining the part about the wooing Enrique Jul 2014 #65
Maybe she should run as a Republican and promise to "reach out" to Democrats. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #66
At her hart she is still the board member of Wall mart awake Jul 2014 #69
Hillary has a short memory. Frustratedlady Jul 2014 #67
The article doesn't even quote her. It's BS speculation from the WSJ. Metric System Jul 2014 #71
Looks more like okay lets creates news... Historic NY Jul 2014 #68
Why reach out to a Republican party that's in the toilet? Oilwellian Jul 2014 #70
The more she says, the more queasy I get. Union Scribe Jul 2014 #72
Hillary Clinton Harmony Blue Jul 2014 #75
Can you give an example of her good strategy working in the past awake Jul 2014 #77
you forgot the tag reddread Jul 2014 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #76
you're being played bigtree Jul 2014 #79
Or unless you vote for a true liberal in economics and representation, mmonk Jul 2014 #80
Make sure you read to the bottom of the WSJ article.... DonViejo Jul 2014 #81
Hillary is not my first choice, and crap like this... abakan Jul 2014 #82
Nonsense. Orsino Jul 2014 #90
This attitude is why our country is headed down the toilet DJ13 Jul 2014 #91
I have a firm policy. I never pay any attention to anything the WSJ spews. retread Jul 2014 #92

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. That could be good or bad.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:18 AM
Jul 2014

If she means reach out more to average Republican voters, who, according to the polls, want higher minimum wages, more control over their own lives, not to be spied upon, not to have government shoving itself into their uteri, less war, and so, on, great, fine, wonderful.

If she means reach out more to Republican Congressman who are generally total asses who ignore every single poll that shows the American public is far more liberal than those Congressmen, then that sucks.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
4. I've not seen that Hillary supports much of the first paragraph
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:34 AM
Jul 2014
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. Well, since Obama started negotiations from the middle, I guess that means Hillary ...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:34 AM
Jul 2014

... will just adopt their policies whole-cloth. Why am I not surprised?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Really, considering all the times they've reached out to us.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:34 AM
Jul 2014

It'd be the neighborly thing to do.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
48. LMFAO +1
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:38 AM
Jul 2014

liberal N proud

(61,194 posts)
5. When Obama took office he bent over backward to woo the fucking republicans
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:38 AM
Jul 2014

I think he has done more than anyone should expect considering their scorched earth mentality denying anything Obama proposes or supports.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
6. +1
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:39 AM
Jul 2014

...But Hillary thinks that wasn't enough.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
21. pfffttt!
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:12 AM
Jul 2014

Where the hell has she been?

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
24. Trying to figure out ways to pay the mortagageS on her houseS...y'know...being so poor and all that.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:19 AM
Jul 2014

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
32. Christ, Obama bent so far backward for republicans, I thought he had switched parties. And
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:25 AM
Jul 2014

Hilary thinks that was not enough? Like WTF, WTF is she trying to say.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
85. but just a little harder and we'll make some real progress!
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:58 PM
Jul 2014

Now, SQUEAL LIKE A PIG!

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. In a world that made sense, this would foreclose her candidacy.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:39 AM
Jul 2014
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
78. In a world that made sense
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:59 PM
Jul 2014

the Left wouldn't be the new Right.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
8. Woo...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:40 AM
Jul 2014
Hillary Clinton has begun distancing herself from President Barack Obama, suggesting that she would do more woo...

There. .fixed it...

Takket

(23,705 posts)
9. We should not be negotiating with terrorists
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 08:52 AM
Jul 2014

ladjf

(17,320 posts)
10. Personally, I believe that Obama "reached out" to Republicans more than he should have. nt
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:04 AM
Jul 2014
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
11. "...In talking up her husband's ability to work with Republicans,..
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:14 AM
Jul 2014
...Hillary Clinton made an observation last week that some have interpreted as a veiled criticism of President Obama.

The former secretary of state said at an event in Colorado that even though he faced a toxic political environment, former President Bill Clinton continually extended a hand to Republicans on Capitol Hill.

"My husband had some really serious problems with the Congress when he was in office," Hillary Clinton said, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal. "They shut down the government twice. They impeached him once. So it was not the most pleasant of atmospheres. But I will say this: Bill never stopped reaching out to them."


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-distancing-obama-bill-never-stopped-reaching-out




Its easy when you have republican blood running through your veins....

Duppers

(28,469 posts)
74. who is she trying to woo making statements like this ?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:35 PM
Jul 2014

Rethugian women?

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
12. Hillary
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:24 AM
Jul 2014

She keeps proving my waryness on her is justified.

Obama's problem was not reaching out enough to republicans? What world Is she and her defenders living on?

Obama bent over backwords to get republican support.Many of those who supported him disagreed with that.

Working with tea party Isn't going to acheive democratic party goals.

Obama has had to deal with racists who say no to him on anything even things they used to support.

Republicans will go anti-women with her. While she Is white she Is women threating them.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
29. Read the article. Doesn't seem to say what you are promoting from it.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:23 AM
Jul 2014

Please don't let your "waryness" come from a lack of reading comprehension or just simply being fooled by an opinion piece. No major Obama supporter with limited intelligence would be against Hillary. They are two peas in a pod. Hillary with a little more fight.

ProfessorGAC

(76,647 posts)
46. Huh?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:36 AM
Jul 2014

You say Hillary has a little more fight in a discussion about an article where she says she would be more conciliatory?

That makes very little sense.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
49. Makes perfect sense to anyone who has followed Hillary for a while.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:39 AM
Jul 2014

The article, other than opinion, doesn't really rise to the claim being made. I really wish people would read it.

ProfessorGAC

(76,647 posts)
73. I Read The Article Too
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:25 PM
Jul 2014

The fact that is an opinion doesn't seem relevant. Every opinion needs to be fully supported by facts in every case? Sorry, i can't buy that.

My opinion of Silverspoon Bush is based upon facts, but his supporters would see those same facts as the reason to support him.

How do you square that using the logic you're applying?

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
13. Trimming entitlements and a consensus on income inequality.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:32 AM
Jul 2014

Hillary last October on trimming entitlements

Leading liberal groups are watching closely to see if Clinton will join their charge of expanding entitlements. Last year, she even appeared to flirt with supporting the idea of trimming entitlements to attain a grand budget bargain. Speaking at Colgate University last October, she said:

"What has worked is a compromise where yes, we raise revenues for a certain period, we go and look at entitlements to see what is fair and can be done without really disadvantaging either existing beneficiaries or people who are going to rely on those programs."


June 30th 2014 on growing income inequality in the US

The former Secretary of State acknowledged the gap, but failed to offer up a substantive solution.

She called for a "concerted effort" built around "consensus," she warned that "it will only get worse" if left unaddressed, and she attempted to feel the pain of the malaise by channeling a whim of emotion of those hurting.

"They feel like they're falling behind. At best, maybe they're running in place," she said.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/run-2016/2014/06/30/hillary-clinton-has-an-answer-for-hobby-lobby-not-income-inequality

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
43. Cutting back on "future entitlements" means no more wars. Think that will happen?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:33 AM
Jul 2014

Maybe the idiots in charge should think about the entitlements for those that have served and how that comes to be. Stop the fucking wars and that will at least stop the creation of more people receiving entitlements. Oh ...and this "consensus" IMO is just another term for "ganging up on the weak".

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
14. Right... nt
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:33 AM
Jul 2014

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
15. Parsing her every freaking word and sentence for "meaning"........it is a sickness,,,,,
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:48 AM
Jul 2014
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
20. Well, if she would speak like a human instead of a Cautiobn Machine that wouldn;t be necessary
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:12 AM
Jul 2014

She has a habit of saying things in ways that are (deliberatly) open to varying interpretations instead o just speaking plainly. It's the Third Way way.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
23. Every human has the same habit, words and sentences always can be variously interpreted. Always.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:18 AM
Jul 2014
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
31. True, but some more than others
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:24 AM
Jul 2014

It's not only her. She represents a certain type of Democratic messaging --a political way of speaking to add layers of complexity and ambiguity to avoid getting pinned down.

That's one reason I like Bernie Sanders so much. Agree or disagree with him, but you generally know that what is is saying is what he is really thinking, and you don't have to analyze...And if you have any questions or want any clarifications, he's happy to answer.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
89. not every person has studied at Bill Clinton's dojo of triangulation, however.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:51 PM
Jul 2014
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
44. You mean like Bill Clinton did with the word "is"?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:34 AM
Jul 2014

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
16. Yes, embrace a system based on diametric opposition
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 09:58 AM
Jul 2014

under the bullshit notion that it's somehow best for a plurality, and ride it to nowhere. GOTV!

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
34. Yes ...let's just have one party. The Center Party.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:26 AM
Jul 2014

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
55. No, just the left party :)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:58 AM
Jul 2014

marmar

(79,703 posts)
17. Had enough centrists yet?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:01 AM
Jul 2014

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
18. I'm still tryig to forgive Bill Clinton for racist remarks in 2008.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jul 2014
The strategy could help Mrs. Clinton tackle one of her biggest challenges if she decides to run: how to separate herself from Mr. Obama without alienating Democrats and Obama supporters.


To late, I'm done. She wouldn't want to hurt the feelings of others in the GOtP, now would she. Besides, she already one step up on him in the election...she's white, that should buy her some time.
 

conservaphobe

(1,284 posts)
19. No one wins the presidency by running as a clone of the current President.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jul 2014

Politics 101.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
22. Why not go more progressive instead of doubling down with the right?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:14 AM
Jul 2014
 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
26. Did you miss the part in the thread that said this was about Hilary Clinton?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:20 AM
Jul 2014
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
27. Nothing about this piece has anything to do with "doubling down with the right".
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:20 AM
Jul 2014

Did you read it?

Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #22)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
25. Political common sense.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:19 AM
Jul 2014

"Mrs. Clinton said Mr. Obama has "worked so hard and reached out so often, and it gets discouraging because you don't feel like you're getting much back." She added: "I don't think you can ever stop. And I think that's part of whoever the next president is just has to be ready to do.""

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
38. In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:28 AM
Jul 2014

The current GOP is never, ever going to give an inch. The only way to deal with that is to directly challenge them, work around them, and offer the public a clear liberal alternative that calls them out on their bullshit.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
84. "In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them"
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:55 PM
Jul 2014

Not even close.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
86. Who is winning?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jul 2014

Look at the direction the country has taken in terms of actual policies and power over the last 30 years.

The unyielding and uncompromising GOP Conservatives are far ahead o the game, while compromising Democrats are trying to play catch up constantly.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
88. This is based off of ideology. When one person wins, another loses, most don't care.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:35 PM
Jul 2014

You made a claim, about a quote, that wasn't based on the quote itself. Now you have gone in a different direction.

Since this is all for amusement, here it goes.

Who is winning? Depends. Fights are won on both(the fact that the word both can be used in this country says a lot on its own) sides every single day. Some womens rights are going backwards. Some progressing. Many civil rights are marching forward. Some are regressing. The only area where true advancement can't be seen is with the economic system. That won't happen in my lifetime. Tweaks and minor changes are made, all while keeping the fundamental structure in place.

"Look at the direction the country has taken in terms of actual policies and power over the last 30 years. "

Not possible with black and white thinking. This is a big picture game and always will be.

 

conservaphobe

(1,284 posts)
40. I don't know how that translates to:
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:29 AM
Jul 2014

"Hillary Suggests Obama's Problem Is... NOT REACHING OUT To Republicans?"

Thread title is bullshit.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
54. It doesn't. Plus it's the WSJ, which is being overlooked in this thread.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:55 AM
Jul 2014

Their opinion page is rabidly Republican. WSJ loves to distort & mislead. And be shit-stirrers for divided Dems.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
83. "Political common sense" also says that supply-side economics works like a charm
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:53 PM
Jul 2014

I don't elect Democrats with the hope that they'll sell out to Republicans. I elect Democrats with the hope that they will overpower the Republicans and bludgeon good, solid left / liberal policy through despite the Republican's mewling protests.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
30. Yes ...Dinos should join with Rinos and create their own party. The Center Party.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:24 AM
Jul 2014
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
45. The Center Party makes it more anon. Anyone can payola to it.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:36 AM
Jul 2014

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
58. Since congress is grid locked do you suppose..........
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:08 AM
Jul 2014

There might be some halfhearted attempt to keep the stratification going with social, justice and equal rights issues. Like except for the more brain dead in population, pretty much everybody agrees that the Billionaires are taking us for a ride. The hobby-lobby ruling, the racial divides with immigration and maybe a few others are being used for a backdrop.

The people who have a lots of money have many weak points when economics are the issue. To deal with it this ole slight of hand to trick to change the subject. The billionaires have all the resources they could ever dream of and the largest megaphone, why wouldn't they at least try to muffle the subject about economic fairness with it all? Most anyone can tell the stooges they have set up on the republican side have a poorer chance taking the POTUS position. Investing in Hilary as much as possible with out being too obvious would seem like a good plan to me on many fronts. Muddy the waters always make good sense if you are trying to confuse people to what the real issues are wouldn't it seem?

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)
33. She's taking away a right-wing talking point.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:25 AM
Jul 2014

Very skillfully, I might add.

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
35. and there are people here who want to vote for this dumb ass?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:26 AM
Jul 2014

antigop

(12,778 posts)
36. oh,dear lord...People are "really, really nervous" about their future,
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jul 2014

Hillary Clinton reaffirms support for more H-1B visas



Well, gee, maybe if our jobs weren't replaced by H-1B visaholders we wouldn't be so "nervous" about our future.

Generic Other

(29,080 posts)
59. So she reaffirms support for more foreign workers at the expense of unemployed Americans?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:13 AM
Jul 2014

These politicians are so out of touch with the actual electorate.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
63. How H-1B Visas Are Screwing Tech Workers
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:28 AM
Jul 2014
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/silicon-valley-h1b-visas-hurt-tech-workers

She supported more H-1B visas in April of this year:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2014/04/08/hillary-clinton-comes-to-san-francisco-talks-tech-immigration-and-whether-shell-run-for-office/

Asked by Marketo’s Fernandez about how she would deal with the shortage of H-1B visas, which tech companies rely in to bring in non-U.S. workers such as computer engineers, she suggested thinking longer term and working with colleges –using cash from Silicon Valley – to train people in the U.S. to fill those jobs,while in the shorter term pressing for more H-1B visas.



Hey, Hillary, THE STEM CRISIS IS A MYTH.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
37. Hillary be cautious. If you give a Republican an inch they will take a yard.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:27 AM
Jul 2014
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
47. They will "they will take a yard" and tell everyone to "get off my lawn".
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:37 AM
Jul 2014

Faux pas

(16,343 posts)
39. The games people play...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:29 AM
Jul 2014

I don't want her as my candidate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
42. There she is in the photo sitting next to 9ui11iani
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:32 AM
Jul 2014

this is starting to look like 2008 redux

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
50. Now we can see why her poll numbers are dropping
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:40 AM
Jul 2014

Hillary's biggest liability is that she is about a decade behind the nation as for as her stance on major policies.

Cutting entitlements was endorsed by Obama and he was defeated by the liberals in Congress. If Hillary keeps this up, Liz Warren may change her mind and challenge her.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
51. The stoopid, it burns
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:43 AM
Jul 2014

Obama's biggest flaw was his constant "reaching out" to people who would not piss on him if he were on fire.

HRC believes that he wasn't obsequious enough.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
52. Perhaps, she can team up with the Repubs and vote for another war.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:46 AM
Jul 2014

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
53. She's never been my primary choice ever any way.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:48 AM
Jul 2014

Sadly, if she does run and win the primary, I don't see any other option but voting Hillary against the Republican.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
56. "more assertive stance toward global crises" = More War!
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:01 AM
Jul 2014

Fuck war and anyone who advocates for it.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
57. It's Bill speaking -- since he is the Shadow Presidential Candidate...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:03 AM
Jul 2014

Remember the "Two for the Price of One?"

awake

(3,226 posts)
60. Great now Hillary is tearing down Obama instead of helping Democrats get elected this year
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:13 AM
Jul 2014

Elizabeth Warren is hard at work on the ground helping our people get elected while Hillary and Bill are hanging out with their Repuck friends looking for more money for themselves. I think Hillary may believe that she will have a better chance if we lose this fall.

hootinholler

(26,451 posts)
61. If by woo they mean
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:17 AM
Jul 2014

Beating them to a bloody pulp with a big stick, then I will reconsider Hillary.

Where is the woo patrol?

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
62. The headline is misleading. Nowhere does she actually say this in the article.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:23 AM
Jul 2014

rurallib

(64,685 posts)
64. wall street journal - more murdoch bullshit
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:34 AM
Jul 2014

NY Post says Obama favors Warren - more Murdoch bullshit.

They must be really scared.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
65. the WSJ is imagining the part about the wooing
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:38 AM
Jul 2014

I think she's capable of saying something like that, and I expected that this story would have examples of it, but those examples were not to be found.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
66. Maybe she should run as a Republican and promise to "reach out" to Democrats.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:42 AM
Jul 2014

awake

(3,226 posts)
69. At her hart she is still the board member of Wall mart
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:46 AM
Jul 2014

Last edited Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:26 PM - Edit history (1)

She could win as a Repuk if they would give her the nomination

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
67. Hillary has a short memory.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:42 AM
Jul 2014

How did the Republicans treat Bill and Hillary when they were in office? It was four times as bad for Obama.

Maybe Elizabeth should run so I have someone to vote for. Bill and Hillary are closing some gates for me.

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
71. The article doesn't even quote her. It's BS speculation from the WSJ.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jul 2014

Historic NY

(40,013 posts)
68. Looks more like okay lets creates news...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:44 AM
Jul 2014

.just like the NY Post and Kleins article.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
70. Why reach out to a Republican party that's in the toilet?
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:54 AM
Jul 2014

The Third Way is in a bit of a pickle. They can't continue to swirl the Democratic party in that toilet.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
72. The more she says, the more queasy I get.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 11:59 AM
Jul 2014

I've tried to find something redeeming about her as a possible presidential candidate, but she is not helping at all.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
75. Hillary Clinton
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:39 PM
Jul 2014

is a very good strategist and long term thinker. She is already out maneuvering the right wing media and she hasn't even thrown her hat in the ring.

Bravo!

awake

(3,226 posts)
77. Can you give an example of her good strategy working in the past
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 12:45 PM
Jul 2014
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
87. you forgot the tag
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:08 PM
Jul 2014

but that does make it funnier!

Response to Segami (Original post)

bigtree

(94,220 posts)
79. you're being played
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jul 2014

. . . by a republican message team. This isn't some Clinton-generated release of this 'info', it's an orchestrated attempt to divide the party against Clinton. It's been stirring around for a week or so now waiting for some enterprising Democrat to make it part of their campaign against Hillary.

You can't actually believe the one who reported this really thinks there's going to be some collusion of republicans with Hillary, but it fits right into the narrative here - no matter that Clinton has one of the most liberal overall records among her Democratic peers.

What she's reported to have said, whenever she was supposed to say it, is nothing more than rhetorical nicety for the political ear. It had nothing to do with Clinton's actual strategy. It's just something engineered and designed to inflame. We used to call it flamebait here. Now it's just political fodder for folks with a grudge; no matter where it originates to the person taking advantage of it; mission accomplished for the original messenger.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
80. Or unless you vote for a true liberal in economics and representation,
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:06 PM
Jul 2014

your vote doesn't have the value you think it does if you think by voting Democrat no matter their view, you actually change anything in the direction of liberal in the modern sense of the word.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
81. Make sure you read to the bottom of the WSJ article....
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jul 2014


-snip-

Nicholas was careful to note that Clinton "hasn't repudiated Mr. Obama" and that her "comments aimed at highlighting her differences with Mr. Obama are often implied rather than stated bluntly."

Scroll to the bottom of the piece and you'll find Clinton sounding far less critical (and cryptic) on the current president's bipartisan record. Nicholas quoted Clinton at the Colorado event as saying that Obama has "worked so hard and reached out so often, and it gets discouraging because you don't feel like you're getting much back."

"I don't think you can ever stop. And I think that's part of whoever the next president is just has to be ready to do," she added.
emphasis added - Don

Obama has been criticized for years by conservative and centrist pundits alike for not doing enough to build relationships with Republican lawmakers. The criticism has clearly annoyed Obama, who's bristled at the idea that playing golf with House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) would alleviate Washington's ills.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-distancing-obama-bill-never-stopped-reaching-out

abakan

(1,996 posts)
82. Hillary is not my first choice, and crap like this...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 01:40 PM
Jul 2014

Hillary Clinton should STFU

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
90. Nonsense.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 02:52 PM
Jul 2014

The idea that even one Republican will repudiate the money and roll over for a woman named Clinton is delusional.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
91. This attitude is why our country is headed down the toilet
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 03:29 PM
Jul 2014

You cant "do more to woo Republicans" and "be more effective in the pursuit of Democratic policy goals"
at the same time.

Thats just an admission she intends on being even MORE conservative than Obama, and we dont need that.

retread

(3,919 posts)
92. I have a firm policy. I never pay any attention to anything the WSJ spews.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 03:30 PM
Jul 2014
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...