Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums*Should Anonymous be on the 2012 TIME 100 Poll ? vote
The 2012 TIME 100 Poll
Cast your votes for the leaders, artists, innovators, icons and heroes you think are the most influential people in the world. Official voting ends on Friday, April 6, and the poll winner will be included in the TIME 100 issue. The complete
TIME 100 list will be chosen by our editors and revealed on TIME.com on Tuesday, April 17.
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109562,00.html
Anonymous
Age: Indeterminate
Occupation: Shadowy, loose-knit cadre of hackers
Anonymous isn't a person. It's not even a group of people in any well-defined sense. But if you tick off the thin-skinned, ad hoc network of hackers who collaborate under the Anonymous moniker, get ready for trouble. Members have reportedly attacked sites ranging from the Vatican's to those of major companies such as PayPal and Sony; they apparently released 75,000 credit-card numbers belonging to customers of research firm Stratfor. Arrests of dozens of suspected participants in multiple countries haven't shut down the leaderless organization.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109562,00.html #ixzz1rBLDIDby
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2327 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*Should Anonymous be on the 2012 TIME 100 Poll ? vote (Original Post)
G_j
Apr 2012
OP
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)1. Awesome!
Thanks, G_j.
G_j
(40,367 posts)2. majority in favor,
Definitely 80.04%
No Way 19.96%
KansDem
(28,498 posts)3. 80.04% "Yes" -- 19.96% "No"
Why not? After all, they're an organization and organizations are "people" now...
CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)5. LOL at the hate for Mittens and Newt. NO WAY in the 70-80% range!
arthritisR_US
(7,287 posts)6. done! rec
starroute
(12,977 posts)7. They're not "thin-skinned" -- they're fanatics for justice
Thin-skinned is when somebody makes a joke and you take it personally. But Anonymous doesn't take anything personally. None of their actions are undertaken in defense of their own reputation. Everything they do is directed at bloated corporate power, fossilized institutions, abusive cops, overly-intrusive security firms, and people who harm pussycats.
That's not thin-skinned.
G_j
(40,367 posts)8. yes, that is quite ridiculous
then again, it is Time magazine...