Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,367 posts)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:56 AM Apr 2012

*Should Anonymous be on the 2012 TIME 100 Poll ? vote


The 2012 TIME 100 Poll
Cast your votes for the leaders, artists, innovators, icons and heroes you think are the most influential people in the world. Official voting ends on Friday, April 6, and the poll winner will be included in the TIME 100 issue. The complete
TIME 100 list will be chosen by our editors and revealed on TIME.com on Tuesday, April 17.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109562,00.html

Anonymous
Age: Indeterminate
Occupation: Shadowy, loose-knit cadre of hackers

Anonymous isn't a person. It's not even a group of people in any well-defined sense. But if you tick off the thin-skinned, ad hoc network of hackers who collaborate under the Anonymous moniker, get ready for trouble. Members have reportedly attacked sites ranging from the Vatican's to those of major companies such as PayPal and Sony; they apparently released 75,000 credit-card numbers belonging to customers of research firm Stratfor. Arrests of dozens of suspected participants in multiple countries haven't shut down the leaderless organization.


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2107952_2107953_2109562,00.html #ixzz1rBLDIDby
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*Should Anonymous be on the 2012 TIME 100 Poll ? vote (Original Post) G_j Apr 2012 OP
Awesome! EFerrari Apr 2012 #1
majority in favor, G_j Apr 2012 #2
80.04% "Yes" -- 19.96% "No" KansDem Apr 2012 #3
kick Zorra Apr 2012 #4
LOL at the hate for Mittens and Newt. NO WAY in the 70-80% range! CurtEastPoint Apr 2012 #5
done! rec arthritisR_US Apr 2012 #6
They're not "thin-skinned" -- they're fanatics for justice starroute Apr 2012 #7
yes, that is quite ridiculous G_j Apr 2012 #8

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
3. 80.04% "Yes" -- 19.96% "No"
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 12:10 PM
Apr 2012

Why not? After all, they're an organization and organizations are "people" now...

starroute

(12,977 posts)
7. They're not "thin-skinned" -- they're fanatics for justice
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 02:51 PM
Apr 2012

Thin-skinned is when somebody makes a joke and you take it personally. But Anonymous doesn't take anything personally. None of their actions are undertaken in defense of their own reputation. Everything they do is directed at bloated corporate power, fossilized institutions, abusive cops, overly-intrusive security firms, and people who harm pussycats.

That's not thin-skinned.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*Should Anonymous be on t...