General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLiv Tyler is Ready For Hillary

In the July issue, Tyler is shown in a relaxed white cotton T-shirt, which reads simply, "Hillary For President." The political top is the focal point of the photos, as the brunette star looks gorgeous with minimal makeup and her hair in loose waves.
In the extended interview, the actress is called "an unabashed supporter" of Hillary Clinton and the type of gender equality progress that she represents.
"I love women," Tyler told Violet Grey. "I'm intrigued by them. I think women are fascinating and complex."
Her support for rumored presidential candidate Clinton, 66, is a rare move for Tyler, who has largely stayed out of the political game while in the limelight.
Read more: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/liv-tyler-supports-hillary-clinton-in-hillary-for-president-t-shirt-201487#ixzz36upl2pqc
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Always liked her.
JI7
(93,617 posts)BootinUp
(51,323 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 8, 2014, 06:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Response to Metric System (Reply #7)
BootinUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Metric System (Reply #7)
hrmjustin This message was self-deleted by its author.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Response to hrmjustin (Reply #26)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But people have to step up if they want to challenge her.
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #36)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Even if it IS Hillary.....then you are not a "real Democrat"
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #55)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #73)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)I think the "reeaaal" Democrats among us are feeling a bit panicked.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)Accepting that there is an imperfect fit between the Democratic Party and the furthest aims of left and progressive people, several things must be acknowledged.
First, it has to be acknowledged that left and progressive people really do not have solid ground to proclaim they and only they are true Democrats, or are the real base of the Democratic Party, and that people who are left of center or center-left or even centerists are not really Democrats.
Second, left and progressive people need to consider whether the tactic of attacking people who are perhaps a bit to the right of them, though generally well to the left of a national average, or of the average in the locale where they reside, as rightists who do not belong in the Democratic Party, is likely to expand and increase their influence in the Democratic Party, and advance the prospects of actually getting laws and regulations they would like to see adopted come to pass.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023721513
The Statement Is Nonesense, Sir, And On Several Levels... the perennial brouha here about what constitutes a "real Democrat", most of which is conducted along lines that bear very little relation with the actual states and history of the Democratic Party. The idea that figures like Presidents Kennedy and Johnson were not "real Democrats" is nothing but the punch-line to a very poor joke, although it is certainly true that they embraced many policies and ideas that some of our radicals today detest. But that latter is hardly an indication they were not "real Democrats"; rather, it is an indication that such radicals are somewhat out of step with the Democratic Party as a real institution and political force, as opposed to an ideal item they imagine not only to be fact, but to be wholly agreeable to them. The fact is that the Cold War was fought by Democrats as well as Republicans, and was a solid item of Democratic Party identity and policy in those days. The faction of the Democratic Party that opposed the Cold War had its politiocal trial with the campaign for President of Sec. Wallace in 1948, and failed utterly, gaining the votes of only a handful of people. What is repudiated at the polls by the overwhelming preponderance of Democratic voters cannot be the real face of the Democratic Party. It really is that simple.
That Presidents Carter and Clinton could be described from some vantages as centerists is hardly sufficient to establish as fact a claim they were not "real Democrats". Such a statement depends on assent to the proposition that the Democratic Party is an organ of the far left, and there really is not a trace of support for this notion in history. The fact is that the Democratic party occupies, and has throughout the latter portion of the twentieth century and into our present days occupied, a position roughly analogous to that of a moderate Social Democrat element in European politics, which is very far from a radical left view, and during that period in Europe has been taken as the chief enemy by the radical left. It seeks a degree of reform and mitigation of the capitalist order, not its complete restructuring or overthrow. This is both a fairly popular view among the people, and a position of long and distinguished pedigree on the left, dating back almost to the origins of the modern left in the mid-nineteenth century. The schism between reformers and revolutionists is a very old one among leftists, and is one that the revolutionists have tended to be on the losing side of in all polities containing a reasonable degree of democratic representationalism in their governments.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2629166&mesg_id=2629240
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Thanks for posting it. I somehow missed it.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Hillary Clinton supporters. Sorry for not being clearer.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)being re-posted by Wyldwolf. So...sorry, not sorry.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BootinUp
(51,323 posts)nothing to apologize for.
JI7
(93,617 posts)even if most of the others in the band are republican/libertarians
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)and doesn't care that Clinton is "all the other things".
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Why is it that women are almost always second guessed around here....."that's not really what she meant" is becoming a trend on DU....
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)BootinUp
(51,323 posts)MoonRiver
(36,975 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)everything I am called in question because i don't agree. I don't agree with liv but i love her. Arwan forever.
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)We all have strong opinions or we probably wouldn't be here.
Response to conservaphobe (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)who did not even raise them. Todd Rundgren (no corporate sellout he) was more of a father to her.
Response to CBGLuthier (Reply #9)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)If they had all OD'd ( as it seemed they would) in the 80's maybe their legacy would not have been so badly tarnished.
Response to CBGLuthier (Reply #13)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but Liv Tyler, worth $20 million, isn't exactly an average working class American.
If Hillary is like Bill, she will be very good for the $20 million set.
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)Response to BootinUp (Reply #47)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #57)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)For President.....repeatedly!
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #65)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #71)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #75)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #79)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #71)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)So its your logic that is faulty
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #88)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)talked about it. I expect her to be very progressive on this issue.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)which is not very good
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2665533
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)And for some reason those tax increases never happened
and wealthy celebrities like Hanks and Clooney are always raving about what a great job he has done.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Why are women often associated with the choices the male members of their families make?
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #18)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)No need to get so emotional.
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #22)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Or did you maybe miss that bit?
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #29)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Whatever you need to tell yourself. Have a great day!
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #35)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)I got my answer to my question.
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #42)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
JI7
(93,617 posts)LLD
(136 posts)But you just chose a warmonger.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)but as far as Hillary is concerned, You need to come and claim her. Hadafang rises.
louis-t
(24,618 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)underpants
(196,495 posts)Good for her
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)in my book at least
LWolf
(46,179 posts)That's what we're conditioned for...a neo-liberal or a right-wing whack job.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)Leave the TMZ bullshit for TMZ.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)What a surprise.
Sure am glad I don't give a hoot what any actor or actress, music personality, race car driver, over-paid sports celebrity, or even a barkeep thinks about politics.
I vote issues and history of the candidate. Period.
In the case of Hillary, she fails on both.
Response to conservaphobe (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Sid
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Like any U.S. citizen, Liv is free to endorse whomever she wishes to endorse. It does not matter to me one way or another.
NBachers
(19,438 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)only seems fair to return the favor.
Jersey Girl is a GREAT movie.
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)BootinUp
(51,323 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)Im gonna step out on a limb and guess he and his wife Michelle Gray, his touring employer Ringo Starr and a number of others
wont be backing Hamburger Hill and her foreign policy aka "It takes an Army to Raze a Village"
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)I do not think you have an accurate picture of the candidate in question. Thats my read. I am 50 years old, seen a lot, and I am saying that it is highly unlikely that Hillary is the war monger you seem to think she is.
reddread
(6,896 posts)unfortunately, we are the same age, and Ive seen shit NOBODY wants to see.
Including, and most significantly the politics and actions of Hillary's close friend.
You would vomit to know what they are made of.