Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:31 AM Jul 2014

Undisputable Bubble Insanity: No Revenue, No Assets Company Up Over $1 Billion

Undisputable Bubble Insanity: No Revenue, No Assets Company Up Over $1 Billion (+110%) Today On 57K Shares Traded

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/09/2014 22:31 -0400

Update 2: CYNK closed up 150%, at an all time high of $14.70, a market cap well over $4 billion. Clearly there is much untapped upside left for the company with no assets or revenues.

Update: Stock is now $14/share, implying a market cap for the revenue/asset-free compah of over $4 billion. This means it has a market cap higher than Dynegy, Federal Mogul, JetBlue or Buffalo Wild Wings.




Just 2 days ago we highlighted the best example of the exuberance awash the markets currently - CYNK Technology Corp, the social media development company that had a market capitalization in excess of $1 billion, which according to official filings, had one employee, no website, no revenue, no product, and no assets.

Fast forward 2 days - and some 57,000 shares traded (about 0.02% of its total shares outstanding) at around $10 and CYNK now has a market cap approaching $3 billion (and still no revenue, no product, and no assets)... Lord Overstone said it best. “No warning can save people determined to grow suddenly rich.”

MORE


- So is it a PumpNDump if everybody knows it's a PumpNDump -- and they invest in it anyways because they know they can still make a killing if they get out of it in time?

Is it a con if everyone knows it's a con?

When is a con, not a con?

Seems like this used to be clearer......


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
2. I thought there was meant to be some minimum viability for a company to get a stock exchange listing
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:59 AM
Jul 2014

How did someone register about 200 million shares with some exchange in the first place?

hatrack

(59,578 posts)
5. There's just as much nitrous oxide inside the bubble as there ever was . . .
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 08:44 AM
Jul 2014

It's just that the bubble shrinks steadily, until only the Chosen Rich Fools inhabit it.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
7. This one is bound to pop soon
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 09:25 AM
Jul 2014

and everyone who just bought in is going to howl, whine, complain and then proceed to stupidly do the same thing all over again.

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
8. I am opposing a social order in which it is possible for one man...
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 09:36 AM
Jul 2014

I am opposing a social order in which it is possible for one man who does absolutely nothing that is useful to amass a fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars, while millions of men and women who work all the days of their lives secure barely enough for a wretched existence.
"Statement to the Court Upon Being Convicted of Violating the Sedition Act" (18 September 1918)

--E V Debs

(rolling over in his grave. Despite an exceptional decade or two last century, we've only moved backwards, Mr Debs.)

haele

(12,640 posts)
12. Good lord, how much of this is from formulas blindly coming up "buy" at computerized brokerages?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jul 2014

If trades start going up over the 'net, and there's no one at the switch at these companies to actually check if there's something being traded, I could see how there would be a logarithmic jump in capitalization just from a virtual effect.
The market now has a very simple brain - programs on a network - that's driving by it's big mouth.

There is still "no value" in this company, but whoowee - talk about making money out of nothing. But still, with no assets or product, it's just as much a con as putting out an ad in personals "Starving student - just send a dollar to this p.o. box" - which is illegal in most states. Strange that it is legal...

Haele

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
16. With the way Wall Street is doing lately you can ge taway with it
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 11:39 PM
Jul 2014

it's good times over there, very good times.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Undisputable Bubble Insan...