General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTime to boycott Walgreens
If they say they are not an American company and dont need to pay taxes ....why should I use my American after tax dollars to support and patronize them?
+
jwirr
(39,215 posts)them up for me and Walgreens is on their way home. I have only so many other options: Walmart, the pharmacy at our clinic way on the other side of town or some on-line pharmacy.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)...meds from them and you do NOT have to be a Costco member. Just tell the greeter you're going to the pharmacy.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)stores would mail meds.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)My AARP Medicare Plan has a mail program for RX that are renewable. I asked COSTCO if they could do the same and the pharmacy said yes.
So I googled this for you and hope this helps you.
I started going back to COSTCO after pricing RX and Walgreens was 3 times as much. What I liked about Walgreens was the drive-through pharmacy when in too much pain to walk all the way to the back of the COSTCO store.
But the cost of RX for 3 months was less than 1 month at Walgreens. Good luck.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)I miss the days when pharmacies routinely delivered. One does here, but I'm just outside their delivery limits.
As for WM, if you go online and order your refills in advance, their drive-thrus aren't that slow. Going in and dropping something off, though, and you'll be waiting 2 hours around here.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)all of my prescriptions at the same time.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)to keep your business. And they can do some pretty competitive price matching too. Talk to the pharmacist, not the folks behind the counter. If you don't get what you need there, call or email corporate. Everybody's got a boss.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)My parents (aged 97 and 88) were using Costco for their medications (for price). And then my father broke his femur this spring and can't drive anymore (thank heavens for that, at least!). Either my brother, or when we were in town, ourselves had to drive there for to pick up various of their array of medications for the first few months.
And then the Medicare nursing team that has been visiting him during his recuperation at home got them signed up to get their medications delivered to their door from (gosh, I forget the name of the outfit). Whatever the company is called, they sent a pharmacist to my parents' house to meet with them and check on all their meds, and she set up a program where once a month, each of them gets a box of their daily medications. Better than that: morning and evening pills are each in their own little tear-off packet on a roll (each labeled with their name, whether am or pm, and the names of the meds), which comes out of the box like a ticker-tape and is easy to separate. No more opening containers and counting out of pills into complex pill boxes! No more worrying about mistakes! No more running to the pharmacy! I think it's the best thing since sliced bread.
Now, if you only have one or two meds a day, maybe this is not necessary for you. But it's made my parents' life (and ours--both in terms of errands and worrying about them) a thousand times easier!
(I'll get the name if you're interested.) At any rate, you DON'T have to use Walgreen's.
5X
(3,972 posts)if you need pain meds, they make you wait hours to days extra. Trying to cover their ass
due to a fine for over filling pain meds.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)But I live in a tiny corner of the Midwest, where there's only one pharmacy in town. The next nearest is 55 miles away, where they have several. Two of those deliver to this bump in the road because they have employees who live here and that makes delivery simple. Personally I'd raise cain over pain meds just a little in advance of actual need in order to gradually have a few extra to keep a few on hand.
broiles
(1,367 posts)5X
(3,972 posts)questionseverything
(9,654 posts)i can't blame walgreens for that
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)But I'm being sarcastic. I'm sure he can get all he wants. It's just us poor people who get the shaft.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)(In my town) CVS sometimes opened new stores near these URBAN location to remain competitive. BUT prices are really high there and service really sucks at Walgreen's with long, slow lines at check outs - you might as well be at Walmart's!
I wont be shopping there if I can help it.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)leaves me CVS or RiteAid ... which is better? Thanks.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Recent data is hard to find easily. This is from 2012:
Rite Aid seems to historically lean to giving more $$ to Dems 61/39.
CVS is more of a tossup - 52/48 favoring Dems.
Walgreens leans more Repug 42/58.
Rite-Aid - Democratic
Donations : $2,771,210 (1990-2012)
Democrat : 61% Republican : 39%
CVS Caremark - Democratic
Donations : $4,212,894 (1992-2012)
Democrat : 52% Republican : 48%
Read more at http://shopyourpolitics.com/democratic-leaning#pe0FWjuBa0LUqVVD.99
WalGreen - Republican
Donations : $3,033,823 (1990-2012)
Democrat : 42% Republican : 58%
Read more at http://shopyourpolitics.com/republican-leaning#ZSjBqm2xeu3RX66f.99
Also in CVS's favor is the fact that they are stopping the sale of tobacco products as of this October, which IMHO is a very good thing.
Read more at http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20140206/BLOG010/140209910/cvs-tells-customers-to-go-elsewhere-if-they-want-to-buy-smokes#
So overall, IMHO it is a tossup between those two - Riteaid has the financial edge, CVS seems more socially responsible.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Easier to get to for me. Thanks again for the info and links.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)RA also has a program, spend $500 a year using their Wellness card and get a free gift (not fancy gifts but hey, anything is a bonus) . I have gotten one every year so far due to the $ we spend on prescriptions.
Stuart G
(38,421 posts)I read that they were considering moving, but I did not see any definite info that that a decision to move has been made. Any one know for sure?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024822222
Just like the Market store protests, this is a war between the shareholders, not a bad attitude on the part of Walgreens as a whole. It's not like they can tell the shareholders, IOW, their owners, to go take a flying leap.
Only advantage for consumers I can possibly imagine in some fantasy, is that the price of drugs would go down and the quality and safety of drugs might go up due to EU standards and subsidies. But it still stinks.
If the Do-Nothing House will finally represent the people instead of the Rand Cannibal Class, they might listen to PBO who has been trying to get the loopholes closed for years. He's talking it up more to the American people to let them apply pressure, if anyone is listening and willing to get involved.
President Obama: Weekly Address: Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes
...Even as corporate profits are as high as ever, a small but growing group of big corporations are fleeing the country to get out of paying taxes. Theyre keeping most of their business inside the United States, but theyre basically renouncing their citizenship and declaring that theyre based somewhere else, just to avoid paying their fair share.
I want to be clear: this is only a few big corporations so far. The vast majority of American businesses pay their taxes right here in the United States. But when some companies cherrypick their taxes, it damages the countrys finances. It adds to the deficit. It makes it harder to invest in the things that will keep America strong, and it sticks you with the tab for what they stash offshore. Right now, a loophole in our tax laws makes this totally legal and I think thats totally wrong. You dont get to pick which rules you play by, or which tax rate you pay, and neither should these companies.
The best way to level the playing field is through tax reform that lowers the corporate tax rate, closes wasteful loopholes, and simplifies the tax code for everybody. But stopping companies from renouncing their citizenship just to get out of paying their fair share of taxes is something that cannot wait. Thats why, in my budget earlier this year, I proposed closing this unpatriotic tax loophole for good. Democrats in Congress have advanced proposals that would do the same thing. A couple Republicans have indicated they want to address this too, and I hope more join us.
Rather than double-down on the top-down economics that let a fortunate few play by their own rules, lets embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together, as one nation, and as one people. Lets reward the hard work of ordinary Americans who play by the rules. Together, we can build up our middle class, hand down something better to our kids, and restore the American Dream for all who work for it and study for it and strive for it.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/26/weekly-address-closing-corporate-tax-loopholes
to cal04:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=856260
Emboldening is mine.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)my insurance just allows 3 stores for prescriptions - walgreens, walmart (don't shop there for decades) and Kmart (roach infested stores - and I say this from personal experience. ).
spanone
(135,830 posts)i dropped them years ago.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)says, "Well, not going there anymore." It was a tough thing for him to say because Walgreen, for some inexplainable reason, is his favorite store.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If not, then I suggest you talk to someone who does.
I've seen that shit destroy people's lives. I am actually glad that a company is taking the initiative to try and protect people from what they sell. These questions seem like something we should be praising, not attacking.
The truth is that I had to fire someone a few months ago because of his addiction to his pain medication. He had only worked a couple weeks for us and was doing well. Then he had to take time off to see his doctor and fill his prescription. I fired him 3 days later. He was not in any shape to be doing work that is possibly dangerous (as some of ours is) and I could never dream of letting him drive one of the company vehicles while he was like that. He may as well have been on heroine, as my former brother in law was, as well as a friend's father (note, they are both dead now).
I wish gun stores were as responsible about who they sell weapons and bullets to.
http://www.wthr.com/story/23469086/2013/09/18/walgreens-secret-checklist-reveals-controversial-new-policy-on-pain-pills
As for the tax dodge, we need to change the laws. Tax the bastards!
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)who gets the meds and who doesn't. That is between the patients and their doctors.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)that will alleviate a lot of the pain med under-prescription. When it's legal, I intend to grow one plant indoors under a grow light upstairs - just enough for the occasional pan of brownies. And not let word get out around here because that's begging home invasion. Since I stared down the local militia, nobody's made another peep about bothering me any way at all, and I don't intend to attract trouble.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Indydem
(2,642 posts)Walgreens is NOT looking to move offshore!
A group of shareholders totaling 5% ownership asked them to look into it at their annual meeting.
That does NOT mean Walgreens wants to do this, or that it will.
Read something besides propaganda for the love of God.
http://www.minyanville.com/trading-and-investing/stocks/articles/Walgreens-Stakeholders-Pushing-For-Company-to/4/17/2014/id/54652
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)You can't blame people for getting in an uproar when companies even let a devilish demand like offshoring go unanswered for so long. If I wanted to keep customers, I'd get out in front of a 'rumor' and quash it immediately.
Walgreens hasn't even offered a weak denial that I know of, so don't snap the whip over people for getting riled at the possibility in an effort to make yourself seem like the only adult in the room. I'm 68 and I say raise hell with corporate HQ to make sure they don't decide against Americans.
No apology either, btw.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)boycott if this is their intention.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/07/26/walgreens-inversion-tax-taxes/13090921/
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)See my post # 34 above for the breakdown.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)As for more independent or regional pharmacies being unable to compete on prices, I've learned that where there's a Walgreens nearby, the others will do wonders to keep their customers.
Stuart G
(38,421 posts)I think the vote to move or stay will be in August. There is pressure to move, but I would assume there is also strong pressure to stay in their current location because of the history of being a Chicago based corporation. The article says that their is a potential to save over 700 million if the company moves, but the board of directors has made no decision yet.
This is the most recent issue of Crain's and has no mention of a vote to move...
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/section/issue
frazzled
(18,402 posts)"Inversion"moving headquarters to a lower-taxed country, usually by buying a company in that country and making the subsidiary the parent--is becoming much more common practice of large corporations. A lot of inversions have occurred in recent years. For many of the companies, there's little incentive NOT to do this. But Walgreen's is different: it interacts with the public, and public reaction and anger could prevent them from doing this.
By the way, whether they "move" their headquarters to Switzerland or not, they will still be Chicago-based in terms of personnel, offices, and facilities. The inversion is really on paper only. The CEOs and other corporate honchos are not required to move to Switzerland and do their business from there. That is done by the subsidiary company. It's a "paper" move. And it's so easy to do, there's no reason for them not to, unless the public tells them that they will not reward their greed.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Drale
(7,932 posts)and they really are a terrible company.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)America bandwagon.
Mike Nelson
(9,953 posts)...tho they are #2 in Dem donations, I'm going with CVS for not selling tobacco.
...happy if Walgreens is not moving, but they give too much to Republicans.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)for cigarettes. I am a smoker and only buy my cigarettes from Walgreen's. But many of their other products are more expensive than Kroger's drug department.
vanlassie
(5,670 posts)California based Longs Drugs and trashed them. Laid shity smelly carpet, cheap products, cheap wages. Previous Longs employees were really upset and so was I, on their behalf. I prefer Rite Aid. Or local, but that's pretty much only a dream.