Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time to boycott Walgreens (Original Post) coljam Jul 2014 OP
This is easier said than done. The reason I use them for my medicines is that I need someone to pick jwirr Jul 2014 #1
If Costco is nearby, you can get inexpensive... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jul 2014 #15
No Costco. If Costco is in MN at all and if they mail medicines I would love to change to them. jwirr Jul 2014 #16
Sorry. Hopefully someone else will see my post WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jul 2014 #17
There are several Costco stores in MN - I googled. I need to do more research and call to see if the jwirr Jul 2014 #21
Costco Pharmacy Home Delivery: freshwest Jul 2014 #40
Bookmarking to use on Monday. Thanks. jwirr Jul 2014 #45
Mail order might have a lower copay, it all depends on the insurance company. moriah Jul 2014 #19
I have a pharmacy that delivers. They have a "Simplify my meds" program where they refill Louisiana1976 Jul 2014 #43
Please ask around, then; even if it's not an advertised service, some pharmacies will deliver just IrishAyes Jul 2014 #25
There's another way frazzled Jul 2014 #30
already do....worse service ever and now 5X Jul 2014 #2
I'm very sorry to hear that. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #27
Already started and I used to spend lots there. broiles Jul 2014 #3
Here is a link that explains their new policy... 5X Jul 2014 #4
it is the dea turning pharmacies into law enforcement questionseverything Jul 2014 #10
Well I guess Limbaugh won't be getting his OxyContin at Walgreens anymore. totodeinhere Jul 2014 #14
During the 00s, Walgreen's was the only retailer opening new URBAN locations... TheDebbieDee Jul 2014 #5
willing to do this but, all the local pharmacies are way on the other side of town ... so that Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #6
Not a clear choice Tommymac Jul 2014 #34
Thanks. Will think about this. Leaning to RiteAid Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #39
NP you are welcome. Same choice I made a few years ago - same reason as you. :) Tommymac Jul 2014 #46
Question, Have They Decided to Definitely Move? Stuart G Jul 2014 #7
Found a thread saying they won't do it but can't find it now. Here's who's pushing it, shareholders: freshwest Jul 2014 #12
If anyone ever thought of you as other than bold, I'd send for the butterfly nets. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #28
Ugh, hollysmom Jul 2014 #8
it should be none of their fucking business what meds i take. they are a store. my doctor prescribes spanone Jul 2014 #9
I told my husband about Walgreen going off shore and he Skidmore Jul 2014 #11
Anyone here opposed to their new drug policy know people addicted to pain meds? Motown_Johnny Jul 2014 #13
Yes addiction to pain meds is a serious problem. But it's not the place of Walgreens to decide totodeinhere Jul 2014 #18
Well, at least when we get recreational pot in every state, IrishAyes Jul 2014 #29
they employ a lot of disabled folks Liberal_in_LA Jul 2014 #20
You do business here, you pay your fair share here, just like everybody else blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #22
Holy Shit - This bullshit story still has legs? Indydem Jul 2014 #23
If they have NO intention of moving, don't you think it would be better business to say so ASAP? IrishAyes Jul 2014 #32
Here is an article posted today and it appears they are headed in this direction. We should Pisces Jul 2014 #35
But they are a Red Leaning Company donation wise. Tommymac Jul 2014 #36
I haven't been near them in years. But I agree with you. IrishAyes Jul 2014 #24
This article in Crain's Chicago Business, July 7,2014 implies there has NOT been a vote to move yet Stuart G Jul 2014 #26
And that's why we need to keep the pressure on them, through boycott and letters frazzled Jul 2014 #37
Thanks for the information. freshwest Jul 2014 #41
I unfortunately, for now, work at Walgreen's Drale Jul 2014 #31
I agree 100% I will take my dollars to CVS. I'm surprised more Republicans aren't on this shop Pisces Jul 2014 #33
Thank you all for an informative thread... Mike Nelson Jul 2014 #38
I hate to say this, but Walgreen's is the cheapest RebelOne Jul 2014 #44
I hate CVS with a passion. Partly because they bought out vanlassie Jul 2014 #42

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
1. This is easier said than done. The reason I use them for my medicines is that I need someone to pick
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 01:01 PM
Jul 2014

them up for me and Walgreens is on their way home. I have only so many other options: Walmart, the pharmacy at our clinic way on the other side of town or some on-line pharmacy.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
15. If Costco is nearby, you can get inexpensive...
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:13 PM
Jul 2014

...meds from them and you do NOT have to be a Costco member. Just tell the greeter you're going to the pharmacy.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
21. There are several Costco stores in MN - I googled. I need to do more research and call to see if the
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:22 PM
Jul 2014

stores would mail meds.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
40. Costco Pharmacy Home Delivery:
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 05:40 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.costco.com/Pharmacy/home-delivery?storeId=10301&catalogId=10701&langId=-1

My AARP Medicare Plan has a mail program for RX that are renewable. I asked COSTCO if they could do the same and the pharmacy said yes.

So I googled this for you and hope this helps you.

I started going back to COSTCO after pricing RX and Walgreens was 3 times as much. What I liked about Walgreens was the drive-through pharmacy when in too much pain to walk all the way to the back of the COSTCO store.

But the cost of RX for 3 months was less than 1 month at Walgreens. Good luck.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
19. Mail order might have a lower copay, it all depends on the insurance company.
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:18 PM
Jul 2014

I miss the days when pharmacies routinely delivered. One does here, but I'm just outside their delivery limits.

As for WM, if you go online and order your refills in advance, their drive-thrus aren't that slow. Going in and dropping something off, though, and you'll be waiting 2 hours around here.

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
43. I have a pharmacy that delivers. They have a "Simplify my meds" program where they refill
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jul 2014

all of my prescriptions at the same time.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
25. Please ask around, then; even if it's not an advertised service, some pharmacies will deliver just
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:49 PM
Jul 2014

to keep your business. And they can do some pretty competitive price matching too. Talk to the pharmacist, not the folks behind the counter. If you don't get what you need there, call or email corporate. Everybody's got a boss.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
30. There's another way
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:07 PM
Jul 2014

My parents (aged 97 and 88) were using Costco for their medications (for price). And then my father broke his femur this spring and can't drive anymore (thank heavens for that, at least!). Either my brother, or when we were in town, ourselves had to drive there for to pick up various of their array of medications for the first few months.

And then the Medicare nursing team that has been visiting him during his recuperation at home got them signed up to get their medications delivered to their door from (gosh, I forget the name of the outfit). Whatever the company is called, they sent a pharmacist to my parents' house to meet with them and check on all their meds, and she set up a program where once a month, each of them gets a box of their daily medications. Better than that: morning and evening pills are each in their own little tear-off packet on a roll (each labeled with their name, whether am or pm, and the names of the meds), which comes out of the box like a ticker-tape and is easy to separate. No more opening containers and counting out of pills into complex pill boxes! No more worrying about mistakes! No more running to the pharmacy! I think it's the best thing since sliced bread.

Now, if you only have one or two meds a day, maybe this is not necessary for you. But it's made my parents' life (and ours--both in terms of errands and worrying about them) a thousand times easier!

(I'll get the name if you're interested.) At any rate, you DON'T have to use Walgreen's.

5X

(3,972 posts)
2. already do....worse service ever and now
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jul 2014

if you need pain meds, they make you wait hours to days extra. Trying to cover their ass
due to a fine for over filling pain meds.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
27. I'm very sorry to hear that.
Reply to 5X (Reply #2)
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jul 2014

But I live in a tiny corner of the Midwest, where there's only one pharmacy in town. The next nearest is 55 miles away, where they have several. Two of those deliver to this bump in the road because they have employees who live here and that makes delivery simple. Personally I'd raise cain over pain meds just a little in advance of actual need in order to gradually have a few extra to keep a few on hand.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
14. Well I guess Limbaugh won't be getting his OxyContin at Walgreens anymore.
Reply to 5X (Reply #4)
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:04 PM
Jul 2014

But I'm being sarcastic. I'm sure he can get all he wants. It's just us poor people who get the shaft.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
5. During the 00s, Walgreen's was the only retailer opening new URBAN locations...
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jul 2014

(In my town) CVS sometimes opened new stores near these URBAN location to remain competitive. BUT prices are really high there and service really sucks at Walgreen's with long, slow lines at check outs - you might as well be at Walmart's!

I wont be shopping there if I can help it.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
6. willing to do this but, all the local pharmacies are way on the other side of town ... so that
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jul 2014

leaves me CVS or RiteAid ... which is better? Thanks.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
34. Not a clear choice
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:12 PM
Jul 2014

Recent data is hard to find easily. This is from 2012:

Rite Aid seems to historically lean to giving more $$ to Dems 61/39.
CVS is more of a tossup - 52/48 favoring Dems.
Walgreens leans more Repug 42/58.


Rite-Aid - Democratic
Donations : $2,771,210 (1990-2012)
Democrat : 61% Republican : 39%


CVS Caremark - Democratic
Donations : $4,212,894 (1992-2012)
Democrat : 52% Republican : 48%

Read more at http://shopyourpolitics.com/democratic-leaning#pe0FWjuBa0LUqVVD.99

WalGreen - Republican
Donations : $3,033,823 (1990-2012)
Democrat : 42% Republican : 58%

Read more at http://shopyourpolitics.com/republican-leaning#ZSjBqm2xeu3RX66f.99



Also in CVS's favor is the fact that they are stopping the sale of tobacco products as of this October, which IMHO is a very good thing.

Read more at http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20140206/BLOG010/140209910/cvs-tells-customers-to-go-elsewhere-if-they-want-to-buy-smokes#

So overall, IMHO it is a tossup between those two - Riteaid has the financial edge, CVS seems more socially responsible.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
39. Thanks. Will think about this. Leaning to RiteAid
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 05:16 PM
Jul 2014

Easier to get to for me. Thanks again for the info and links.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
46. NP you are welcome. Same choice I made a few years ago - same reason as you. :)
Sun Jul 27, 2014, 06:24 AM
Jul 2014

RA also has a program, spend $500 a year using their Wellness card and get a free gift (not fancy gifts but hey, anything is a bonus) . I have gotten one every year so far due to the $ we spend on prescriptions.

Stuart G

(38,421 posts)
7. Question, Have They Decided to Definitely Move?
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 01:59 PM
Jul 2014

I read that they were considering moving, but I did not see any definite info that that a decision to move has been made. Any one know for sure?

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. Found a thread saying they won't do it but can't find it now. Here's who's pushing it, shareholders:
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 02:46 PM
Jul 2014
Walgreen Pressured To Move Headquarters To Europe For Tax Purposes

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024822222

Just like the Market store protests, this is a war between the shareholders, not a bad attitude on the part of Walgreens as a whole. It's not like they can tell the shareholders, IOW, their owners, to go take a flying leap.

Only advantage for consumers I can possibly imagine in some fantasy, is that the price of drugs would go down and the quality and safety of drugs might go up due to EU standards and subsidies. But it still stinks.

If the Do-Nothing House will finally represent the people instead of the Rand Cannibal Class, they might listen to PBO who has been trying to get the loopholes closed for years. He's talking it up more to the American people to let them apply pressure, if anyone is listening and willing to get involved.

President Obama: Weekly Address: Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes



...Even as corporate profits are as high as ever, a small but growing group of big corporations are fleeing the country to get out of paying taxes. They’re keeping most of their business inside the United States, but they’re basically renouncing their citizenship and declaring that they’re based somewhere else, just to avoid paying their fair share.

I want to be clear: this is only a few big corporations so far. The vast majority of American businesses pay their taxes right here in the United States. But when some companies cherrypick their taxes, it damages the country’s finances. It adds to the deficit. It makes it harder to invest in the things that will keep America strong, and it sticks you with the tab for what they stash offshore. Right now, a loophole in our tax laws makes this totally legal – and I think that’s totally wrong. You don’t get to pick which rules you play by, or which tax rate you pay, and neither should these companies.

The best way to level the playing field is through tax reform that lowers the corporate tax rate, closes wasteful loopholes, and simplifies the tax code for everybody. But stopping companies from renouncing their citizenship just to get out of paying their fair share of taxes is something that cannot wait. That’s why, in my budget earlier this year, I proposed closing this unpatriotic tax loophole for good. Democrats in Congress have advanced proposals that would do the same thing. A couple Republicans have indicated they want to address this too, and I hope more join us.

Rather than double-down on the top-down economics that let a fortunate few play by their own rules, let’s embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together, as one nation, and as one people. Let’s reward the hard work of ordinary Americans who play by the rules. Together, we can build up our middle class, hand down something better to our kids, and restore the American Dream for all who work for it and study for it and strive for it.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/07/26/weekly-address-closing-corporate-tax-loopholes

to cal04:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=856260

Emboldening is mine.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
8. Ugh,
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jul 2014

my insurance just allows 3 stores for prescriptions - walgreens, walmart (don't shop there for decades) and Kmart (roach infested stores - and I say this from personal experience. ).

spanone

(135,830 posts)
9. it should be none of their fucking business what meds i take. they are a store. my doctor prescribes
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 02:02 PM
Jul 2014

i dropped them years ago.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
11. I told my husband about Walgreen going off shore and he
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 02:38 PM
Jul 2014

says, "Well, not going there anymore." It was a tough thing for him to say because Walgreen, for some inexplainable reason, is his favorite store.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
13. Anyone here opposed to their new drug policy know people addicted to pain meds?
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 02:59 PM
Jul 2014

If not, then I suggest you talk to someone who does.


I've seen that shit destroy people's lives. I am actually glad that a company is taking the initiative to try and protect people from what they sell. These questions seem like something we should be praising, not attacking.

The truth is that I had to fire someone a few months ago because of his addiction to his pain medication. He had only worked a couple weeks for us and was doing well. Then he had to take time off to see his doctor and fill his prescription. I fired him 3 days later. He was not in any shape to be doing work that is possibly dangerous (as some of ours is) and I could never dream of letting him drive one of the company vehicles while he was like that. He may as well have been on heroine, as my former brother in law was, as well as a friend's father (note, they are both dead now).

I wish gun stores were as responsible about who they sell weapons and bullets to.





http://www.wthr.com/story/23469086/2013/09/18/walgreens-secret-checklist-reveals-controversial-new-policy-on-pain-pills




As for the tax dodge, we need to change the laws. Tax the bastards!

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
18. Yes addiction to pain meds is a serious problem. But it's not the place of Walgreens to decide
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:18 PM
Jul 2014

who gets the meds and who doesn't. That is between the patients and their doctors.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
29. Well, at least when we get recreational pot in every state,
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:04 PM
Jul 2014

that will alleviate a lot of the pain med under-prescription. When it's legal, I intend to grow one plant indoors under a grow light upstairs - just enough for the occasional pan of brownies. And not let word get out around here because that's begging home invasion. Since I stared down the local militia, nobody's made another peep about bothering me any way at all, and I don't intend to attract trouble.

 

Indydem

(2,642 posts)
23. Holy Shit - This bullshit story still has legs?
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:30 PM
Jul 2014

Walgreens is NOT looking to move offshore!

A group of shareholders totaling 5% ownership asked them to look into it at their annual meeting.

That does NOT mean Walgreens wants to do this, or that it will.

Read something besides propaganda for the love of God.

http://www.minyanville.com/trading-and-investing/stocks/articles/Walgreens-Stakeholders-Pushing-For-Company-to/4/17/2014/id/54652

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
32. If they have NO intention of moving, don't you think it would be better business to say so ASAP?
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:10 PM
Jul 2014

You can't blame people for getting in an uproar when companies even let a devilish demand like offshoring go unanswered for so long. If I wanted to keep customers, I'd get out in front of a 'rumor' and quash it immediately.

Walgreens hasn't even offered a weak denial that I know of, so don't snap the whip over people for getting riled at the possibility in an effort to make yourself seem like the only adult in the room. I'm 68 and I say raise hell with corporate HQ to make sure they don't decide against Americans.

No apology either, btw.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
24. I haven't been near them in years. But I agree with you.
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:46 PM
Jul 2014

As for more independent or regional pharmacies being unable to compete on prices, I've learned that where there's a Walgreens nearby, the others will do wonders to keep their customers.

Stuart G

(38,421 posts)
26. This article in Crain's Chicago Business, July 7,2014 implies there has NOT been a vote to move yet
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 03:50 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140705/ISSUE01/307059979/will-walgreens-chicago-board-members-vote-for-a-move#

I think the vote to move or stay will be in August. There is pressure to move, but I would assume there is also strong pressure to stay in their current location because of the history of being a Chicago based corporation. The article says that their is a potential to save over 700 million if the company moves, but the board of directors has made no decision yet.

This is the most recent issue of Crain's and has no mention of a vote to move...

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/section/issue

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
37. And that's why we need to keep the pressure on them, through boycott and letters
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:20 PM
Jul 2014

"Inversion"—moving headquarters to a lower-taxed country, usually by buying a company in that country and making the subsidiary the parent--is becoming much more common practice of large corporations. A lot of inversions have occurred in recent years. For many of the companies, there's little incentive NOT to do this. But Walgreen's is different: it interacts with the public, and public reaction and anger could prevent them from doing this.

By the way, whether they "move" their headquarters to Switzerland or not, they will still be Chicago-based in terms of personnel, offices, and facilities. The inversion is really on paper only. The CEOs and other corporate honchos are not required to move to Switzerland and do their business from there. That is done by the subsidiary company. It's a "paper" move. And it's so easy to do, there's no reason for them not to, unless the public tells them that they will not reward their greed.

Pisces

(5,599 posts)
33. I agree 100% I will take my dollars to CVS. I'm surprised more Republicans aren't on this shop
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:12 PM
Jul 2014

America bandwagon.

Mike Nelson

(9,953 posts)
38. Thank you all for an informative thread...
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 04:21 PM
Jul 2014

...tho they are #2 in Dem donations, I'm going with CVS for not selling tobacco.
...happy if Walgreens is not moving, but they give too much to Republicans.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
44. I hate to say this, but Walgreen's is the cheapest
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 06:02 PM
Jul 2014

for cigarettes. I am a smoker and only buy my cigarettes from Walgreen's. But many of their other products are more expensive than Kroger's drug department.

vanlassie

(5,670 posts)
42. I hate CVS with a passion. Partly because they bought out
Sat Jul 26, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jul 2014

California based Longs Drugs and trashed them. Laid shity smelly carpet, cheap products, cheap wages. Previous Longs employees were really upset and so was I, on their behalf. I prefer Rite Aid. Or local, but that's pretty much only a dream.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Time to boycott Walgreens