Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
  Post removed Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:03 AM Aug 2014

Post removed

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JI7

(93,617 posts)
1. the article was on jewish school kids in australia and people bring up the israeli/palestinian
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:08 AM
Aug 2014

conflict to excuse what they did.

i personally blame israel and particularly the netanyahu right wing govt more for hte problems there right now. but there is no excuse to attack school kids and anyone who does so is an anti semite.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
2. Darn. I thought this thread was going to be about how wrong the
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:09 AM
Aug 2014

use of the term, "anti-Semitic" is.

I KNOW it was originally coined to mean someone who hates Jews, but it was wrong then and is wrong now. Many people who aren't of the Jewish faith are Semitic. While it does come from the name, "Shem," who was the son of Noah (allegedly), it still includes: the ancient and modern forms of Ahlamu, Akkadian (Assyrian-Babylonian), Amharic, Ammonite, Amorite, Arabic, Aramaic/Syriac, Canaanite (Phoenician/Carthaginian/Hebrew), Chaldean, Eblaite, Edomite, Ge'ez, Maltese, Mandaic, Moabite, Sutean, Tigre and Tigrinya, and Ugaritic, among others.

Maybe if we reconsidered the term, it would help define what we mean?

JI7

(93,617 posts)
4. we know exactly what it means in the way we are discussing it , one could look up monkey
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:11 AM
Aug 2014

and look the definition is and claim there is nothing about black people and racism therefore when people portray blacks as monkeys it's not racist.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
5. Well, that's exactly my point.
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:17 AM
Aug 2014

I think the term was coined incorrectly in the first place because there ARE others who aren't of the Jewish faith who are, in fact, Semitic; however, there is no man who is a monkey.

Unless you believe in Bigfoot.

Seriously, you didn't get what I meant?

Response to Post removed (Original post)

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. I don't want the term to lose meaning
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:17 AM
Aug 2014

but when it gets applied to people that are just criticizing the Israeli government, it diminishes the meaning.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
9. That's what I meant, above, too.
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:20 AM
Aug 2014

It's hard to use the phrase when more and more people realize it doesn't only applies to people of the Jewish faith and that it applies to a variety other people.

I should be able to criticize ANY government without being called a name implying that I'm in any way bigoted, particularly when the name has been misused for decades anyway.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. Didn't they need that in a Star Trek episode?
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:19 AM
Aug 2014

..for the semite, anti-semite reactor that made the engines run?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed