Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(33,688 posts)
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 11:15 AM Aug 2014

Why do we not hear political rhetoric like this anymore?

“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.” Abraham Lincoln

“The essence of any struggle for healthy liberty has always been . . . to take from some one man or class of men the right to enjoy power, or wealth, or position, or immunity, which has not been earned by service to his or their fellows.

The Constitution guarantees protections to property, and we must make that promise good. But it does not give the right of suffrage to any corporation. The true friend of property, the true conservative, is he who insists that property shall be the servant and not the aster of the commonwealth, who insists that the creature is of man's making shall be the servant and not the master of the man who made it. The citizens of the United States must effectively control the mighty commercial forces which they have themselves called into being.

(The people must insist on) complete and effective publicity of corporate affairs [and a law prohibiting the use of corporate funds directly or indirectly for political purposes.

I rank dividends below human character. If our political institutions were perfect, they would absolutely prevent the political domination of money in any part of our affairs We need to make our political representatives more quickly and sensitively responsive to the people whose servants they are . . . It is particularly important that all moneys received or expended for campaign purposes, not only after election, but before election as well . . .”

Theodore Roosevelt, The “New Nationalism” speech, Denver, Colorado, 29 August, 1910

One of the principle features of TR's New Nationalism was a call for “a judiciary that favored individual over property rights.” Edmund Morris, Colonel Roosevelt, p, 109 (2010).

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why do we not hear political rhetoric like this anymore? (Original Post) hifiguy Aug 2014 OP
In our dumbed-down society, those remarks would LuvNewcastle Aug 2014 #1
As a society, we are entertaining ourselves into the extinction we deserve. hifiguy Aug 2014 #2
I agree. LuvNewcastle Aug 2014 #3


(16,894 posts)
1. In our dumbed-down society, those remarks would
Thu Aug 7, 2014, 11:44 AM
Aug 2014

go right over the heads of at least half of the people. If it's longer than a tweet, forget about getting people to grasp it. Would they even know the difference between labor and capital? Would they even know what the words mean?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do we not hear politi...