Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:16 PM Aug 2014

Hillary Clinton, Barbed and Bellicose


The other night, a prominent Democrat I know made the craziest statement.

“I don’t think Hillary’s going to run,” he proclaimed, silencing the room. He might as well have said that he’d just spotted Bigfoot pilfering rhubarb from the White House vegetable garden or that Arnold Schwarzenegger was in line to play Lear on Broadway. (“Cordelia, I’ll be baaaaack.”) He was humming some kind of loony tune.


His evidence?

“She seems tired,” he said, and that’s when all of us cracked up. Oh, yeah, she seems positively exhausted. That explains the juggernaut of a book tour, the CNN town hall and all the other interviews, including the doozy with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, which I’ll turn to in a bit. If there was nap time in there, I missed it.

Without yet becoming president, she has ascended to some level of saturation exposure that’s above and beyond omnipresent. At this point she’s practically ambient. Her “inevitability” may boil down to the fact that no one can imagine a political ecosystem — nay, a habitable environment! — without her. When it comes to the Clintons, we apparently have two choices. Put them on Rushmore, or put them back in the White House.

And yet.

She is walking a tightrope, and the challenge and peril of it become clearer all the time. The question isn’t whether she’s running: Of course she is, and the only newsworthy announcement down the road would be that she’s getting out of the race. The question is whether she can belittle Barack Obama as much as she must in order to win, but not so much that it plays as an act of sheer betrayal.

She needs the voters who elected him, twice, and who maintain affection for him. She also needs the voters in the throes of buyer’s remorse. Many of them jilted her for their romance with him and now see it as a heady but heedless affair. Can she exploit that, but in a high-minded, diplomatic fashion?

More at NYT...good read...

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/12/opinion/hillary-clinton-barbed-and-bellicose.html?action=click&contentCollection=Opinion&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
2. Did she ever come up with an organizing principle after all that bloviating condescension?
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:31 PM
Aug 2014

I have one for her: Don't say stupid stuff.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
7. Why does no one remember "It's the economy, stupid"? I thought
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:45 PM
Aug 2014

that was the Clintons' famous slogan back when. Apparently THAT was suitable for a great nation.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
3. She is tired and tiring ...
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:37 PM
Aug 2014

... and I think she will implode early in the primary season against a 'mainstream' challenger running to her left (which won't even be very far left).

That said, I think the likelihood of her running has diminished since her book came out: she is too rich; too old; too conservative; too elite for a 2016 Democratic Party that is going to want a real populist fighter after eight years of 'No Drama Obama' and the reactionary, obstructionist Repuglican Congress.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
4. IMHO, the "voters in the throes of buyer's remorse" with respect to Obama
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:38 PM
Aug 2014

are NOT EVER going to consider her as a step up from Obama. How could they? She is to the right of Obama at this very moment; no one could possibly think that she would be progressive, could they? If so, well, people are so stupid that they deserve what they get. It's too bad the rest of us will go down the toilet, too.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
8. She was S of S while all this bad policy was taking place
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:45 PM
Aug 2014

And yet she presents no evidence that she lifted a finger to prevent any of it.

It's 20/20 hindsight, Monday morning quarterbacking and a snail trail of typical Clinton slime.

She seems to have forgotten why primary voters rejected her in 08 and at this rate she's going to be seriously overexposed by 2016.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. She pushed for a bigger Afghan surge. I don't remember her input much at all
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 12:49 PM
Aug 2014

on securing troops in Iraq beyond 2011. She pushed to topple Qaddafi. She pushed to topple Mubarak and supported Morsi/Muslim Brotherhood. She teamed up with her ever-loyal little buddy Panetta (who somehow managed to be by her side in various capacities for four years, even though I'm not sure he knew diddly-shit about anything but insider politics) and her crush Petraeus to do hinky shit with arms to rebels. She's forever in thrall to McCain and the neocons. She owns much of what went wrong from the first term, that Obama is now steering away from.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
10. I'm glad you brought up Petraeus
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:08 PM
Aug 2014

A few months back there was a post here on DU reacting to a prediction that William Kristol made on fox news where he said that if she got the nomination she would select Petraeus as her VP running mate.

Of course everybody ridiculed the statement because it was made by an idiot.

But even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day or something like that. In light of what she's done since then I wouldn't be surprised if she actually did something that dumb. She's amazingly unaware of how out of touch she is with not only Democratic primary voters but the electorate in general.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
11. She revealed that after he left in disgrace, she had dinner with him
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 01:13 PM
Aug 2014

and was trying to buck him up because she knows all about cheatin' men or some such crap. Something truly smells about those two. Not affair-wise, but covering each other's backs for whatever went down in Libya/Benghazi and Syria. Which Obama probably never knew about.

 

JaydenD

(294 posts)
14. I don't understand how she is called intelligent and brilliant.
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 07:33 PM
Aug 2014

I consider her more on the stupid side with the idiotic things she ends up saying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton, Barbed a...