General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEven if Brown did commit robbery...
And even if he did assault the clerk, what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him? Just the policeman's word?
[IMG][/IMG]

Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)does not mean that it is OK to summarily execute them.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Store footage shows different clothes than he was murdered in.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)WARNING: Graphic photo at link. (Close the space between dot and jpg.)
http://www.policestateusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/michael-brown-1. jpg
TYY
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)You think he shaved it off immediately after the robbery?
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)I believe that Michael Brown was murdered and I sincerely doubt that he had anything to do with 'stolen cigars.' I'm firmly on Michael Brown's side and that of his family and the people of Ferguson.
I don't know about facial hair. I haven't looked at the images from that perspective. My comment was about the clothing in the video as compared to the crime scene photo. They look to be the same to me. His shorts are down to his thighs in the crime scene photo and they appear to be 'sagging' in the store video. The color and style of shirt, shorts and shoes appear to be the same.
TYY
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)In the pics posted in the thread the shoes are those ugly slider sandals that a lot of guys wear. In the picture of him lying dead on the pavement, I can't make out the shoes clearly.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)SaltyBro
(198 posts)We all did stupid stuff when we were younger, we didn't get shot for it.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)It indicates that we may not have an accurate description of Michael Brown as a gentle giant as Rev. Sharpton described him.
There isn't enough evidence to say yet where the fault lies. A full inquiry may not result in the expected result of the cop being a racist murdered as many assume.
You say everybody does stupid things as a kid. What it one of his stupid things was trying to treat the cop like the pictures indicated he treated the store clerk? The person in these photos shows a willingness to shove people around.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Showed him dead wearing pants sneakers.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...have been pulled down to his thighs in the crime scene photo.
TYY
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)needs no lame-arse "defenses" such as yours.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)It really is immaterial to whether or not the shooting was justified.
Atman
(31,464 posts)That's the question. Restrain him, take him to court, let him face justice. Dying for a petty crime is not "justice."
hamsterjill
(15,782 posts)This is definitely an assault. It is NOT okay to walk into a store and bully or harm a store clerk.
Let's not even go there. It is NOT okay to grab someone by their clothes and push them around. It is NOT okay to pass that type of behavior off as "stupid stuff" that younger people do.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I'd damn well consider it an assault
phil89
(1,043 posts)You're really not helping. Would you think that was on to do to someone in your family?? Unbelievable
randome
(34,845 posts)It doesn't excuse what happened but without solid visual evidence of one sort or another...this is all messed up.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Most people will go to their default opinions - i.e. "This proves that Brown was guilty." or "This just shows how corrupt and desperate the police are." I don't know - it seems like there are a lot of issues around how this police department handled this case and their relationship with the community they are supposed to be protecting. That's not in doubt even if Brown's guilt/innocence is.
Bryant
randome
(34,845 posts)Cameras on all public servants. The vast majority do their jobs but we need more accountability.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)It is complicated
I don't want to think about it
But being a good citizen means you have to think about complicated things you don't want to think about sometimes. Even more so for a public official.
Bryant
hamsterjill
(15,782 posts)I see that very thing happening here on DU this morning.
Wouldn't it be a unique situation if minds were not made up until the investigation - a REAL investigation - was conducted and completed.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)There are witnesses but their credibility can be called into question.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)There is no way that the two are the same person, if they are basing it by clothes.
The color of the pants alone, as well as the shoes are completely different.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)From the Red Cap, to the shoes, to the length and color of the "shorts/pants". It just does not look the same to me.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)100% match.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Which has the photo.
The shoes are different, the pants are completely different and a much lighter color.
No "Red" baseball cap either.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Could have come off when he was trying to get away from the murdering cop, too.
Pants are identical, just a bit lower on his body than in the store.
Sandals are precisely identical. In fact, I'd call it unique. There's no way there would be two people with such identical footwear in photos taken within 30 minutes of each other.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)The pants, are definitely different, the one in the store is far far darker.
Regardless, I think we both agree that even if he was the person in the store (which I don't think should matter, and I still don't think he is(I may yet be proven wrong)), this does not excuse or diminish the liability of the police officer, or how wrong this is.
Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Either way, I can't go with 100% certainty.
Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)with the dark underwear peeking out - and then look at the death photo, where the pants have fallen down further. You can also count the white bands in the sandals - there are 5 in both the death photo and the crime scene.
You're fooling yourself if you don't see a striking similarity.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)That word comes from the attorney for Dorian Johnson, speaking to MSNBC. Police in Ferguson had earlier announced that Brown was suspected of taking cigars from the convenience store in what was described as a "strong-arm robbery."
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/15/attorney-dorian-johnson-michael-brown-robbery/14118769/
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Cheap surveillance cameras don't have a lot of dynamic range, and the scene in the store is backlit.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Don't think it is.
There is always that possibility, which is why I may be wrong, but it just doesn't look the same to me.
Even when you consider the light of the store.
What I do want to see is more on the upper left hand corner, which gives the time and date of the cameras.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because the officer at the scene was not detaining him on suspicion of the robbery in the first place.
The point is that even if it was him, the use of deadly force was not justified.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I just dislike this character assasination when it isn't even proven.
gblady
(3,552 posts)a dispute over jaywalking.....nothing mentioned about stealing.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)is whether the officer had seen the robbery scene photos - or had heard a description of the pair.
Shooting him was inexcusable, and from everything I have heard the officer should be relieved of duty and charged with some form of murder/manslaughter.
But if the police officer had reason to believe (because he had seen the photos, had heard the descriptions, or possibly even recognized the individuals) that he was encountering two individuals who had (at a minimum) just assaulted a store owner, the heat of the initial interaction over jaywalking is at least more understandable.
Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)Tan pants, falling somewhere between knee and ankle, shoes with alternating light and dark stripes, a white/light color shirt.
Are you perhaps confusing the color of his dark underwear (very visible in the death photo) with the color of his pants? (Not to mention that the dark underwear from the death scene is also peeking out above his shorts in the bottom left photo from the robbery scene.
We don't have to weave unbelievable tales about how it might be someone else, or it was, but it was just "dumb stuff" - not assault/battery/robbery. Even if absolutely true, none of those justify the police killing - any more than being a prostitute would justify rape.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Correct. It does not seem that the officer was detaining him for that incident in the first place.
Ms. Toad
(36,758 posts)about whether the officer who shot him was aware of his alleged involvement in the robbery. If he was, it would shed some light on what appeared to be a major overreaction to jaywalking.
It doesn't justify shooting - but an officer who believed he was encountering someone who was encountering someone he believed to have just robbed a store in an altercation which included a physical interaction has more reason to be wary than someone chasing kids out of the street.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Cop got to be judge and jury and handed down a sentence of immediate execution while the kid had his hands in the air.
JustAnotherGen
(34,765 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)hamsterjill
(15,782 posts)But he shouldn't be stealing things from a convenience store either, or assaulting a store clerk. That applies to whomever is depicted in the still photos, whether it be Michael Brown or someone who looks like Michael Brown.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Response to JJChambers (Reply #23)
PowerToThePeople This message was self-deleted by its author.
Atman
(31,464 posts)But Brown is still dead.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)the brain and the typing fingers had a disconnect.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)The Cop will get off for murder,and nothing will happen to him Inless justice department pursures civil rights violations charges.
If Michael Brown's friend did tell FBI he did take the cigars I am inclinded to believe him although he denyed it was strong armed robbery.
I don't care if he sold cigars or not.This doesn't justify murder or the reaction by Police to protests.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the picture because he did not have time to go home and change? Did he have anything on him that he had stolen in this robbery? There has to be more proof that a picture of a big black man pushing a clerk around. Is the person he was walking with in these pictures any where?
And even if it is him the policeman still has no right to play judge, jury and executioner.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)He had received a radio call.
There is no way he could be confident he was stopping the right guy
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)A clothing and physical description (Brown was 6'4, 300 lbs), and the proximity to the crime scene, direction of travel, etc, could all have added up to the officer having plenty of reason to stop and identify Brown. Brown's reaction to that legal stop is what remains disputed.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)on a hot day, and have a look round to see how many people match or are close to the type of generic description used in such police broadcasts.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)He had just committed a robbery.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Not just spout the party line.
You have no evidence whatsoever it was the same person. All you have 4 grainy images of someone wearing similar clothes to Brown and the Officer who shot him did not even have those.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Same height, weight, clothing, and his friend (the witness to the shooting, Mr. Johnson, who was also involved in the robbery, confirmed it was him as well to the FBI).
intaglio
(8,170 posts)And again the officer who shot HAD NOT SEEN THE VIDEO.
A man was executed and the best excuse that the police can come up with is that the shots were fired on the suspicion that he might have been involved in a robbery.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)These are cherry-picked stills. The young man tried to leave the store and was rudely accosted by the clerk. I for one can't blame him for pushing back.
phil89
(1,043 posts)Was in the wrong there. Just a smaller guy getting pushed around for rightly trying to defend his store.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)He couldn't even leave the store without being accused of something and accosted. If anyone should be charged with anything, its the clerk.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)The clerk didnt stop him for being black he stopped him for stealing merchandise.
Response to Travis_0004 (Reply #68)
Post removed
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Its just the clerks word.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)If he was attempting to purchase tobacco products and did not have ID, that could also lead to a confrontation of some kind.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)JJChambers
(1,115 posts)The clothing and height and weight match.
The reason it doesn't look like the pictures we have seen of Brown, who was an adult, not a child, is because the pictures released are from when he was younger.
uponit7771
(92,769 posts)Where is the claim by mikes friend?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Mojo Electro
(362 posts)It really seemed this time like we would finally make some progress on the police state in America. People were waking up, and were outraged.
That will probably all go out the window now, while all the boot lickers say "SEE???"
It really, really sucks.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Mojo Electro
(362 posts)then maybe we'll have a chance.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)Mojo Electro
(362 posts)It's still possible that this office will be held accountable.
I still hold out hope that what happened with Al Jazeera will reap consequences.
Bit this was our best shot.
Sad.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That's not a difficult question to eventually resolve on the basis of forensic evidence.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)So if the autopsy evidence shows, for example, wounds on Brown's knuckles, you would say that the police officer faked them?
I think one of the witnesses would have noticed the police officer getting out of the car to fake wounds on Brown's hands, don't you?
When you punch someone, you bruise your knuckles. The edema is going to progress.
If you punch someone, and shortly thereafter your circulatory system stops, the wound to your knuckles is pretty much going to establish the time interval between when you punched someone and when your circulatory system stopped.
In other words, the condition of the wound you would have on your hand from punching someone yesterday, versus punching them a minute ago, are different.
JJChambers
(1,115 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)"what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him? Just the policeman's word?"
Answers to those questions are:
1. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated fresh offensive wounds, it would be evidence of him having recently hit someone.
2. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated absence of offensive wounds, one would have to ask a medical examiner whether that meant he did not hit someone.
I am not a medical examiner. Finding "something" may be indicative of "something". Finding "nothing" may or may not be indicative of "something" or "nothing".
Your question was directed to whether there could be any evidence of him "beating the policeman". Yes, there can be evidence of having beat someone, and how long ago one may have beat someone.
It is also important to understand what the word "evidence" means, as distinguished from what the word "proof" means, since people tend to confuse the use of those two words.
As to "Is it possible to hit someone and not sustain an injury?" I have no earthly idea. Many things are "possible". As a proposition, I would believe, absent further education on the point, that if one person was to hit another person without a weapon in a manner sufficient to inflict injury, then it seems likely one would have a corresponding injury of some kind.
Physics doesn't care if you slam your face into my fist, or whether I slam my fist into your face. Either way, it is a collision between bones wrapped in skin.
Various kinds of physical confrontations are reconstructed or rendered more or less likely from physical evidence all of the time, and some wounds can be characterized as defensive (such as stab wounds on the palms of a person trying to avoid being stabbed) or offensive (such as bruising to the knuckles of someone who has punched someone else).
It may also be that the evidence is indeterminate. If your skin is found under my fingernails, I may have been trying to restrain you, or I may have been trying to scratch you.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)Another "good kill" because if a black kid isn't immaculate, if there is any possible room to take any imaginable reach at a theory to back a cop then it is taken like a fucking highway.
Any "boxes in the garage" will do, if your black and your transformation to "thug" will be complete.