General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTicks That Can Make People Severely Allergic To Meat Are Spreading In The U.S.
Mike Abley will always remember the last hamburger he ever ate. It was more than 20 years ago, and he recalls the meat being particularly juicy and delicious.
But a few hours after dinner, Abley started itching like mad. He burst into hives, his tongue swelled, and he eventually passed out, prompting his wife to call 911. At the hospital, doctors determined he had gone into anaphylactic shocka potentially deadly allergic reaction.
Fortunately, Abley pulled through, and he later met with an allergist to determine what had caused the terrifying episode. A series of tests revealed something strange: The hamburger had triggered the reaction. And it wasnt just the beef he was allergic to; it was practically all red meat.
Abley is one of at least 1,500 people in the United States who suffer allergic reactions after eating meat, and doctors interviewed by Popular Science believe such cases are on the rise. But whats even more bizarre is the source of the allergy. The condition, called alpha-gal allergy, is caused by the bite of a Lone Star ticka species traditionally found mostly in the Southern United States but has spread farther north in recent years.
And as the tick spreads, more and more cases of meat allergies are being reported. In one area of Long Island, New York, for example, one doctor we spoke with has seen and increase of 200 cases in the past three yearsup from practically zero in 2011.
?itok=TqBvGpUR
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/ticks-can-make-people-severely-allergic-meat-are-spreading-us?src=SOC&dom=fb
Lars39
(26,117 posts)He can't have pork, either. He hasn't quite accepted his diagnosis yet. He had a reaction to some soup that he ate that he knew "just had a little bit of beef in it!"
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Lars39
(26,117 posts)He's lucky the doctor knew about it or it could have just been brushed off as a reaction to MSG.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)It has been pointed out to me that this blog post is satire. I couldn't tell the difference.
Just as leeches purify the blood, these tiny insects can help people kick a habit that sucks for animals, human health, and the environment, says Beleav. Obviously, PETAs main goal is to prevent animal suffering, but going vegetarian or vegan helps people lose weight, boosts their immune systems, and lowers their risk of three of our nations biggest killersheart disease, cancer, and strokes. Beleav continues, Really the only pushback we anticipate will be from fast-food companies. Maybe McDonalds will start handing out free flea and tick collars with its value meals!
PETA is also considering offering the bugs by mail for anyone itching to go vegetarian but lacking the willpower to do so.
Read more: http://www.peta.org/blog/peta-release-meat-allergy-inducing-ticks/#ixzz3AfVICNJ9
What is wrong with these people? No concern here that people might actually die from anaphylactic shock?
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)What's the difference between this and intentionally exposing people to ebola or AIDS?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Hong Kong Cavalier
(4,573 posts)The biologist's name is "Don Beleav" (Don't believe).
It is rather sad when an organization's attempt at humor is so close to their actual tactics that it becomes difficult to ascertain what's real and what's not.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)The "biologist" is named "Don Beleav."
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Organizations that have been accused of eco-terrorism in the United States include the Animal Liberation Front (ALF),[7] the Earth Liberation Front (ELF),[7] Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Earth First!.[13] The Coalition to Save the Preserves.[27] and the Hardesty Avengers.[28] In 2010, the FBI was criticized in U.S. Justice Department reports for unjustified surveillance (and placement on the Terrorism Watchlist) between 2001 and 2006 of members of animal-rights groups such as Greenpeace and PETA.[29]
Once you are on that list you never get off of it.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I think I've contributed to several of those, and been a dues paying member to one or two in the past.
Oh well, it's not like I didn't already expect to have an FBI file.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I support Greenpeace. I might want to see if I am there too
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I worked there at the time they were illegally investigated (meaning, I was probably illegally investigated too). They got on the watch list because they gave bail money to a member of ALF. That's it.
It's worrisome that you can end up on a list like because of paying someone's bail.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Because it would violate the rights of the ticks.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,892 posts)Or ticks competing with us for their food source.
disclaimer
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zazen
(2,978 posts)The whole Lyme undertreatment and underdiagnosis is a scandal, twisted by a seriously screwed up small group of people with IDSA. Since a lot of money is potentially on the line with STARI, maybe these companies will pour much-needed research into tick transmitted diseases and actually friggin' help people (from a seropositive Lyme patient who "couldn't get Lyme in North Carolina" and therefore went undiagnosed for 12 months). Grrrr.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)plague lands. Warm water full of bacteria, flesh eating parasites.
'Cheat' Grass (wildfire tinder) full of chiggers if the cheatgrass spears don't pierce your skin and all the overgrown brush/weeds full of hungry ticks, left behind when cattle and sheep, trampled & stripped roots with native grass. full of hungry ticks.
Amazing what a short 150 years of grazing pressure did to our pristine lands.!! And how fast insects evolve.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)oh no Mr. Bill
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Pig: "Look, dude, I know both sides!"
Tick: "Bro, I know all sides."
frazzled
(18,402 posts)as long as you're not bitten by another one of these specific ticks. And of course, the allergy is only to mammalian meat products. You can still have poultry and fish.
So the good news is: it's not permanent, and it doesn't mean you can't eat chicken, turkey, or fish.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)Like that scratch test the use to test for other allergies
mucifer
(23,577 posts)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743512
This stuff is serious!
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I never said it wasn't serious. All food allergies can be serious.
mucifer
(23,577 posts)For some people it can recede. I just want to make that point clear.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)You can get an anaphylactic reaction from a bee sting, from latex gloves, from shelfish, or from peanuts if you become allergic to any of these things: and you can die. But that has nothing to do with the fact that this particular allergy is thought--universally--to recede over time; that is to say: the antibody levels have been found to drop over time. (Of course, I wouldn't eat red meat ever again if I had contracted this allergy, because it's just not worth it; I became allergic to peanuts in the 1970s: I suspect I am no longer deadly allergic to them after nearly forty years, but I wouldn't go near a peanut if my life depended on it: the very smell makes me ill from association with my earlier horrible reactions.)
I do not understand what your objection to my (true) statement is. ALL ALLERGIES CAN LEAD TO ANAPHYLAXIS. This tick-derived allergy to red meat can, too. It's a serious condition if undiagnosed. Like all allergies. That has nothing to do with its progression.
I am allergic to peanuts. My mother is deadly allergic to insect bites and has almost died several times from them. I understand the seriousness of allergies. But this has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that with the tick-induced allergy, the antibody levels do recede over a period of years.
Got that?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I never heard of such a thing before...
valerief
(53,235 posts)20 years (and I don't eat Jell-O or non-veg gelatin capsules), so I don't know know if I've been ticked. Don't want to find out either. Ick!
Thanks for the post!
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,307 posts)Lisa0825
(14,487 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Hun Joro
(666 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hun Joro
(666 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)They'll probably be working like crazy to find an antidote for it, with mad cow they just sweep it under the carpet. They can get away with that because the effects come so far into the future. My own theory is that many cases of dementia are actually mad cow.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 18, 2014, 03:42 AM - Edit history (1)
arikara
(5,562 posts)but keep in mind you can catch mad cow even if the meat is cooked. Its caused by a prion that isn't damaged by heat. Apparently, even autoclaving doesn't destroy it which is part of the reason why they are hesitant to open up the brain in order to diagnose. ...that and they don't want to harm the beef industry.
A middle aged woman died of it recently in our town and it was diagnosed. It was kept very hush-hush but small town, word got out locally.
I'm sorry about your husband, my dad is in care with dementia and has been for 10 years.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)scary about the townswoman, for sure.
We knew something bad was possible when we became part of the group not allowed to give blood, for spending too much time in the UK back in the 80's. Gave up all things beef then.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)mnhtnbb
(31,409 posts)about a year ago. After one late night visit to the ER, the doc suggested testing
for the alpha-gal sensitivity and it came up positive.
She is having a helluva time managing her diet--especially when going out to eat.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)It really depends. You have to get really good at reading the labelling on food, because a lot of products you might not think of have meat extract etc. In addition, many will have to suffer through idiotic friends and family who refuse to understand that you cannot eat certain things. They pressure you to just try it, and try to convince you it's all in your head. To compound that, a lot of restaurants have less than well-educated cooks and waiters who think that just picking the offending item out the dish will suffice.
The very worst are the stories I hear of people with food issues whose friends hide said food in what they serve to "prove" that they are not allergic or intolerant. As someone who is intolerant to shellfish - I don't go into anaphylactic shock, but spend the night throwing up instead - that is a nightmare.
kickitup
(355 posts)and there is a certain ingredient that is animal derived that breaks him out in a horrible rash.
He's been living with this for about a year and his last test showed a lessening in his reaction. He loves the outdoors so he has to really watch the ticks now or it will be back to square one.
The hardest part for him has been finding hidden meat products in foods and products and making sure no cross-contamination occurs in restaurants or family cookouts. My mother cooks his turkey burgers before cooking hamburgers for others which helps a lot.
He eats a lot of fish, turkey, and chicken. Turkey hot dogs sometimes have mammalian products in the casings so you have to watch those. He carries an epi-pen and is very careful of what he consumes.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I stopped in one day after deciding to become a vegetarian. And I have never regretted it. Sometimes though I get a craving to have a juicy sirloin steak. Maybe before I die, I just might give in to the craving.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)DFW
(54,448 posts)Ever since my cardiac near-miss ten years ago, I was told to avoid red meat entirely, so I did (and have).
Now, if this extends to fish or cranberries, I'm in trouble......
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)A tick forcing us to behave well.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)That's good for the environment and of course the animals. It's been 41 years since I ate meat so it can be done.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)you know you have it, are always good!<DRIPPING WITH SARCASM>
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)SQUEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)"You can't look at smut--you're miners."
mucifer
(23,577 posts)The world is just changing. These anaphylactic reactions to food weren't so prevalent in the '70s or earlier. But, one could say we don't have polio now pediatric cancers are more under control. As we cure some things mother nature finds other ways to do us in.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Not red meat, though.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Future headline. You heard it here first.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)the Texas Tick's sources of food, which is mainly herbivore blood.
Or maybe genetically modified cows are smarter than we could ever know.
villager
(26,001 posts)...one of the most climate-wrecking "products," in industrial-raised red meat?
Nature really does bat last.