General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsICREACH: How the NSA Built Its Own Secret Google
@ggreenwald: ICREACH has records on "millions of records on American citizen" & is shared "with domestic agencies like the FBI" https://t.co/1p09R1AylM/s/NKYu
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/08/25/icreach-nsa-cia-secret-google-crisscross-proton/
The Surveillance Engine: How the NSA Built Its Own Secret Google
By Ryan Gallagher
25 Aug 2014, 1:09 PM EDT
The National Security Agency is secretly providing data to nearly two dozen U.S. government agencies with a Google-like search engine built to share more than 850 billion records about phone calls, emails, cellphone locations, and internet chats, according to classified documents obtained by The Intercept.
The documents provide the first definitive evidence that the NSA has for years made massive amounts of surveillance data directly accessible to domestic law enforcement agencies. Planning documents for ICREACH, as the search engine is called, cite the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration as key participants.
ICREACH contains information on the private communications of foreigners and, it appears, millions of records on American citizens who have not been accused of any wrongdoing. Details about its existence are contained in the archive of materials provided to The Intercept by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
Earlier revelations sourced to the Snowden documents have exposed a multitude of NSA programs for collecting large volumes of communications. The NSA has acknowledged that it shares some of its collected data with domestic agencies like the FBI, but details about the method and scope of its sharing have remained shrouded in secrecy.
- snip -
Legal experts told The Intercept they were shocked to learn about the scale of the ICREACH system and are concerned that law enforcement authorities might use it for domestic investigations that are not related to terrorism.
To me, this is extremely troublesome, said Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the New York University School of Laws Brennan Center for Justice. The myth that metadata is just a bunch of numbers and is not as revealing as actual communications content was exploded long agothis is a trove of incredibly sensitive information.
MORE
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
questionseverything
(9,654 posts)However, the documents make clear that it is not only data about foreigners communications that are available on the system. Alexanders memo states that many millions of
minimized communications metadata records would be available through ICREACH, a reference to the process of minimization, whereby identifying informationsuch as part of a phone number or email addressis removed so it is not visible to the analyst. NSA documents define minimization as specific procedures to minimize the acquisition and retention [of] information concerning unconsenting U.S. personsmaking it a near certainty that ICREACH gives analysts access to millions of records about Americans. The minimized information can still be retained under NSA rules for up to five years and unmasked at any point during that period if it is ever deemed necessary for an investigation.
The Brennan Centers Goitein said it appeared that with ICREACH, the government drove a truck through loopholes that allowed it to circumvent restrictions on retaining data about Americans. This raises a variety of legal and constitutional issues, according to Goitein, particularly if the data can be easily searched on a large scale by agencies like the FBI and DEA for their domestic investigations.
The idea with minimization is that the government is basically supposed to pretend this information doesnt exist, unless it falls under certain narrow categories, Goitein said. But functionally speaking, what were seeing here is that minimization means, well hold on to the data as long as we want to, and if we see anything that interests us then we can use it.
Javaman
(62,528 posts)terrorist.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Since the USA PATRIOT Act, those who object with the War on Terra Without End etc are now Enemies of the State.
ETA what Chris Hedges brought up from Hannah Arendt...
The Last Gasp of American Democracy
By Chris Hedges
TruthDig.org, Posted on Jan 5, 2014
EXCERPT...
The most radical evil, as Hannah Arendt pointed out, is the political system that effectively crushes its marginalized and harassed opponents and, through fear and the obliteration of privacy, incapacitates everyone else. Our system of mass surveillance is the machine by which this radical evil will be activated. If we do not immediately dismantle the security and surveillance apparatus, there will be no investigative journalism or judicial oversight to address abuse of power. There will be no organized dissent. There will be no independent thought. Criticisms, however tepid, will be treated as acts of subversion. And the security apparatus will blanket the body politic like black mold until even the banal and ridiculous become concerns of national security.
I saw evil of this kind as a reporter in the Stasi state of East Germany. I was followed by men, invariably with crew cuts and wearing leather jackets, whom I presumed to be agents of the Stasithe Ministry for State Security, which the ruling Communist Party described as the shield and sword of the nation. People I interviewed were visited by Stasi agents soon after I left their homes. My phone was bugged. Some of those I worked with were pressured to become informants. Fear hung like icicles over every conversation.
The Stasi did not set up massive death camps and gulags. It did not have to. The Stasi, with a network of as many as 2 million informants in a country of 17 million, was everywhere. There were 102,000 secret police officers employed full time to monitor the populationone for every 166 East Germans. The Nazis broke bones; the Stasi broke souls. The East German government pioneered the psychological deconstruction that torturers and interrogators in Americas black sites, and within our prison system, have honed to a gruesome perfection.
[font color="green"]The goal of wholesale surveillance, as Arendt wrote in The Origins of Totalitarianism, is not, in the end, to discover crimes, but to be on hand when the government decides to arrest a certain category of the population. And because Americans emails, phone conversations, Web searches and geographical movements are recorded and stored in perpetuity in government databases, there will be more than enough evidence to seize us should the state deem it necessary. This information waits like a deadly virus inside government vaults to be turned against us. It does not matter how trivial or innocent that information is. In totalitarian states, justice, like truth, is irrelevant. [/font green]
The object of efficient totalitarian states, as George Orwell understood, is to create a climate in which people do not think of rebelling, a climate in which government killing and torture are used against only a handful of unmanageable renegades. The totalitarian state achieves this control, Arendt wrote, by systematically crushing human spontaneity, and by extension human freedom. It ceaselessly peddles fear to keep a population traumatized and immobilized. It turns the courts, along with legislative bodies, into mechanisms to legalize the crimes of state.
CONTINUED...
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_last_gasp_of_american_democracy_20140105
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Wella
(1,827 posts)The technology looks as if it were almost built for fascism.
Rex
(65,616 posts)NSA = PONIES AND RAINBOWS...IGNORE, IGNORE...