Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IronGate

(2,186 posts)
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 12:45 PM Aug 2014

"Court: Cops Can't Claim Immunity after SWAT team fatally shot man while looking for cocaine".

A U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that Connecticut police cannot claim immunity to quash lawsuits seeking millions of dollars in damages from a botched 2008 raid by a SWAT team that severely injured a homeowner and killed his friend.

On May 18, 2008, a heavily armed SWAT — or special weapons and tactics — team unit knocked down Terebesi’s door, threw stun flash grenades into his Easton home and fatally shot 33-year-old Gonzalo Guizan of Norwalk as the two men watched television.
Guizan, who was visiting the home, died after being shot a half dozen times.
The SWAT team raided Terebisi's home because (I'm not kidding) a stripper told police she "had seen a small amount of cocaine in Terebisi's home". A small amount of drugs, but no guns were found in the search after the raid.
The SWAT team was made up of officers from five Connecticut towns-- officials in all five towns claim the "officers did not use excessive force, nor did they violate their constitutional rights".


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/27/court-cops-cant-claim-immunity-after-swat-team-fatally-shot-man-while-looking-for-cocaine/

Good ruling, and maybe this will start putting the brakes on the use of SWAT for minor raids.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Court: Cops Can't Claim Immunity after SWAT team fatally shot man while looking for cocaine". (Original Post) IronGate Aug 2014 OP
Sue for their pensions. n/t geomon666 Aug 2014 #1
It is a good ruling atreides1 Aug 2014 #2
You link is broken. Jokerman Aug 2014 #3
Thanks, I'll edit my thread. nt. IronGate Aug 2014 #4
That should give NY, CT & VT police departments pause Lurks Often Aug 2014 #5
How quickly will the Scalia court overturn this ruling? Orrex Aug 2014 #6
Ending the stupid and failed drug war is absolutely critical in reining in the police. TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #7

atreides1

(16,799 posts)
2. It is a good ruling
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:10 PM
Aug 2014

But I don't believe it's a start of anything! At best it's the exception to the rule and is unlikely to become a standard...

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
5. That should give NY, CT & VT police departments pause
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:48 PM
Aug 2014

although I expect an appeal to SCOTUS.

Since mayors, district attorneys and attorney generals aren't willing to do their job in keeping police from getting out of control, the courts will.

 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
7. Ending the stupid and failed drug war is absolutely critical in reining in the police.
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 01:54 PM
Aug 2014

To fail to do so probably makes any and every other action an exercise of pissing into the wind.

Got to get to the violence escalator out of the mix, loosen the grip of organized and gang crime, have to reduce encounters in general particularly ones with the sole purpose of finding something to react to, must restore priority to the rights of the people, get some of the perverse systemic financial incentives, and we sure as hell need to minimize the adversarial relationship between the public and these public servants.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Court: Cops Can't C...