General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Justices Possibly Misunderstood Insurance Requirement In Health Care
Supreme Court Justices Possibly Misunderstood Insurance Requirement In Health Care CaseA possible misunderstanding about President Barack Obama's health care overhaul could cloud Supreme Court deliberations on its fate, leaving the impression that the law's insurance requirement is more onerous than it actually is.
During the recent oral arguments some of the justices and the lawyers appearing before them seemed to be under the impression that the law does not allow most consumers to buy low-cost, stripped-down insurance to satisfy its controversial coverage requirement.
In fact, the law provides for a cheaper "bronze" plan that is broadly similar to today's so-called catastrophic coverage policies for individuals, several insurance experts said.
"I think there is confusion," said Paul Keckley, health research chief for Deloitte, a major benefits consultant. "I found myself wondering how much they understood the Affordable Care Act. Several times the questions led me to wonder how much (the justices') clerks had gone back into the law in advance of the arguments."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/obamacare-supreme-court-justices_n_1417154.html?ref=politics
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)gordianot
(15,798 posts)rfranklin
(13,200 posts)An outspoken Kentucky Democrat is directing an unusually pointed attack at a member of his own delegation. And not just any member the single biggest target.
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY) laid in to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in a letter delivered last week for misleading their mutual constituents about the facts and benefits of President Obamas health care law.
And in a follow-up interview, Yarmuth again attacked McConnell, his former ally, for putting partisan politics before representing the people of his state.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/kentucky-dem-broadsides-mitch-mcconnell-for-dishonesty-over-attacks-on-obamacare.php?ref=fpa
mike_c
(37,134 posts)...of providing adequate access to health care to every American? It sounds to me like the only thing it achieves is meeting the legal requirements of the ACA. Meh.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Not only do the Supremes not understand the mandate, they simply don't care.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)It would only be useful for people who are very wealthy and can afford most routine health care events.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.