Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:26 AM Sep 2014

why is internet so goddamn expensive in this country..

I thought of cutting the chord and going internet only ... The lowest price FiOS can give me is 74.99 (plus tax)

That is insane ... My cousin in the suburbs of London pays about a third (you read that right ...1/3 rd) after converting from pounds to dollars for roughly the same speed.

My only other alternative is Comcast and given the terrible customer servive( remember the call that went viral)and that they are really no cheaper ...I am reluctant to switch.

Basically I am screwed.

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
why is internet so goddamn expensive in this country.. (Original Post) srican69 Sep 2014 OP
We're in 'corporate' USA. No longer "home of the brave", but ass-kissers haven! dmosh42 Sep 2014 #1
Land of the corporate-owned slaves... liberalmuse Sep 2014 #4
or 'saber rattling chicken-hawks'! dmosh42 Sep 2014 #15
Virtual monopolies. Thom Hartman talks about how incredibly inexpensive telecom GoneFishin Sep 2014 #2
I doubt you can get fibre speeds for £15 a month Spider Jerusalem Sep 2014 #3
my speed is 25 Mbps . not a big deal really.nt srican69 Sep 2014 #55
I've been thinking the same thing, srican mike dub Sep 2014 #5
See my post #6 below, NC is involved n/t JHB Sep 2014 #9
Thanks JHB! mike dub Sep 2014 #13
Monopolies, amd they want to keep it that way. See related post... JHB Sep 2014 #6
Since when do they care what taxpayers pay? AllyCat Sep 2014 #23
It's "unregulated" monopolies! By deregulation phone and cable tv service in the 1980's and 1990's SharonAnn Sep 2014 #33
All utilities should be delivered as part of what we get for taxes Boreal Sep 2014 #49
I just fought with my cable company yesterday. JaneyVee Sep 2014 #7
You are in ....Manhattan? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #28
Are you with Comcast? SomethingFishy Sep 2014 #37
In USA, Inc., you are just a lowly disgruntled employee with no right to grievance RKP5637 Sep 2014 #8
It cost me 50 bucks a month plus the 20 the land line cost me for a total of 70 bucks madokie Sep 2014 #10
Mine is supposed to be $35 phone + $35 internet = $70, but plus taxes = $85 indie9197 Sep 2014 #52
The first honest cable company woo me with science Sep 2014 #11
+1000. Good One that I musta missed. Thanks for posting! adirondacker Sep 2014 #14
omg. its funny cos its true! Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #17
Boom! So true!!! nt valerief Sep 2014 #24
Hahahahaha! pa28 Sep 2014 #47
I have 3MB DSL because that's all that's available out here madville Sep 2014 #12
We live in the sticks. Satellite, cell or dial-up (haha!) are our only options. phylny Sep 2014 #16
That would be the solution TexasProgresive Sep 2014 #25
What my monthly bill looks like :( dickthegrouch Sep 2014 #18
"Service Protection Plan $3.99" ?? n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2014 #20
makes me want to cry. Voice for Peace Sep 2014 #22
I think that's protection from the mob dickthegrouch Sep 2014 #35
Have you checked the indie ISPs? There are a lot of them on the east coast Recursion Sep 2014 #19
Because governmental units granted so many companies area monopolies. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2014 #21
Government sanctioned monopoly. elleng Sep 2014 #26
I recently let a glib salesperson talk me out of my AT&T DSL and land line phone to 1monster Sep 2014 #27
crapitalism. pansypoo53219 Sep 2014 #29
And slow, too. n/t DirkGently Sep 2014 #30
Don't worry, Obama's got this - Tom Wheeler is FCC Chairman he is very, very, very whereisjustice Sep 2014 #31
Our internet is $47 for 26MB/4MB, 250MB usage cap Holly_Hobby Sep 2014 #32
Wow! What a miniscule cap. No streaming of anything, huh? eom TransitJohn Sep 2014 #36
We stream Roku, but only use about 100MB per month... Holly_Hobby Sep 2014 #41
I use over 250Mb / month just on my phone using Outlook, only TransitJohn Sep 2014 #42
I don't have a smart phone... Holly_Hobby Sep 2014 #45
That's not really germane to the point I was making, though TransitJohn Sep 2014 #46
All true, but we don't watch movies Holly_Hobby Sep 2014 #51
Then why dare you paying for Netflix? TransitJohn Sep 2014 #54
Sounds a lot like me marle35 Sep 2014 #50
Infrastructure fight daredtowork Sep 2014 #34
you raise an excellent and important point whereisjustice Sep 2014 #48
I thought San Francisco was about to do something like this daredtowork Sep 2014 #56
I think it's idiotic that municipalities don't just set up their own communications infrastructure DJ13 Sep 2014 #53
I saw in another thread daredtowork Sep 2014 #57
Why, don't you know it's the free market faerie at work? n/t markpkessinger Sep 2014 #38
A few companies with virtual monopolies price fixing... or at least agreeing to not have a price war JCMach1 Sep 2014 #39
same reason our healthcare is so expensive. It's been sold to psychopaths Doctor_J Sep 2014 #40
GREED! Profit over people. L0oniX Sep 2014 #43
I know NetZero Shankapotomus Sep 2014 #44

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)
1. We're in 'corporate' USA. No longer "home of the brave", but ass-kissers haven!
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:35 AM
Sep 2014

Last edited Mon Sep 1, 2014, 11:33 AM - Edit history (1)

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
2. Virtual monopolies. Thom Hartman talks about how incredibly inexpensive telecom
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:36 AM
Sep 2014

services are in some other countries. He also mentions that there are boat loads of companies competing for your business. Fewer games and restrictions, contracts, etc.. And dirt cheap process.

All the talk about the "free market" in the U.S. is lip service.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
3. I doubt you can get fibre speeds for £15 a month
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:38 AM
Sep 2014

it's around £30 a month for me (plus telephone line rental, because it's ADSL2+...which is fibre-to-the-cabinet and consistently delivers around 30Mbps down and 6Mbps up). That's about US$50 a month. Speeds are partly determined by distance from the cabinet or whether there's fibre to the premises. In some areas the speeds are up to 300Mbps, but the price is the same. And it's cheaper in the UK than in the USA because of population density, among other things. Higher population density makes high-speed infrastructure more cost-effective than the same infrastructure serving a medium-density US-style suburb.

mike dub

(541 posts)
5. I've been thinking the same thing, srican
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:51 AM
Sep 2014

Our internet only service to our house is also about 75 a month. Here in North Carolina, it's Time Warner Cable. I'd love to know how much profit these companies make off of us all, at 75 /month for internet.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
6. Monopolies, amd they want to keep it that way. See related post...
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:53 AM
Sep 2014
US cable giants call on FCC to block cities' expansion of high-speed internet
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5463539
The US cable industry called on the Federal Communications Commission on Friday to block two cities’ plans to expand high-speed internet services to their residents.

USTelecom, which represents cable giants Comcast, Time Warner and others, wants the FCC to block expansion of two popular municipally owned high speed internet networks, one in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and the other in Wilson, North Carolina.“The success of public broadband is a mixed record, with numerous examples of failures,” USTelecom said in a blog post. “With state taxpayers on the financial hook when a municipal broadband network goes under, it is entirely reasonable for state legislatures to be cautious in limiting or even prohibiting that activity.”

Chattanooga has the largest high-speed internet service in the US, offering customers access to speeds of 1 gigabit per second – about 50 times faster than the US average. The service, provided by municipally owned EPB, has sparked a tech boom in the city and attracted international attention. EPB is now petitioning the FCC to expand its territory. Comcast and others have previously sued unsuccessfully to stop EPB’s fibre optic roll out.

Wilson, a town of a little more than 49,000 people, launched Greenlight, its own service offering high speed internet, after complaints about the cost and quality of Time Warner cable’s service. Time Warner lobbied the North Carolina senate to outlaw the service and similar municipal efforts.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/29/us-telecoms-fcc-block-high-speed-internet-chattanooga

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
33. It's "unregulated" monopolies! By deregulation phone and cable tv service in the 1980's and 1990's
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 01:15 PM
Sep 2014

It used to be that they had to go before the utilities regulators to get approval to raise rates. Not any longer! Monoplies are allowed to charge whatever they want.

Deregulation, of course, was "needed to provide competition and decrease costs for consumers". How'd that work out?

 

Boreal

(725 posts)
49. All utilities should be delivered as part of what we get for taxes
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 08:43 PM
Sep 2014

And they should be publicly owned. Hire private contractors to build and maintain the infrastructure but the utilities need to belong to the people. Water, sewer, gas & electric and internet and TV. I read somewhere about an area, around St Louis, I think, that had provide free internet and either Sprint or Verizon sued to end it and they won. Fuck, fuck the courts, Why should some court be the arbiter of what we the people decide we ant for ourselves! Seriously, fuck the courts. The towns and cities should just say we don't recognize their jurisdiction over this and now, try to come and shut down our internet and see what happens! Ugh, this pisses me off.

I also read an interview with Lynn Rothschild, wife of Evelyn Rothschild, London bankster. She was talking about making her first 40 million and how she made a killing on selling wireless licenses for Puerto Rico. Asked what she paid for the, she said they were give to her for free. Then she sold them and made a fortune. Tell me, how does that work? Who had the right to give her that and how did she get the right to sell it?

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. I just fought with my cable company yesterday.
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:54 AM
Sep 2014

They raised my monthly payments for tv, phone, internet from $175/month to $205/month. I'm looking around now. Unacceptable.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
28. You are in ....Manhattan?
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:41 PM
Sep 2014

They must think everyone is a banker there.
That is an incredibly high price.

What would they charge for just internet?

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
37. Are you with Comcast?
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 04:12 PM
Sep 2014

If so call and ask for the "customer loyalty" dept... Comcast has a habit of raising the bill constantly, in hopes you won't notice. Last time this happened I called and they told me there was nothing they could do for me. So I said fine, disconnect me. Well, 5 minutes later I was speaking to a very friendly person who managed to get me more services for $50 less a month and locked in the price for 3 years.

Just bitch up a storm, it really does help..

RKP5637

(67,102 posts)
8. In USA, Inc., you are just a lowly disgruntled employee with no right to grievance
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:54 AM
Sep 2014

against the company stores.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
10. It cost me 50 bucks a month plus the 20 the land line cost me for a total of 70 bucks
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 10:01 AM
Sep 2014

at&t entered into an agreement with the government that they'd provide us with affordable internet service because of a lawsuit (sorry can't remember the particulars of that lawsuit). I know people who live 10 miles from me who reside in a different town who pay 20 dollars a month for the same speed I get for that 70 dollar outlay, nor a land line requirement btw. Some how the town I live in won't allow AT&T to provide us internet service here. I've asked and am always told the same thing that they do not provide internet service here in chouteau oklahoma and thats that.
The purported speed I pay for is 7 mbps but when tested with speedtest.net it always checked out to be slightly above or below 5. If I'm up early on a saturday morning I might see something a little closer to that 7 I pay for otherwise i get what I get and, again, thats that. I'm reminded that nothing says they have to actually provide me with the speed I pay for that its only a figure they strive to give me.
I can get hughes net for a shitpot more money or cable which is not as reliable plus when a lot of people are on it at the same time is slower than smoke off you know what.

I feel cheated and violated but it seem I have no recourse.

who do I complain too

indie9197

(509 posts)
52. Mine is supposed to be $35 phone + $35 internet = $70, but plus taxes = $85
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:22 PM
Sep 2014

And I am paying for "high speed up to 5 Mbps" which is true, I get 3-4 Mbps usually. Not good enough to watch Netflix without freezing. CenturyLink at its finest. I have cut the tv, am ready to cut the internet. I will have to make due with free wireless and my smartphone, but I hate being a sucker.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
47. Hahahahaha!
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 06:26 PM
Sep 2014

With the coming Comcast merger and the end of net neutrality these will look like the good old days.

madville

(7,408 posts)
12. I have 3MB DSL because that's all that's available out here
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 10:10 AM
Sep 2014

It's $44 a month after taxes are added, I'm thinking of dropping it though, rarely game online or watch Netflix these days.

phylny

(8,378 posts)
16. We live in the sticks. Satellite, cell or dial-up (haha!) are our only options.
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 11:36 AM
Sep 2014

We're currently trying to see if we can get secondary coverage from Verizon Home Fusion, but it's expensive, too. This country needs to do what was done with Rural Electrification Act and get services into rural and urban areas alike.

I'm not holding my breath.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
25. That would be the solution
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:32 PM
Sep 2014

It has always amazed me that 95% of Brits can get high speed internet service if they desire. Where's that Merican exceptionalism I keep hearing about?

dickthegrouch

(3,172 posts)
18. What my monthly bill looks like :(
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 11:44 AM
Sep 2014

XFINITY Bundled Services

Premier Bundle 1 Outlet
$153.99
08/25 - 09/24

Triple Play Rewards
($20.00)

Total XFINITY Bundled Services $133.99

Additional XFINITY TV Services

Service Protection Plan
$3.99
08/25 - 09/24

Sports Entertainment Pkg
$9.99
08/25 - 09/24

HD/DVR Service (Includes
$17.95
08/25 - 09/24

TFC/Filipino
$12.99
08/25 - 09/24

Filipino VOD
$5.99
08/25 - 09/24

Here TV Monthly
$7.99
08/25 - 09/24

Streampix
$4.99
08/25 - 09/24

Movie HD
$7.99
08/01

Movie HD
$5.99
08/08

Movie HD
$5.99
08/09

Total Additional XFINITY TV Services $83.86

XFINITY Internet

D3 Modem Rental
$8.00
08/25 - 09/24

High Speed Internet
$55.95
08/25 - 09/24

Blast! Internet Svc
$11.00
08/25 - 09/24

Total XFINITY Internet $74.95

XFINITY Voice

Comcast Unlimited Pkg
$39.95
08/25 - 09/24

TN Package
$0.00
08/25 - 09/24

Caller ID TV
$0.00
08/25 - 09/24

International Calls
$2.48

Total XFINITY Voice $42.43



I have no idea how they added the sports package, no-one in this house is the slightest bit interested. Or streampix, the last time I know I ordered a streampix show was a very long time ago and I didn't realize I was signing up for monthly. I thought I had to re-order streampix every month if I wanted it. Any guesses how long that phone call will last?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. Have you checked the indie ISPs? There are a lot of them on the east coast
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:19 PM
Sep 2014

(I'm assuming from your avatar you're in Jersey)

1monster

(11,012 posts)
27. I recently let a glib salesperson talk me out of my AT&T DSL and land line phone to
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:40 PM
Sep 2014

change to AT&T Uverse. It would save me about $70 per month.

Big Mistake. I had better download times with dial up and the phone service is static filled with delayed connections.

The cable television is better than Comcast, but I don't watch television... sigh. My husband does, though. We get somethign between 300 and 400 channels and he watches about four or five of them. sigh.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
31. Don't worry, Obama's got this - Tom Wheeler is FCC Chairman he is very, very, very
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 12:44 PM
Sep 2014

sympathetic with consumers... his qualifications?

Wheeler is a Wall Street banker and former head of the National Cable Television Association (NCTA) and Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA).

I guess he beat out Monsanto, GE and Goldman Sachs.

Enjoy it now, they are planning to cut costs by offering nothing but Bollywood channels to go along with their customer support.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
32. Our internet is $47 for 26MB/4MB, 250MB usage cap
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 01:12 PM
Sep 2014

from the local cable co. We have tv antennas, no tv cable. We have Ooma telephone for $4/month after buying the box for $100. We were paying $160 for tv, internet and phone. It was unaffordable for us. We have a Roku box too, was $100 with no monthly charge. Cutting the cord was the best thing for us.

If it were just me, I wouldn't even have tvs. But my husband doesn't use computers, and he can't live without tv.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
41. We stream Roku, but only use about 100MB per month...
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 04:42 PM
Sep 2014

I'm continually on line too and still only use 100MB.

TransitJohn

(6,932 posts)
42. I use over 250Mb / month just on my phone using Outlook, only
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 05:00 PM
Sep 2014

My job is email intensive, but that's a really low cap.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
45. I don't have a smart phone...
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 05:50 PM
Sep 2014

They do have bigger caps, but it's $105/month. We don't need it. My husband is happy with the 17 channels we get with antennas, and I'm the only one that uses a computer.

My BIL has Netflix and uses up every bit of his 250MB, each 10MB used beyond that is $5. He's a movie watcher, we don't normally watch movies.

TransitJohn

(6,932 posts)
46. That's not really germane to the point I was making, though
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 05:58 PM
Sep 2014

I'm talking about the ridiculously low 250Mb/month cap. One HD movie from Netflix is 4.2 Gb, add another 400 Mb if you want surround sound. 250 Mb is insufficient for video entertainment.

Plus 250 MB is the typical smart phone cap, which is not bigger.

marle35

(172 posts)
50. Sounds a lot like me
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:03 PM
Sep 2014

Just cut cable TV and phone. Old bill was $185 and now it is about $45 for 27MB/5MB internet (not sure if there is a cap). I also purchased an Ooma for $100 after the rebate and paying just $3.70 in fees and taxes for phone service.

Don't have a Roku or other streaming device though. I actually use my HD TV as my computer monitor and will watch a few downloaded shows here and there. I'm not much into watching TV anymore. I miss MSNBC but can live with downloading their lower-res shows a day later. VERY happy with my bill now.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
34. Infrastructure fight
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 02:08 PM
Sep 2014

I don't have any sort of deep understanding of this problem, but here are two elements I see:

1) Telephone companies had too much of an advantage with land line infrastructure from the start, and AT&T was able to establish a monopoly because the FCC decided wireless and cable were its competitors.

2) Start-up DSL companies didn't last very long because they had to sub-contract the physical lines from their rival - the telephone companies, mainly AT&T. And AT&T found sneaky ways to undercut them until they went out of business, and then hiked their prices. AT&T always claims they are charging the "real" cost of something (the cost of their bloated bureaucracy) or they are passing along imposed government fees.

3) For some reason the "competitor" wireless plans continued to stay high priced, using what AT&T charges as a floor instead of passing on to the consumer what it really costs to send a signal through the air. Just like cable TV prices or airline prices "stay in line with each other". d'oh!

Frankly, I think it's idiotic that municipalities don't just set up their own communications infrastructures and tell these big leech corporations to go to hell. Oh yeah - "employment". *checks whether I or the people around me are employed*.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
48. you raise an excellent and important point
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 08:10 PM
Sep 2014

We CAN build out our own infrastructure. The problem is the millionaires who occupy Congress will outlaw us from pulling ourselves by our own bootstraps.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
56. I thought San Francisco was about to do something like this
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 01:22 AM
Sep 2014

But I guess someone got bribed on the way to the forum, lol.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
53. I think it's idiotic that municipalities don't just set up their own communications infrastructure
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 10:41 PM
Sep 2014

I was getting my car serviced in the town next to ours and got bored so I pulled out my old Droid phone to play some solitaire and discovered a Wi-Fi connrction, so I looked at the network option and it said it was a city provided free municipal network.

It was pretty fast too.

If I lived there I'm not sure I would spend on Comcast's internet.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
57. I saw in another thread
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 01:26 AM
Sep 2014

that Wilson, NC was one place experimenting with municipal Internet.

I have relatives there, and I remember that as a small city, just another pit stop on the Bible Belt.

Freaks me out to think of that place as a Leader in Technology Innovation now! Especially since it's apparently one step ahead of San Francisco! Wowzers! :O

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
40. same reason our healthcare is so expensive. It's been sold to psychopaths
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 04:21 PM
Sep 2014

by "our" government. Education is next BTW

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»why is internet so goddam...