General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow America Made ISIS Their Videos and Ours, Their “Caliphate” and Ours -By Tom Engelhardt
How America Made ISIS
Their Videos and Ours, Their Caliphate and Ours
By Tom Engelhardt
What Americans have needed is a little pick-me-up to make us feel better, to make us, in fact, feel distinctly good. Certainly, what official Washington has needed in tough times is a bona fide enemy so darn evil, so brutal, so barbaric, so inhuman that, by contrast, we might know just how exceptional, how truly necessary to this planet we really are.
In the nick of time, riding to the rescue comes something new under the sun: the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), recently renamed Islamic State (IS). Its a group so extreme that even al-Qaeda rejected it, so brutal that its brought back crucifixion, beheading, waterboarding, and amputation, so fanatical that its ready to persecute any religious group within range of its weapons, so grimly beyond morality that its made the beheading of an innocent American a global propaganda phenomenon. If youve got a label thats really, really bad like genocide or ethnic cleansing, you can probably apply it to ISIS's actions.
It has also proven so effective that its relatively modest band of warrior jihadis has routed the Syrian and Iraqi armies, as well as the Kurdish pesh merga militia, taking control of a territory larger than Great Britain in the heart of the Middle East. Today, it rules over at least four million people, controls its own functioning oil fields and refineries (and so their revenues as well as infusions of money from looted banks, kidnapping ransoms, and Gulf state patrons). Despite opposition, it still seems to be expanding and claims it has established a caliphate.
................
Talk about a feel-good feel-bad situation for the leadership of a superpower thats seen better days! Such threatening evil calls for only one thing, of course: for the United States to step in. It calls for the Obama administration to dispatch the bombers and drones in a slowly expanding air war in Iraq and, sooner or later, possibly Syria. It falls on Washingtons shoulders to organize a new coalition of the willing from among various backers and opponents of the Assad regime in Syria, from among those who have armed and funded the extremist rebels in that country, from the ethnic/religious factions in the former Iraq, and from various NATO countries. It calls for Washington to transform Iraqs leadership (a process no longer termed regime change) and elevate a new man capable of reuniting the Shiites, the Sunnis, and the Kurds, now at each others throats, into one nation capable of turning back the extremist tide. If not American boots on the ground, it calls for proxy ones of various sorts that the U.S. military will naturally have a hand in training, arming, funding, and advising. Facing such evil, what other options could there be?
If all of this sounds strangely familiar, it should. Minus a couple of invasions, the steps being considered or already in effect to deal with the threat of ISIS are a reasonable summary of the last 13 years of what was once called the Global War on Terror and now has no name at all. New as ISIS may be, a little history is in order, since that group is, at least in part, Americas legacy in the Middle East.
MUCH MORE:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175888/