Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blueinindiana

(606 posts)
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:14 AM Sep 2014

The head of the CDC is finally getting a grip on the Ebola crisis.


http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/02/health/ebola-outbreak/index.html?iref=allsearch

I have been following the current ebola Zaire strain outbreak since initial reports started surfacing about it. I read in horror as nations especially the large industrialized nations pretty much blow it off or ignore it completely.

Finally when it came into the mainstream spotlight I was taken back by the lack of seriousness by at that time by the WHO and the CDC.

Those on the ground have been calling it out of control for months.

The WHO finally woke up to the disaster and now the CDC.

The director of the CDC in particular I find rather smug and dismisses until the last few days.

Some of the comments he has made such as and when ebola outbreak hits the U.S. It won't be so bad essentially he said only a few people would die until we found out what it was and contained it.

The CDCs leadership on this is sure is lacking so far, I hope this changes.

I fear however this current outbreak is impossible to regain control on. It's spread too far too fast and is more virulent than it's being portrayed.

This tragedy might have been slowed or prevent when it was isolated to a few places, sadly the world as whole dropped a deadly ball that will,have global consequences.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The head of the CDC is finally getting a grip on the Ebola crisis. (Original Post) blueinindiana Sep 2014 OP
That's because there has been one confirmed case here Warpy Sep 2014 #1
The CDC director said earlier.. blueinindiana Sep 2014 #3
Yes, it will be like you say it will Warpy Sep 2014 #9
there was a confirmed case here? magical thyme Sep 2014 #4
no one says it cant happen here. they say the devastation will not be the same. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2014 #6
Page not found - did you mean this? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #2
I understand why the CDC might want to ere on the side of calm . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #5
"stoking fears and panic" - We've got Faux Nooze for that and it is unavoidable corkhead Sep 2014 #8
Culturally and First world practices would keep the spread minimal here. FLPanhandle Sep 2014 #7

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
1. That's because there has been one confirmed case here
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:19 AM
Sep 2014

outside of the two missionaries treated in Atlanta.

It is coming, you know, but not carried by black folks eating monkey meat, it will be brought mostly by returning missionaries and businessmen.

"It can't happen here" is the deadliest illusion people have.

blueinindiana

(606 posts)
3. The CDC director said earlier..
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 11:47 AM
Sep 2014

If and when it comes here it won't be very bad.

Well the family and friends of person infected who will also get infected and the doctors and nurses who treat them before they realize it's ebola and their families that will get infected my disagree.



Warpy

(111,222 posts)
9. Yes, it will be like you say it will
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:45 PM
Sep 2014

In addition, family members will always think they can outrun it, taking it with them. It was the same during every pandemic in our history. Let's hope the next pandemic isn't Ebola-Zaire. It is too efficient a killer.

At least the first world has the means to maintain quarantine. People have water in their houses here, unlike in the developing world where thy must go out at least daily for their water. We have refrigeration so we don't have to go to the market daily for our food.

However, while it's possible to maintain quarantine here, it is not always probable as people are unnerved and prone to cabin fever while they wait to see if they're the next to die.

Hospitals are short staffed now. The system will melt down quickly if there is a large scale outbreak anywhere.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
5. I understand why the CDC might want to ere on the side of calm . . .
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:14 PM
Sep 2014

So as to avoid stoking fears and panic, but I do hope they are taking this more seriously than some of their statements might suggest.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
8. "stoking fears and panic" - We've got Faux Nooze for that and it is unavoidable
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:29 PM
Sep 2014

The gas station I go to has telescreens on their pumps. I have to hear their blathering when I am filling up my car

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
7. Culturally and First world practices would keep the spread minimal here.
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 12:21 PM
Sep 2014

Ebola, as bad as it is, it's not that contagious. Now if it ever evolved to be spread by airborne sneezing instead of direct contact with infected bodily fluids, then watch out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The head of the CDC is fi...