General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumspolly7
(20,582 posts)Response to Nye Bevan (Original post)
Post removed
lunasun
(21,646 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)ozone_man
(4,825 posts)are silent.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)and we certainly deserve to be put in our place by our betters (such as yourself), but might one consider that the issue is not just about potential health effects?
Maybe there is some concern regarding the domination of the world seed market by companies like Monsanto, which genetically engineer their seeds to grow plants that will not produce viable seeds themselves? And maybe this might force farmers to buy new seed each year rather than simply save a portion of their harvest for next year's seeding?
Nah, couldn't be those things. Only idiots would be concerned about something like that.
Javaman
(62,528 posts)it seems as if you and the op are on the same page.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Javaman
(62,528 posts)I have some tea leaves that are really angry with me, can you give them a talking too?
does the poster have a history of this kind of behavior?
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)is not ideal. There are plenty of reasons to be concerned about Monsanto's business practices without believing that Monsanto is deliberately poisoning people or creating monsters.
But there are also people who do believe that GMOs are some sort of scary devil crop and that humanity should stop experimenting with them.
Bryant
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Somehow, people thought that dosing food with x-rays would result in radioactive food (it' doesn't - you'd need a neutron beam for that).
However, the concern over GMOs is not simply that of potential health risk.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)mathematic
(1,439 posts)Genetically engineering each and every regular seed they can get their hands on?
Why do you think there's some sort of overriding desire of farmers to save seeds? Tailors don't raise their own sheep. Brewers don't grow their own hops. Being able to economically grow seeds is not the same thing as being able to economically grow food. Farmers started buying seeds long before gmos and they won't stop buying seeds if gmos suddenly didn't exist.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/pages/why-does-monsanto-sue-farmers-who-save-seeds.aspx
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I remember it from an NPR broadcast. Why do I think there's some sort of overriding desire of farmers to save seeds? Because in the third world (and I'm sure elsewhere as well) farmers can't afford to pay for new seed every year. Saving seed from the harvest is a practice as old as agriculture itself.
There is also the issue of tailoring the genetics of the plant to thrive only with certain patented pesticides and herbicides, which further gouges the farmer.
It's all about corporate control of the food supply, which is bad. I suppose Republicans think it is a good thing, but this isn't a Republican board.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Next.
polly7
(20,582 posts)ReverendDeuce
(1,643 posts)n/t
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)When the honeybees, our most important food pollinators, started dropping like proverbial flies, scientists scrambled to identify their killer (or killers). Attention eventually turned to the increased use of a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids. Scientists now believe at least some of these pesticides play a major role in Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), the ongoing demise of honeybee colonies.
Who makes the neonicotinoids? Syngenta, Bayer CropSciences and Dow Agrosciences.
Who's using them, and for what purpose? Companies like Monsanto, Bayer, Dow Agrosciences . . . in the herbicides and pesticides and seeds they sell to farmers who grow genetically engineered crops. Crops that eventually end up in our food, or in the feed used to fatten up animals in factory farms-animals we slaughter for food.
We need bees in order to grow food, or at least some of it. Yet the food-GMO food, drenched in neonics-we are growing is killing the bees.
------------
It's not just the bees that are dying. Butterfly and bird populations are in decline, too. And it's not just the neonicotinoids that are to blame. Other herbicides and pesticides, especially Monsanto's Roundup, used to grow GMO crops-and also used to contain (kill) weeds in cities and home gardens-are decimating pollinators, fish and wildlife, and some would argue, humans, too.
But we need to look at the bigger picture, too. That means calling for an end to the use of Monsanto's Roundup in urban areas, on our lawns, roadways, schoolyards and parks. It means paying close attention to the seeds and garden plants we buy for our home gardens.
It means asking ourselves what can we do to pressure Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta, and Dupont's customers, both rural and urban, into understanding that their widespread, reckless use of neonics and other toxins is destroying our food, soil, water, air and wildlife? And that organic, sustainable, non-chemical alternatives exist?
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_29307.cfm
hunter
(38,311 posts)How's this thread turning out for you, Nye Beven?