General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVerizon to pay $7.4M to settle FCC investigation into customer information being used for marketing
The FCC said the payment will be the largest such in the agencys history for settling an investigation related to the privacy of telephone customers personal information.
BY Michael Sorrentino - September 3, 2014
...According to the FCC, the agency alleges the company was using the information without first providing customers with a required notice or obtaining their consent for several years.
"Beginning as early as 2006, Verizon failed to generate the required opt-out notices to approximately two million of the company's customers," says an adopting order from the agency released Wednesday. "These failures deprived those customers of information about Verizon's marketing practices and its customers' right to deny Verizon permission to access or use their personal data to market new Verizon services to those customers."
The FCC said the payment, which is going to the U.S. Treasury, will be the largest such payment in the agencys history for settling an investigation related to the privacy of telephone customers personal information.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/verizon-pay-7-4m-settle-fcc-privacy-investigation-article-1.1926966
Seems a straightforward case of not respecting their customers. Don't know how the figure of $7.4M was decided upon.
Big thing is they have to stop doing this. Because of mean old regulators.
Newsjock
(11,733 posts)It might bankrupt the entire corporation!
Cost of doing business, etc.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)They will not be doing 'business as usual' so the 'cost of doing business' line does not apply here.
The result of lawsuits is more to change practices than punish. This may also open the door for a class action lawsuit that will cost Verizon more. That's where the real punishment comes in.
I get the feeling from so many online comments, that nothing less than bankrupting companies is satisfactory. We've got the Romneys of the world doing that already.
This was just a fine, not an attempt to hurt them so badly they'd lay off any portiong of their 183,000 employees:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/257304/number-of-employees-at-verizon/
Protecting the privacy of their customers who number over 100M is the desired goal here.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/01/21/verizon-wireless-adds-17m-subscribers-in-q4-70-now-have-smartphones
The customers, workers and the company are all interconnected. The wrecking ball approach could hurt both those employees and those who count on wireless service. That is not the role of the FCC.
MADem
(135,425 posts)if more of these cases reach the public eye, the corporate reputation will suffer. And the fines may increase.
The bad publicity won't help them, either. People who have a choice between Verizon and "Something Else" will choose "Something Else."
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)and not a penny for people who were screwed by Verizon like me, who was a customer of that wretched company back in 2006. Not even the nickels and dimes that the class action lawsuit attorneys get for the wronged while they collect their millions. And this settlement is ultimately going to be paid for by current Verizon ratepayers, of which I am never ever going to be one again.
Justice, indeed.
ripcord
(5,321 posts)The government wasn't wronged the customers were.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)with a 100M others. For sure, the recompense would be small. I don't expect anything good from these providers and never went with AT&T or Verizon or whoever. Can't afford any fancy service or even texting, just plain old phone for $37 a month on the same plan I've had for years with T-Mo. No computer access or any of that stuff.
Exactly how did Verizon injure you, if you don't mind saying so? Did they give your personal data to some criminal? Did they over charge you on your contract?
Did you suffer from bad connections or missed calls? Did they damage your credit and ability to rent a place to live or buy a vehicle or home? Did you lose a job or relationship because of it or you or someone you care about suffer serious injury due to a missed call like an emergency call? Did the cost run you away?
I don't understand the heat on this subject as I am confronted with things most of us are that I regard as much more harmful than cellphone providers. Like people being denied care, food, shelter or other rights. I can't get upset about the cellphone but I am not in the same position as others, no doubt. Each person has triggers.
I posted this merely to inform DU that Verizon will not be able to market their data to corporations anymore. To me, that's good news, if only to protect that 100M people.
Justice is a much bigger concern, and this is not about people being shot by police, etc.
Just sayin'
MADem
(135,425 posts)swiping and reselling their private details anymore, and manage to make it BAD NEWS that they didn't get a check for three dollars out of the bargain--after the lawyers got their bite of the apple.
Eh...!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)The trolls are winning, maybe...?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Not calling out any of the posters in this thread as I don't know them from Adam or Eve, as the case may be. Just figure anything causing bitterness after 8 years has to be a doozy. I've definitely been effed but good so many times I can't hold onto it all.
Besides:
'It's just a plant!' said the hero, just before it nearly destroyed the secret installation in Cheyenne Mountain. Yes, that place!
Which allegedly operated America's most valued intergalactic means of travel. That is to say, a wormhole built by ancient aliens as a stargate.
And the coolest thing that never happened, so we're supposed to think...
Always loved that pic.
Cha
(297,068 posts)didn't seem to get in the comment section. It's all Wah wah wah.. not even knowing what the OP was about.
Thank you, freshwest!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Thought they'd have followed the regs earlier. Now they will...
Cha
(297,068 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)That is to say, about one in three Americans. I thought the numbers were significant, not the fine. It's just a reminder, that 'business as usual' does not trump privacy rights for Americans. Just like the call for demilitarization of cities since Ferguson. It will take some time, and the only ones really heartbroken will be the wailers at Infowars.
Just sayin'
Cha
(297,068 posts)sheshe2
(83,712 posts)Wow!
I have no choice, I have Verizon because my apartment was already wired with it.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/verizon-pay-7-4m-settle-fcc-privacy-investigation-article-1.1926966#ixzz3CNSanBmo
I am going to have to check out my next bill for the opt-out! Thanks for the heads up!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I'd still rather have the Scandinavian model. But alas, Americans are not ready to embrace that.
Corporations are suing the FCC for not allowing them to kick out public broadband to keep their current monopolies, which don't even serve the areas the cities do!
We've got to stop this kind of thinking. It may not be in a my lifetime.
sheshe2
(83,712 posts)I am not really unhappy with them, other than using my personal information. I have always had quick responses from them. The last time my cable wire detached from the house they were here on a Saturday within a half hour.
Agreed though, that won't happen in my lifetime either. The Corporations are all about them and never about us.
As an aside, I got to Market Basket today. I was out of everything. They were stocking the shelves like crazy, however they have a way to go.