Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 03:28 PM Sep 2014

Appeals court rules same-sex marriage ban in Wisconsin unconstitutional

CHICAGO —A U.S. appeals court in Chicago has ruled that gay marriage bans in Wisconsin and Indiana are unconstitutional.

Thursday's decision by a three-judge panel at the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals bumps the number of states where gay marriage will be legal from 19 to 21. The decision was unanimous.

The Wisconsin and Indiana cases shifted to Chicago after their attorneys general appealed separate lower court rulings in June tossing the bans. The 7th Circuit stayed those rulings pending its own decision.

During oral arguments in August, one judge appointed by a Republican likened same-sex marriage bans to laws once barring interracial marriage. Judge Richard Posner said they derived from "hate ... and savage discrimination" of gays.

The states argued the prohibitions helped foster a centuries-old tradition.


Read more: http://www.wisn.com/politics/appeals-court-rules-samesex-marriage-ban-in-wisconsin-unconstitutional/27882336#ixzz3CNQb6KjQ



7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court rules same-sex marriage ban in Wisconsin unconstitutional (Original Post) PeaceNikki Sep 2014 OP
Excellent news! Almost halfway there. MineralMan Sep 2014 #1
And a unanimous opinion at that. hifiguy Sep 2014 #2
Posner did write it. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #3
Ouch. That is gonna leave a mark. One that will last for a while. hifiguy Sep 2014 #4
Yes! I'm going to party like it's 2014! William769 Sep 2014 #5
Eight days after argument. Incredible. Posner is an incredibly fast writer. n/t Unvanguard Sep 2014 #6
He had half the opinion in written in his head hifiguy Sep 2014 #7
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
2. And a unanimous opinion at that.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 04:59 PM
Sep 2014

If Judge Posner wrote the opinion - it doesn't mention who the author was in the article - it is sure to be airtight.

The CofA turned that case awfully quickly.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
3. Posner did write it.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:20 PM
Sep 2014
The unanimous decision by the three-judge panel of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago criticized the justifications both states gave for the bans, several times singling out the argument that marriage between a man and a woman is tradition. There are, the court noted, good and bad traditions.

"Bad traditions that are historical realities such as cannibalism, foot-binding, and suttee, and traditions that from a public-policy standpoint are neither good nor bad — such as trick-or-treating on Halloween," it said. "Tradition per se therefore cannot be a lawful ground for discrimination-regardless of the age of the tradition."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/court-rules-gay-marriage-bans-states-25250547
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
4. Ouch. That is gonna leave a mark. One that will last for a while.
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:33 PM
Sep 2014

And it will also leave a few SCOTUS justices reaching for the Pepto while Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer, JJ smile quietly to themselves.

Speaking from experience, judges and their law clerks really enjoy writing opinions where they can flash their literary chops and real thoughts.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
7. He had half the opinion in written in his head
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 07:41 PM
Sep 2014

by the time he was done mercilessly running those two idiots through the shredder of logic. There was nothing left of those klowns by the end of oral argument save for two pairs of smoking shoes. Probably dictated most of it and had his clerks fill in the cites and references, then put the eyebrows on it in editing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals court rules same-...