General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Stubborn "Nail Houses" That Refuse to Get Demolished
In 1914, the government of New York City took ownership of a Manhattan apartment building belonging to one David Hess. The city used a legal power called eminent domain, allowing governments to seize private property for public usein this case they wanted to expand the subway system. Hess fought them and lost, and when all was said and done, his building was torn down, and he was left with a triangle shaped piece of property. It was about the size of a large slice of pizza.
Later, the city tried to get him to donate his pizza-shaped property so that they could build a sidewalk. He refused again. They built the sidewalk anyway, and in the middle of the sidewalk is Hess's triangle, with a tile mosaic that reads: "Property of the Hess Estate Which Has Never Been Dedicated For Public Purposes."
People such as David Hess, who refuse to sell their properties, are called holdouts. Eminent domain generally only comes into play when the government wants private property for public use (though there have been some exceptions). If it's a private development that wants your place and you refuse to sell, there's often not much they can do. In China, where there's been development boom in recent years, they call their holdout houses "nail houses."
Now the story starts getting really interesting. You will enjoy this I'm sure
Around 2005, a Seattle neighborhood called Ballard started to see unprecedented growth. Condominiums and apartment buildings were sprouting up all over the community which had once been mostly single family homes and small businesses. Around this time, developers offered a woman named Edith Macefield $750,000 dollars for her small house, which was appraised at around $120,000. They wanted to build a shopping mall on the block where Macefield had lived for the last 50 years.
http://gizmodo.com/the-stubborn-nail-houses-that-refuse-to-get-demolishe-1631053177
A HERETIC I AM
(24,360 posts)Thanks for posting.
Suich
(10,642 posts)Looking forward to reading it!
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)However, I will give him full credit especially after health care workers who knew them vouched for him. If he had really been after the property, he could have really taken advantage of her after he got her power of attorney.
She was a remarkable woman, and her story deserves to be told.
NBachers
(17,080 posts)This story reminds me of "The Little House."
PSPS
(13,579 posts)When Fred Meyer wanted to build their Roseway store at 69th and NE Sandy Boulevard, there was a single holdout on the block (on the 68th St. side) who wouldn't sell and they built their store around their property. That was probably in the 60's.
Since then, Fred Meyer closed the store and it now operates as a Safeway. The house is now gone too.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)A lone holdout was surrounded by the first mall and strip shopping centers in the 60s. Sadly, everything is gone now (including a Walmart!), and the entire area is a blight.
Here's a new kerfuffle, with the Masonic Center purchasing two historic homes, intending to raze them for expansion. As a longtime resident of an historic district, I can understand and appreciate both sides of the fight, and see no winner.