Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 06:30 PM Sep 2014

Patton Oswalt on the leaked photo scandal

Snip...

The actresses (all women, hmmm) who had their personal info hacked from the "cloud" had taken every step they thought needed to be taken to keep their shit safe. "The cloud is secure," we've been told, again and again. Fine. This is America. And they're grown women. With grown-up, consenting partners. Sex is fun, in every imaginable variation. So they had fun with their partners. In any way they saw fit, and in a way that was JUST BETWEEN THEM AND THEIR PARTNER. In the case of Mary Elizabeth Winstead, where she was sharing nude pics with her husband, they thought twice about it and DELETED THE PICS.

And yet, pasty mole-men with Cheeto fingers went creepy-crawling through the 1s and 0s of the info-cloud until they dug up the photos. And then shared them with the world. Which, apparently, is full of men who are resentful of hot women who like to have fun with a partner of their own choosing. Uppity, selfish bitches, amirite? Up top, bro. High five.

Anthony Weiner, bless his heart, was a silly dumbass who, in a momentary brain-blur, shared pics of his dick with someone on Twitter. A consenting, flirty, sexting partner, I assume. EXCEPT HE HIT THE WRONG BUTTON AND SHARED THEM WITH THE WORLD.

The actresses who had their private photos hacked, in some cases AFTER they'd deleted them? Creepy. Disturbing.

A politician who hits the wrong button on an iPhone and sends his cock out into the ether? HILARIOUS.

Trying to compare the two and scream hypocrisy? It's like comparing my disgust with someone taking peephole photos in a woman's private shower to my delight at a cam girl dancing naked who doesn't realize the curtains are open behind her and is giving a free skin-show to two Jehovah's Witnesses and a Girl Scout troop selling cookies.
Do people realize there's already all kinds of naked people on the internet? Gorgeous, energetic men and women who could not be more excited for you to look at them from every single angle? And please don't give me the whole "forbidden fruit tastes better" horseshit. Hacked photos aren't "forbidden fruit." They're fruit you didn't even know existed. And then you act like Indiana Jones escaping a temple with a jeweled idol when they're dropped in your sad lap.
The other aspect of Anthony "Carlos Danger" Weiner's schlong-capades that's missing from the hacked photo story is one of real-world importance. It does NOT affect you, in ANY way shape or form, what consenting adults do with one another. It's their business. And before you say it -- no, it ALSO doesn't affect you if a politician is getting some strange on the side. FDR, JFK, Bush Sr. & Clinton all had mistresses.

But Weiner wanted to join that roll call. And that's a roll call that, since JFK at least, put you within arms reach of the nuclear Armageddon button. And I don't want a guy near that switch when he's already proved he can't be trusted with the "DON'T PUSH THIS OR THE WORLD SEES YOUR DICK" button.


Much more on his FB page: https://www.facebook.com/pattonoswalt/posts/10152464155507655?fref=nf

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Patton Oswalt on the leaked photo scandal (Original Post) PeaceNikki Sep 2014 OP
The cloud is corporate-speak for keeping your stuff on someone elses hard drive. Snarkoleptic Sep 2014 #1
The cloud is the return of the old time-sharing model we used to back in the day. riqster Sep 2014 #2
Anyone that believes the cloud is secure Egnever Sep 2014 #3
Word to everyone--don't get caught with your breaches down. kairos12 Sep 2014 #4
I agree Skittles Sep 2014 #15
"pasty mole-men with Cheeto fingers went creepy-crawling through the 1s and 0s of the info-cloud" progressoid Sep 2014 #5
Patton is an artist. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #13
His bit on the "Christmas Shoes" song is mandatory holiday viewing for my wife and I... SidDithers Sep 2014 #24
First four posts in this thread are blaming the victims Beaverhausen Sep 2014 #6
I do sympathize with the victims but... Perseus Sep 2014 #8
You had me up to "but". n/t eggplant Sep 2014 #11
The photos are stored to the cloud automatically, uploaded from the phone. Starry Messenger Sep 2014 #14
no one ever hacks into phones Skittles Sep 2014 #17
People break into houses and rifle through drawers too. LeftyMom Sep 2014 #21
hey, whatever floats your boat Skittles Sep 2014 #22
here you're not allowed to hate the hackers and still advise common sense Skittles Sep 2014 #16
I don't see any hate for the hackers from the victim-blamers Beaverhausen Sep 2014 #19
oh yea, they are all pro-hacker Skittles Sep 2014 #23
no shit PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #12
I don't know why he has to drag Cheetos down, though. egduj Sep 2014 #7
Ii is just a reference to the old joke Perseus Sep 2014 #9
It's Patton Oswalt... Chan790 Sep 2014 #10
Mr Sky Cake.. sendero Sep 2014 #18
Courageous stance against bad behavior. Dreamer Tatum Sep 2014 #20

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts)
1. The cloud is corporate-speak for keeping your stuff on someone elses hard drive.
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 06:59 PM
Sep 2014

That said, what these hackers did inexcusable and they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
2. The cloud is the return of the old time-sharing model we used to back in the day.
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 07:37 PM
Sep 2014

The only delta is the increased dispersion of hardware.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
3. Anyone that believes the cloud is secure
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 07:42 PM
Sep 2014

Is whistling past the graveyard. There are breaches daily in the news.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
8. I do sympathize with the victims but...
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 08:38 PM
Sep 2014

Why would anyone want to save that kind of personal information in the cloud? Why do people think that the cloud is safe? It is new technology, it is out there for the taking and hackers are very good at that.

The victims must take some blame on this because the old "think before you act" has to come into play here...what proof does anyone have on the security of the cloud? This is private stuff that should kept private, if you save it somewhere where someone else becomes the keeper, then you don't have anyone but yourself to blame.

I am not saying that the people who stole the photos are not to blame, but...

This is another proof on why politicians lie to people, because they know they will believe anything they say, as long as it is presented in the proper way, with the proper commercials, just like IBM wants to make you think that you life/business is going to become so much better once you join the cloud, until one of those servers in the cloud dies and all your business is down for a week while they find it.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
14. The photos are stored to the cloud automatically, uploaded from the phone.
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 08:56 PM
Sep 2014

Most of these photos were not saved to the cloud by conscious decision. Many of the photos were actually deleted from the phones they were taken on, as in, the owner thought they were gone.

Stealing is stealing. It's a crime.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
21. People break into houses and rifle through drawers too.
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 12:19 PM
Sep 2014

So nobody should ever have naked pictures, risque love letters, sex toys, sexy underpants or for that matter unsexy underpants either.

We should all structure our lives around thieves who disrespect our privacy.

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
22. hey, whatever floats your boat
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 03:12 PM
Sep 2014

I remember back in the day laughing at a boyfriend who wanted pictures - and that was WAY before the internet - I remember thinking, yeah, he wouldn't show his friends......................riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
16. here you're not allowed to hate the hackers and still advise common sense
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 09:10 PM
Sep 2014

you get accused of victim blaming

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
19. I don't see any hate for the hackers from the victim-blamers
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 12:06 PM
Sep 2014

Last edited Mon Sep 8, 2014, 12:40 PM - Edit history (1)

I see them calling people naive and stupid for doing ANYTHING that one might want to keep personal.

Do you also blame people who have things stolen from their houses because, well, you know, people can pick locks?

Skittles

(153,160 posts)
23. oh yea, they are all pro-hacker
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 03:14 PM
Sep 2014

JAYSUS

hey, if someone steals my TV and takes a picture and scans it into the internet I will not forever worry who might see it

NAKED PICTURES ARE DIFFERENT - UNDERSTAND???

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
9. Ii is just a reference to the old joke
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 08:46 PM
Sep 2014

of the guy who goes to the doctor because his private part has turned orange, so when the doctor asks what he does during the days, he tells the doctor he eats cheetos and watches porno films...but I agree, he should not drag cheetos down...

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
20. Courageous stance against bad behavior.
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 12:14 PM
Sep 2014

Glad we have his take. Was not sure what to make of it all until now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patton Oswalt on the leak...