Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drip, drip, drip. 475 MORE troops on the ground in Iraq, CREEEEEP into Syria. (Original Post) morningfog Sep 2014 OP
What is that 1,500 now??? grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #1
Except, we just did that a few weeks ago and then pulled them out. So, no. nt stevenleser Sep 2014 #2
So yes Steve. Over 1000 are in Iraq now. morningfog Sep 2014 #3
So no, we pulled those folks out. Do keep up. nt stevenleser Sep 2014 #4
No, they are still there neverforget Sep 2014 #5
No they are not. Read further in your own link. These are not the folks sent a few weeks ago stevenleser Sep 2014 #7
They are in Iraq. They have not left. neverforget Sep 2014 #9
You shouldn't insult someone when you are wrong. morningfog Sep 2014 #10
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #13
I'd like to know where he got the idea that they left? neverforget Sep 2014 #15
I think he was referring to the group sent to assess morningfog Sep 2014 #16
How many Mercenaries are there also? Wait, we don't call them Mercs, Bush called them 'security sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #20
Excellent point. woo me with science Sep 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Sep 2014 #6
Don't forget God bless our military elehhhhna Sep 2014 #8
Add another E Shivering Jemmy Sep 2014 #11
I think that would be excessive. morningfog Sep 2014 #14
Is anyone else getting sick of cleaning up Riyadh's mistakes? N/t roamer65 Sep 2014 #12
I wouldn't call it a mistake. What those sack of shit flaccid sociopaths Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #17
We are in a state perpetual war now n/t Boreal Sep 2014 #18
We've been. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #19
kick. Here we go again. woo me with science Sep 2014 #21

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
5. No, they are still there
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 09:51 PM
Sep 2014
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is sending 475 more U.S. troops into Iraq to supplement an existing American military presence that is helping Iraqi security forces battle Islamic State militants and secure diplomatic facilities.

Obama was announcing the additional forces Wednesday as part of an expanded offensive against the Islamic State group in Iraq and in Syria.

The new troops would join more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel in Iraq and would be embedded with Iraqi security forces and help identify targets for U.S. military airstrikes against the extremist group.

Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/2014/09/10/3531802/obama-to-send-475-additional-troops.html#storylink=cpy
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
7. No they are not. Read further in your own link. These are not the folks sent a few weeks ago
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 09:53 PM
Sep 2014
The new troops would join more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel in Iraq and would be embedded with Iraqi security forces and help identify targets for U.S. military airstrikes against the extremist group.

The U.S. already has more than 750 U.S. military personnel supporting diplomatic security at facilities in Baghdad and nearly 300 at joint operating centers in Baghdad and Irbil (ur-BEEL').


Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/2014/09/10/3531802_obama-to-send-475-additional-troops.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
10. You shouldn't insult someone when you are wrong.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:00 PM
Sep 2014

475 more to the 1000 still there. There was a separate contingent who landed and left from the mountain. Do keep up indeed.

Response to morningfog (Reply #10)

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
16. I think he was referring to the group sent to assess
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:24 PM
Sep 2014

The escape from the mountain. They were only there briefly. But, none of the others have left.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
20. How many Mercenaries are there also? Wait, we don't call them Mercs, Bush called them 'security
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 01:09 PM
Sep 2014

contractors'. We need troops there in order to justify the mercs according to the law. They are supposed to be 'support' for the troops. But I haven't found out how many mercs are allowed to the number of troops.

Will have to do a little research on that.

Response to morningfog (Original post)

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
14. I think that would be excessive.
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:09 PM
Sep 2014

I just want to remind everyone this started with a humanitarian rescue from a mountain.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,500 posts)
17. I wouldn't call it a mistake. What those sack of shit flaccid sociopaths
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:39 PM
Sep 2014

do, seems quite intentional. The get to send out into the world a bunch of deranged jaggoffs who are even crazier than they are so they don't have to deal with them at home.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drip, drip, drip. 475 MOR...