Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,961 posts)
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:59 PM Sep 2014

Charles Blow Speaks for Me: "HERE WE GO AGAIN"

The Cost of War
SEPT. 10, 2014

But I implore the president and the nation to proceed with caution.

We can kill anti-American fighters and even their leaders, but we can’t kill anti-American sentiment. To some degree, every time we commit our forces in the Middle East we run the risk of further inflaming that sentiment.

For every action, there is a reaction. And there are also consequences, some of them unintended.

.................

“Now, U.S. warplanes are flying sorties, at a cost somewhere between $22,000 to $30,000 per hour for the F-16s, to drop bombs that cost at least $20,000 each, to destroy this captured equipment. That means if an F-16 were to take off from Incirlik Air Force Base in Turkey and fly two hours to Erbil, Iraq, and successfully drop both of its bombs on one target each, it costs the United States somewhere between $84,000 to $104,000 for the sortie and destroys a minimum of $1 million and a maximum of $12 million in U.S.-made equipment.”



http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/opinion/charles-blow-the-cost-of-war.html?_r=0
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Blow Speaks for Me: "HERE WE GO AGAIN" (Original Post) kpete Sep 2014 OP
A win-win for the MIC. Barack_America Sep 2014 #1
Actually he is proceeding with caution. still_one Sep 2014 #2
Yes, he is. The drama! nt babylonsister Sep 2014 #5
We gotta lose the midterms somehow! blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #3
You got that right BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #6
+1 Scuba Sep 2014 #9
I am so angry tonight Marrah_G Sep 2014 #4
Charles Blow really doesn't need to "implore" the President to "proceed with caution".. in case Cha Sep 2014 #7
I like Mr. Blow. AtomicKitten Sep 2014 #8

Cha

(296,844 posts)
7. Charles Blow really doesn't need to "implore" the President to "proceed with caution".. in case
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 03:54 AM
Sep 2014

anyone hasn't noticed that's what he's been doing.. that's the Obama way. And, I see no reason that he'll be doing it differently now.

And, it's not "here we go again".. it's bush's fucking mess that came from LIES and is the Cost of a misbegotten War.. and yeah we're still cleaning it up but this is not on President Obama who is being straight with us.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
8. I like Mr. Blow.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 04:00 AM
Sep 2014

And he is so right. I don't have the stomach or heart for more war. We should have left that messy mistake a longass time ago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Blow Speaks for M...