Meet the New War, Same as the Old War
President Barack Obama departs after delivering
a televised address to the nation on his plans for military
action against the Islamic State, from the Cross Hall of
the White House in Washington, Sept. 10, 2014.
(Photo: Saul Loeb / Pool via The New York Times)
Meet the New War, Same as the Old War
By William Rivers Pitt
Truthout | Op-Ed
Thursday 11 September 2014
On the night before the thirteenth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, President Obama delivered a prime-time press conference to discuss the new war in Iraq, which is really the old war, as it never actually ended. It dropped from the headlines here in the US a few years ago, except for an occasional heinous act that got brief ink - a marketplace massacre that killed 150, or a mosque bombing that killed 80 would get some ink and then fade - but people have been dying in Iraq every single day since we stuck our booted toe into their sand eighteen months after the Towers came down.
(snip)
So maybe I'm wrong, and the Wednesday night words of the president will prove prescient, and everything will work out fine...except, by my calculations, every time we drop bombs on a problem that was caused by us dropping bombs, we wind up dropping more bombs to try and solve it, and nothing ever gets fixed, but some people get paid, so the impetus to drop more bombs on the bombs we already dropped increases by order of magnitude, especially when we get the ratings-happy "news" media involved in the show.
There is some controversy over who actually said this, but the line is generally attributed to Albert Einstein. "The definition of insanity," goes the quote, "is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result." Whoever actually said it should be awarded the Nobel Prize, just like the president.
It has been thirteen years since the attacks of September 11, and this nation has spent every one of the 4,745 days between that morning and today in the grips of a media and politics and money-driven high panic. Millions upon millions have been killed, maimed, displaced or bankrupted in the process. ISISISILIS are bad guys, and no mistake, but there are a pile of nations on this planet besides us with standing armies, many of them with a far more vested personal interest in eradicating these lunatics than us. Their militaries are not exhausted like ours is.
"Our endless blessings bestow an enduring burden," said President Obama on Wednesday night, "but as Americans, we welcome our responsibility to lead."
Who is this "we," sir? You got a mouse in your pocket? I can only imagine the comforts that come with living in the White House, but for an enormous swath of the country you lead, the "blessings" you speak of turned to ashes in our mouths a long time ago. The money we are going to spend bombing the problems we caused by bombing the problems we bombed can be better spent creating jobs, repairing infrastructure, and educating our children to know better when a politician comes calling with platitudes about the excellence of the United States before announcing his intention to blow more stuff up.
We were excellent, I suppose. We certainly can be. It has been twenty-four years of this, with the twenty-five years of Vietnam still receding in the rear-view. Imagine if we had those 50 years back, and then imagine what we could do with 50 years unencumbered by profiteering warfare.
Maybe I'm wrong. Enjoy your new war, which is the old war. I'm sure it will all work out just fine.
The rest: http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/26113-william-rivers-pitt-meet-the-new-war-same-as-the-old-war
= new reply since forum marked as read
Both the candidates in your tag line are nobility, ie, scions of political fathers.
That's how it's done in this great democracy. Just like the aristocracy we fled from...England.
Good candidates both, in any case. 
to make peace profitable.
It's a big world out there with plenty of potential consumers.
It's more about control and keeping other countries down and keeping the middle class down.
If you remember the Clinton era, it was relatively peaceful and prosperous.
But the neocons don't want that.
They don't want the middle class to feel comfortable and enjoy freedom.
They might become morally shallow and start to think for themselves.
(These thoughts are somewhat influenced by the documentary "The Power of Nightmares"
.
= $$$... what could possibly go wrong?
All our military adventures since WWII have ended up with clear-cut victories over evil. We've spread democracy, freedom, and justice. Our spotless record of defending human rights throughout the world has earned us the praise of everyone. What could possibly go wrong with a bombing campaign against a few extremists? It can't possibly draw us into a larger war. It can't possibly earn us the enmity of anybody. We can bomb our way to peace, just as we have in the past.
Do I even need to add the 
icon..?
... because we have a hoard of DUers who sound just like that right now. 
the WMD lie was what functioned them.
He tried the kindness approach by establishing the Peace Corps and the Alliance for Progress.
Not your post which is good as usual but odd back drops or subliminals in the photos of this speech.
1. the microphones.......look like tiny darth vader type entities...
2. the back drop, who picked that?
I've only seen pictures and so far
some weird shit. Almost like it gives him a head ornament.
3. I'm weird and I know it. but perpetual war is not my thing.
Or will we? 
K&R
and tweet
and email
and anything else I can do
Thank you, Will, for saying what needs to be said...
