Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A bucketful of yardsticks (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Sep 2014 OP
I pay no attention to any republican's opinion of any black man rock Sep 2014 #1
I don't either. Let's find a better use for that bucket of yardsticks... Tanuki Sep 2014 #3
Easy. Donald Ian Rankin Sep 2014 #2
Too soon. GeorgeGist Sep 2014 #4

rock

(13,218 posts)
1. I pay no attention to any republican's opinion of any black man
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 02:59 PM
Sep 2014

I think that's a perfectly sensible and sane position.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
2. Easy.
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 03:12 PM
Sep 2014

The approved yardstick for measuring president Obama is marked "W Bush, Clinton, HW Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, LBJ, JFK, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Hoover, Coolidge".

I would say Obama comes about three quarters of the way up it, around a bunch of fairly closely-clustered marks.

He's clearly been a better president than W Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Hoover or Coolidge; he clearly hasn't been as good as FDR or Truman; comparing him to Clinton, HW Bush, Carter, LBJ, JFK or Eisenhower - the ones I categorise alongside him as "neither awful nor great*" is perhaps less obvious.


*The exception being LBJ, who has both much stronger negatives and much stronger positives than most of the rest, and I would categorise as both great and awful in different ways.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A bucketful of yardsticks