General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEncourage Bernie Sanders to run for President (link)
https://www.credomobilize.com/petitions/encourage-senator-bernie-sanders-to-run-for-president-in-2016-as-a-democratIt's a petition to encourage the Senator to run for President as a Democrat.
There is also a facebook link.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/US-Senator-Bernie-Sanders-for-President-2016/253576231398947
From Senator Sanders' wiki:
Possible 2016 presidential run
In a March 6, 2014 interview with The Nation, Sanders stated that he is "prepared to run for President of the United States" in 2016[6] but did not officially announce a campaign. When pressed on the issue, Sanders said, "If the question is am I actively right now organizing and raising money and so forth for a campaign for president, I am not doing that. On the other hand, am I talking to people around the country? Yes, I am. Will I be doing some traveling around the country? Yes, I will be. But I think its premature to be talking about a campaign when we still have a 2014 congressional race in front of us."[6]
TheNutcracker started a thread today on Sanders' appearance on Meet the Press this morning.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5534033
On the thread, in addition to a lot of praise for Sen. Sanders, is a clip valerief was kind enough to post.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5534145
Regardless of how you intend to vote in a primary, if you can watch that clip and be indifferent to having Sen. Sanders in the race, even if he loses, this post is not for you.
For everyone else, please show your interest by clicking on both of the links at the beginning of this post and show Senator Sanders and everyone else that we do not appreciate oligarchy.
Faux pas
(14,667 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)His ideas belong in the race.
Faux pas
(14,667 posts)Anybody but hillary ideal. But, beyond that, Bernie is my Hero.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Faux pas
(14,667 posts)we the people. It's hard to argue with that!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Among many other things, I saw how he served Toad.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)SamKnause
(13,091 posts)Signature #14,060.
merrily
(45,251 posts)jehop61
(1,735 posts)If regular democratic votes are split, one of the idiot republucans will likely win. We saw it happen in 2000, and it will happen again. Another tactic might to put lots of effort into turning The Congress into a more progressive body that will do more of the things we want done. How about Bernie for Vice President? If Bernie had more mainstream support, I'd say go for it, but realistically, he couldn't win in the south or west. I like what he says, but we need a candidate who can generate broad support. Maybe someday......
merrily
(45,251 posts)Or that you don't want to see this thread?
I don't understand your post.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Remember, we're "Underground", and that's where Bernie's support comes from. You're exactly right, he is not NOW, nor will he ever be a mainstream candidate. Remember this idiot? His chief goal was to make sure that Democrats lost.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Bernie couldn't beat Obama in his own backyard in a hypothetical matchup. He won't be allowed to switch his affiliation, just to get access to our infrastructure and mailing lists. And if he thinks that's gonna happen, he'll be quickly disabused of such notions. When the folks he needs to win are reminded that he suggested Obama should face a primary in 2012, he'll be toast.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He said this morning that he might and has not made up his mind yet.
And what does beating Obama have to do with 2016?
Jaysus.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Kilgore
(1,733 posts)Watch a video of her and Bernie side by side.
Her passion is manufactured and rehearsed. Bernie comes across with passion and power that flows from deep inside.
Will be painfully obvious in a debate and folks will notice.
Kilgore
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)That also is "painfully obvious".
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)That's an impressive skill.
When asked whether he would run as a Democrat or an Independent, Bernie was carefully non-committal. However, he cited the difficulty of getting on the ballot in all 50 states as an Independent. Based on that statement (and this formidable obstacle), I'm guessing that Bernie will run as a Democrat.
Someone here appears to be sowing the seeds of disunity. And I don't think it's Ralph.
merrily
(45,251 posts)You need a headquarters and an organization in every state, volunteers in every state to GOTV. And he did say all 50 states, so he seems in line with Dean on the 50 state strategy.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Thanks for adding it.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)As much as people claim to be anti-war, anti-interventionist, you see what happens when Americans are murdered. The appetitite for bloodlust increases. Bernie's isolationist leanings won't play well after Obama. The country will elect someone who's much more hawkish and sure-footed when it comes to foreign intervention. Bank on it.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)then what's it to you if he runs and if we as unimportant piddly little posters here vote for him?
merrily
(45,251 posts)From the jump, the PTB of the Party have seemed desperate that she not be challenged in a primary. Maybe they don't really think she is as "inevitable" as they've been saying publicly for the past two years.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That's some real honest thinking you have there
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)if there are any, that is.
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)Senator Bernie Sanders has many great clips available on YouTube.
It is very rare that I get to use the word HONORABLE to describe a U.S. politician !!!!!!!!!!!!
merrily
(45,251 posts)tons of air time.
merrily
(45,251 posts)rich members of Congress, both houses.
Sounds honorable to me.
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)He is a rare and honorable politician indeed.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)so we didn't have to trudge through the other MTP slop.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I enjoyed that clip so much.
Win, lose or draw, America needs to hear what he is saying.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Yay, Bernie!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)CarrieLynne
(497 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)I do not want to lose him as a Senator.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Will they let him run as a Dem while holding a Senate seat as an Indie? Maybe. He's in their caucus.
Apart from that he is not up for re-election in 2016, so that is not a problem. (He ran in 2012 against five or six others and got 71% of the vote, LOL!)
But no law would requires him to quit the seat in order to run for Pres.
Didn't Biden run for the Senate and VP at the same time? Or am I misremembering?
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)What you've actually done is given your contact information to a liberal advocacy group. Maybe you want to support them, but are you really under the illusion that this will have any influence on Sanders' decision?
If you want Bernie to run, you're going to have to get organized (like "Ready for Hillary" or at a minimum close your web browser and writer real letters with real personal opinions as to why he should run.
merrily
(45,251 posts)We've all signed enough of them to get it.
are you really under the illusion that this will have any influence on Sanders' decision?
Thanks for being so condescending. I have very few illusions left. As long as the petition doesn't discourage him, I'm fine with signing the petition.
And I am really enjoying the enthusiasm.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)posting anonymously on an internet discussion board
merrily
(45,251 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)As you can see from the quote from Sanders in the OP, he is focused on the midterms.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)nuff said
merrily
(45,251 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)changing to a Dem if he were to run?
This isn't where I read it but here it is..
Sanders may run for White House as a Dem, but 'the issue is not Hillary'
Sanders said, however, the two could be in for a primary fight but his decision to run as a Democrat would be based on purely practical considerations.
I am thinking about running for president. And the issue of whether you run as an independent, with the necessity of setting up a 50-state infrastructure, running as a Democrat thats something that Im looking at right now, he said.
MOre..
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/217667-sanders-i-may-run-as-a-dem-but-the-issue-is-not-hillary
mahalo merrily~ thanks for the links and I Encouraged, Bernie~
merrily
(45,251 posts)if he will run as an Indie or as a Dem.
The gist was that running as Indie is daunting because he would need to set up infrastructure in 50 states, but he thinks running as an Indie might help him appeal more to voters who seek a change. Personally, I think he is wrong about the appeal bit.
Perot had billions he was willing to sink into his Presidential run. I think that is the only reason he did as well as he did as an Indie--and even that was a long time ago. I think people are far more likely to vote for a Dem or a Republican.
Cha
(297,154 posts)message to get there in atmosphere.
I think his Indie streak would come through loud and clear if he were to switch parties and run against Hillary in the Primary. Again, his voice needs to be heard.
merrily
(45,251 posts)As we all know, it takes money to run, even to run and lose; and I don't think he is going to be able to raise it on his own. The big Dem donors are not going to want the vote split.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)K&R
merrily
(45,251 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)And not being a member of either Party, Bernie would get no where.
This is an even dumber person to tout as Messiah.
merrily
(45,251 posts)As far as Bernie specifically, if he runs at all, it is very likely he will run as a Dem. If he runs as an Indie, I will worry about your comment then.
And, of course, no one touted Sanders or anyone else as a Messiah, so no reason to exhaust that poo straw man.
treestar
(82,383 posts)So now he should be POTUS. No mention of congress. As I said, no one cares who ends up in Congress, and yes, they think Bernie will do what Obama couldn't, regardless. He's just the next proposed benevolent dictator.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sen. Sanders did not decide to run because he was on MTP. MTP had Sanders on because Sanders has been exploring a run for the Presidency for some time now. Surprised you hadn't heard.
in an interview with The Nation on March 6, 2014, Sanders stated that he is "prepared to run for President of the United States" in 2016.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
And, I might add, so far he is the only potential candidate to be honest about that and not ludicrously coy, as though the Presidency were some kind of inside joke.
One of the reasons that Sanders might have been exploring a run is that there was a draft Bernie for 2012 movement back in 2010 or 2011, when some Dems were desperate for a choice in 2012, rather than a coronation. Surprised you hadn't heard of that, either.
Another reason that Sanders might have been exploring a run is that no one else speaks out as frankly against the oligarchy in general and the Koch brothers in particular and he needs to get that message out, win, lose or draw. Am I thrilled that someone besides MSNBC finally had to give air time to that? You bet I am.
As far as your comment about Congress, it applies to any POTUS and it's pretty much bs anyway. Unless the 60 vote rule changes, nothing much new is going to happen. January 2009 -January 2011 was a unique opportunity that some would say was not used well. In any event, we are not going to see any time soon, an overwhelming Dem majority in the House, 60 in the Dem Caucus and a Dem in the White House all at the same time.
Besides, Bernie does care about Congress. From his wiki:
Possible 2016 presidential run
In a March 6, 2014 interview with The Nation, Sanders stated that he is "prepared to run for President of the United States" in 2016[6] but did not officially announce a campaign. When pressed on the issue, Sanders said, "If the question is am I actively right now organizing and raising money and so forth for a campaign for president, I am not doing that. On the other hand, am I talking to people around the country? Yes, I am. Will I be doing some traveling around the country? Yes, I will be. But I think its premature to be talking about a campaign when we still have a 2014 congressional race in front of us."[6]
Facts trump again.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Links in the OP.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Also, excuse me if I am a bad thread parent for a bit.
Thank you.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I don't want him to run and if he does I'll never forgive him for becoming the Ralph Nader of 2016.
If he decides to join the Democratic Party and run in the primaries, cool. I won't be supporting him in the primaries but the more the merrier.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Saw this just as I was about to check out.
merrily
(45,251 posts)and there is no Nader issue at all doesn't really matter?
Response to merrily (Reply #69)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If he decides to join the Democratic Party and run in the primaries, cool. I won't be supporting him in the primaries but the more the merrier.
The petititon is to encourage him to participate in the Dem primary.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)of a team.
merrily
(45,251 posts)if he can get the money and the support.
Maybe there's a petition for her somewhere on the net, too?
I really only googled for him, after MTP.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)I will work my ass off for Bernie.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Links are in the OP. Thank you.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)If not, why would we want him to ensure a Rand Paul or Mitt Romney victory in 2016?
merrily
(45,251 posts)There is no issue of splitting the Dem vote in the general to help elect a Republican.
I thought just a glance at the link at the beginning of the OP would make that clear and certainly clicking on the link would make it clear. However, several people seem to be posting after reading only the thread title.
I've now tried clarifying the OP with bolded language, but it probably will not matter. I don't think people raising the point are actually concerned about that point anyway. Seems they just don't want Sanders in the race, period. I need to stop assuming people actually mean what they post.