General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSen. Kirsten Gillibrand: "I wasn't in a place where I could tell him to go fuck himself."
"If I could have just melted in tears, I would have. But I had to just sit there and talk to him and I switched the subject and I didn't hear another word he said, but I wasn't in a place where I could tell him to go fuck himself."
-- Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), in an interview on HuffPost Live, on a labor leader who told her she was too fat to win a statewide election.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/15/gillibrand-harassment_n_5824014.html
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Paladin
(28,246 posts)I hope Senator Gillibrand is in the process of using every one of them against that sorry prick.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)That would be an abuse of her position. She's better than that.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)3-rd-way, anti-labor, destroyer of the middle class!
pscot
(21,024 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)and Fuck Off, from me.
merrily
(45,251 posts)But Howard Taft, Teddy Roosevelt, Grover Cleveland, seemed to do all right at the polls at a time when being heavier was nowhere near as common in the US as it is now.
So did Barbara Jordan, Bella Abzug and some current female members of Congress and the Senate whom I will not call by name who were/are far from stick figures.
More recently, Chris Christie (pre-surgery), Huckabee (pre-surgery), did more than okay, despite being "fluffy."
So, what was really going on in this guy's mind?
packman
(16,296 posts)at one time a corpulent , rotund man was regarded as an image to aspire to because it reflected success and wealth. Even a "beefy"women was a desired standard at various times. It is just recently with our obsession with body image that the willowy look has become the goal - and diet fad, gyms, and marketing gurus have milked it for every penny they can.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Yet, as a nation, we get heavier.
My father was always shouting at me to eat more.
Called me a skeleton. Trust me, I was not a skeleton. Not fluffy, but far from a skeleton
I guess he had some visceral connection to that era.
packman
(16,296 posts)and were obsessed , I think, with making sure we three kids cleaned our plate with the admonition of "starving kids in India" and telling us how they worked all day for a 1/2 bushel of green beans or shoveling coal (coal company would dump the coal on the side of the house and it would be shoveled into the basement for the furnace) for a pint of milk and a bit of butter.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I did get "people are starving all over." I never understood how forcing myself to eat more was going to help them, why my father did not just give some starving person the rest of the food instead of urging me to eat it.
Meanwhile, he was skinny himself, until he was forced into retirement.
Nay
(12,051 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)taking bigger helpings, or seconds, going to do anything but decrease the available food supply?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)is a decidedly euro-centric beauty standard ... and then, only in the past 50 years, or so.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Probably not, but seriously...why is "fluffy" anything but a veiled term for "fat?" That comedian dude who uses it is not "fluffy." Far from it, unless you mean "big & hairy." It is like when we use asterisks to pretend we're not actually typing the word "FUCK." Everyone knows exactly what you mean. What is the point of not just saying it? If you can get behind the idea of body acceptance, why not language acceptance? Why do you need to come up with a cute, cuddly term to deflect from the word you actually mean and want people to accept?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Was that to avoid posting "Can you stop calling it "Fluffy?"
Everyone knows exactly what you mean.
Apparently not.
Atman
(31,464 posts)This comedian has lots of people using the term "fluffy." I got a post on FB just today about a "fluffy" guy. So sure, if it makes YOU feel better, please stop using the term "fluffy." It refers to fabrics and plush toys and kittens. It has nothing to do with one's weight. It's like calling air "wet." It's just the wrong term being used for all the wrong reasons.
merrily
(45,251 posts)enclosed in quotation marks by me for good reason, and you are calling a two sentence response from me over-analyzing?
All righty.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Why is she protecting this horrible person?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Of course, they're wrong and they know it. Shit stirring, pure and simple, and blaming the victim, as usual
She's not the one who is wrong here. They are.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)We already know who the victim is. Why can't we be told who the perpetrator was?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)we should respect her decision. She is doing so for her own reason.
merrily
(45,251 posts)right wing shit stirring.
Why is the right so hot for her to reveal his name and to shame the victim (as usual) for not revealing his name? Why do you join that RW chorus? How is learning his name going to improve your life? Or Joe Scarborough's?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)if they thought that their behavior would be publicly exposed. For all we know the perpetrator is still engaging in that kind of conduct.
I guess I am just less tolerant than you of this kind of thing. You seem to think I am being too hard on the guy, but I really hate to see women treated like that.
merrily
(45,251 posts)If still alive, this guy knows exactly who he is and knows Gillebrand can name him whenever she wishes. If that doesn't deter him, nothing will. Once he is named, he has nothing to lose.
You seem to think I am being too hard on the guy,
Really? Is this guy's name Gillebrand? Is he the victim? Because everything I've posted to you so far has been to the effect that the right should stop blaming the victim and this is Gillebrand's decision.
How you get out of that that I think you are being too hard on the asshat is beyond me. Nice try.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I think that when a guy does that kind of thing he deserves to be publicly named and embarrassed. Obviously you do not agree. But there is clearly no point in continuing to argue this point.
merrily
(45,251 posts)even though my prior post a minute ago pointed out that I never said anything about the perp. What bs.
Atman
(31,464 posts)They're very nice, proud to have them in my portfolio. But she was quite self-conscious about her post-baby weight. We had to do lots of tight cropping of the photos. I find it refreshing to hear a politician to be so candid. Exactly the kind of language most "real people" would use in such a situation.
glowing
(12,233 posts)Seems quite a few men had opinions on her weight post baby and it was all pretty disgusting. No matter what you say to yourself, if you hear it all the time, you start thinking it... Especially post baby when things are just not quite back to place yet and there is a new baby at home to top off the stress.
HelenWheels
(2,284 posts)Instead of crying about being derided for being fat she should get up on her hind legs and tell these people to back off. She exhibits weakness by acting like she can't defend herself.
Atman
(31,464 posts)She DID defend herself. Any politician worth their salary (and there are very few) knows that you cannot publicly deride the head of an organization whose vote you need. It's a sad truth about politics. Gillibrand stated that she wanted to tell the guy to "fuck off." But her cooler head prevailed. She maintained decorum and respect, even when it may not have been deserved. She's a class act, even if I don't agree with all of her positions.