General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSeabiscuit couldn't win.
The horse was too small.
The horse was abused.
The jockey was too big.
The jockey was blind in one eye.
The horse broke its leg.
The jockey broke his leg.
Seabiscuit couldn't win... except when he did, because he had heart.
Bernie Sanders has heart.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)In fact, there is an "election" held prior to a horse race.
The iron law of pari-mutuel wagering, and this has been empirically constant over decades, is that the favorite - i.e. the one receiving the most "votes" - only wins 1/3 of the time.
Elections aren't decided by the candidates, they are decided by the voters.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)when most everyone else had written him off.
Most of the time elections are decided by which candidate connects with the most voters.
The candidates; do in fact have some measure of control over how many voters they connect with via their decisions, speeches and actions.
When the people believe said candidate is connecting with their concerns, they will work, volunteer and vote for that candidate, this is a true meeting of the hearts and minds.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)To paraphrase President Andrew Shepard from the 1995 film "The American President:"
brooklynite
(94,510 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)It's only a lighthearted analogy to say that underdogs can and do win. An encouragement for us Bernie supporters. His candidacy can change the tone of the race, even if he doesn't win.
Would you also say the same if Elizabeth Warren were thinking of running?
Your post is about your partisanship, not any "false equivalency."
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)because I haven't even begun thinking about 2016 other than I will retire that year.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)SMH
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:42 AM - Edit history (1)
the level of visuals we're reduced to?
Makes as much sense as your post.
edited to add what I said up-thread:
It was obvious to me that UJ's post was a jaunty analogy to say that underdogs can and do win. An encouragement for us Bernie supporters. Bernie's candidacy would change the tone of the race, even if he doesn't win. Btw, you have a problem with cartoons being posted on DU too?
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Watched it many times, cried each time.
My sincere hope is that Bernie will run and win.
Thanks for posting this, Uncle Joe.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Thanks for the thanks, Duppers.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)cheers.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)And whoever runs against Clinton will be hyped, without a question.
If Clinton doesn't get torn down and eviscerated by the media she walks right into the White House. This is exactly what happened in 2008.
This is one reason I'm only about 50/50 that Clinton might choose not to run. She just might not want to deal with it.
tritsofme
(17,376 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)They stole Ohio under the cover of night.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)We have to have hope..
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)without hope, all is lost.
Peace to you.