Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:16 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
Democrats turn on Debbie Wasserman Schultz -
The party has lost confidence in her as a unifying leader and a party spokesperson. | AP Photo
By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE | 9/17/14 5:46 PM EDT Updated: 9/17/14 8:51 PM EDT Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in a behind-the-scenes struggle with the White House, congressional Democrats and Washington insiders who have lost confidence in her as both a unifying leader and reliable party spokesperson at a time when they need her most. Long-simmering doubts about her have reached a peak after two recent public flubs: criticizing the White House’s handling of the border crisis and comparing the tea party to wife beaters. The perception of critics is that Wasserman Schultz spends more energy tending to her own political ambitions than helping Democrats win. This includes using meetings with DNC donors to solicit contributions for her own PAC and campaign committee, traveling to uncompetitive districts to court House colleagues for her potential leadership bid and having DNC-paid staff focus on her personal political agenda. She’s become a liability to the DNC, and even to her own prospects, critics say. “I guess the best way to describe it is, it’s not that she’s losing a duel anywhere, it’s that she seems to keep shooting herself in the foot before she even gets the gun out of the holster,” said John Morgan, a major donor in Wasserman Schultz’s home state of Florida. The stakes are high. Wasserman Schultz is a high-profile national figure who helped raise millions of dollars and served as a Democratic messenger to female voters during a presidential election in which Obama needed to exploit the gender gap to win, but November’s already difficult midterms are looming. One example that sources point to as particularly troubling: Wasserman Schultz repeatedly trying to get the DNC to cover the costs of her wardrobe. In 2012, Wasserman Schultz attempted to get the DNC to pay for her clothing at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, multiple sources say, but was blocked by staff in the committee’s Capitol Hill headquarters and at President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign headquarters in Chicago. She asked again around Obama’s inauguration in 2013, pushing so hard that Obama senior adviser — and one-time Wasserman Schultz booster — Valerie Jarrett had to call her directly to get her to stop. (Jarrett said she does not recall that conversation.) One more time, according to independent sources with direct knowledge of the conversations, she tried again, asking for the DNC to buy clothing for the 2013 White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Wasserman Schultz denies that she ever tried to get the DNC to pick up her clothing tab. “I think that would be a totally inappropriate use of DNC funds,” she said in a statement. “I never asked someone to do that for me, I would hope that no one would seek that on my behalf, and I’m not aware that anyone did.” Tracie Pough, Wasserman Schultz’s chief of staff at the DNC and her congressional office, was also involved in making inquiries about buying the clothing, according to sources. Pough denies making, directing or being aware of any inquiries. But sources with knowledge of the discussions say Wasserman Schultz’s efforts couldn’t have been clearer. “She felt firmly that it should happen,” said a then-DNC staffer of the clothing request. “Even after it was explained that it couldn’t, she remained indignant.” This story is based on interviews with three dozen current and former DNC staffers, committee officers, elected officials, state party leaders and top Democratic operatives in Washington and across the country. Many expect a nascent Clinton campaign will engineer her ouster. Hurt feelings go back to spring 2008, when while serving as a co-chair of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Wasserman Schultz secretly reached out to the Obama campaign to pledge her support once the primary was over, sources say. Meanwhile, the Obama team was so serious about replacing her after 2012 that they found a replacement candidate to back before deciding against it, according to people familiar with those discussions. Obama and Wasserman Schultz have rarely even talked since 2011. They don’t meet about strategy or messaging. They don’t talk much on the phone. Instead, the DNC chairwoman stakes out the president of the United States at the end of photo lines at events and fundraisers. “You need another picture, Debbie?” Obama tends to say, according to people who’ve been there for the encounters. http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/democrats-debbie-wasserman-schultz-111077_Page2.html#ixzz3DclmYe68 much more at link above... This is on the heels of true shenanigans for years in Florida, by Shutlz
|
66 replies, 7191 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | OP |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #1 | |
oldandhappy | Sep 2014 | #2 | |
tularetom | Sep 2014 | #3 | |
Mnpaul | Sep 2014 | #63 | |
LawDeeDah | Sep 2014 | #4 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #5 | |
cali | Sep 2014 | #6 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #8 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Sep 2014 | #52 | |
ChiciB1 | Sep 2014 | #32 | |
Rowdyboy | Sep 2014 | #7 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #9 | |
LondonReign2 | Sep 2014 | #26 | |
BuelahWitch | Sep 2014 | #48 | |
TeamPooka | Sep 2014 | #21 | |
closeupready | Sep 2014 | #44 | |
Ikonoklast | Sep 2014 | #10 | |
QC | Sep 2014 | #11 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #13 | |
bullwinkle428 | Sep 2014 | #15 | |
QC | Sep 2014 | #16 | |
Eleanors38 | Sep 2014 | #12 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #14 | |
sabrina 1 | Sep 2014 | #17 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #18 | |
ChiciB1 | Sep 2014 | #34 | |
Boom Sound 416 | Sep 2014 | #19 | |
sabrina 1 | Sep 2014 | #37 | |
Boom Sound 416 | Sep 2014 | #41 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Sep 2014 | #54 | |
hatrack | Sep 2014 | #56 | |
Raine1967 | Sep 2014 | #40 | |
Boom Sound 416 | Sep 2014 | #42 | |
Raine1967 | Sep 2014 | #45 | |
oneshooter | Sep 2014 | #49 | |
madfloridian | Sep 2014 | #20 | |
Octafish | Sep 2014 | #22 | |
Psephos | Sep 2014 | #47 | |
Baitball Blogger | Sep 2014 | #23 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #24 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #25 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #29 | |
Marr | Sep 2014 | #27 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #30 | |
Oilwellian | Sep 2014 | #28 | |
ChiciB1 | Sep 2014 | #31 | |
MohRokTah | Sep 2014 | #33 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #35 | |
MohRokTah | Sep 2014 | #36 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #38 | |
joeybee12 | Sep 2014 | #39 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #43 | |
Raine1967 | Sep 2014 | #46 | |
hobbit709 | Sep 2014 | #50 | |
B Calm | Sep 2014 | #51 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Sep 2014 | #53 | |
Romulox | Sep 2014 | #55 | |
vi5 | Sep 2014 | #57 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #58 | |
vi5 | Sep 2014 | #59 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #60 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #61 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #62 | |
Warren DeMontague | Sep 2014 | #64 | |
TheNutcracker | Sep 2014 | #65 | |
Warren DeMontague | Sep 2014 | #66 |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:18 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
1. Florida cried out when she endorsed repukes over Dems who won hard fought primaries
Democrats were not heard.
But John Morgan is being heard...... |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:24 PM
oldandhappy (6,719 posts)
2. infighting
not effective
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:25 PM
tularetom (23,664 posts)
3. For years I have suspected there was no there there
I occasionally heard her on some radio show and and I was stunned by how uninformed and shallow her responses were.
I was also troubled by her refusal to devote DNC resources to the campaigns of some promising progressive Democratic candidates. It's amazing that so incompetent an individual has been able to hold onto a position like this for so long a time. |
Response to tularetom (Reply #3)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 03:33 AM
Mnpaul (3,655 posts)
63. She is a disaster on the Sunday talk shows
She is not helping us one bit. Long winded answers, short on facts, usually dodges the tough questions. She needs to be gone and now.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:27 PM
LawDeeDah (1,596 posts)
4. She works for the Clintons.
Many expect a nascent Clinton campaign will engineer her ouster. Hurt feelings go back to spring 2008, when while serving as a co-chair of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Wasserman Schultz secretly reached out to the Obama campaign to pledge her support once the primary was over, sources say.
I'm not sure I believe this part. |
Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #4)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:28 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
5. and herself! Fine, then RESIGN as the one working for ALL!
Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #4)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:29 PM
cali (114,904 posts)
6. you didn't read the article, did you?
She reached out to Obama in 2008 behind Hillary's back and before the end of Clinton's campaign. That is the the sort of thing that puts you permanently on a shit list.
|
Response to cali (Reply #6)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:38 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
8. Cali, there is a lot more history of Wasserman shenanigans in FLA than the article gets into.
Response to cali (Reply #6)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 07:54 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,918 posts)
52. Wouldn't be surprised if this behind the scenes maneuvering turns out having Hillary's fingerprints all over it - not that DWS didn't need to go anyway.
Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #4)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:40 PM
ChiciB1 (15,435 posts)
32. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT PART AT ALL! n/t
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:37 PM
Rowdyboy (22,057 posts)
7. Her refusal to campaign again her Florida republican colleagues says it all
She has no business in the party leadership in any way
|
Response to Rowdyboy (Reply #7)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:44 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
9. That is true, and worse she would endorse a republican.
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #9)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:18 PM
LondonReign2 (5,213 posts)
26. She endorsd republicans???
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #9)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:33 AM
BuelahWitch (9,083 posts)
48. People like that don't deserve the role of Chairperson
Obama should have kicked her out right there.
|
Response to Rowdyboy (Reply #7)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:47 PM
TeamPooka (22,779 posts)
21. Yup, wtf was she thinking?
Response to TeamPooka (Reply #21)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 10:45 PM
closeupready (29,503 posts)
44. Maybe she was thinking, let me turn on Democrats before they turn on me.
LOL, just kidding - I mean, I'm sure she's a good person, but I would NOT call her a good Democrat. NEVER endorse your opposition. EVER EVER EVER.
But you know, I'm weird that way, I guess. ![]() |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 12:46 PM
Ikonoklast (23,973 posts)
10. She was a horrible choice for the job to begin with.
Ineffective, waffling, and more concerned shown for her own ambitions than what was good for the party.
Never liked her one bit. |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:00 PM
QC (26,371 posts)
11. We here at DU knew she was a disaster
when she was appointed. The reaction was mostly disbelief and horror around here.
|
Response to QC (Reply #11)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:10 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
13. Good to hear, as Florida has cried out for help here, during her shenanigans in 06
Response to QC (Reply #11)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:18 PM
bullwinkle428 (20,587 posts)
15. + a million. A few here at DU called us out as "bad Democrats"
for criticizing her when she endorsed Republicans a few years back.
|
Response to bullwinkle428 (Reply #15)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:23 PM
QC (26,371 posts)
16. We were letting the team down!!!
I remember that well. The White House chose her, and who were we to question that?
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:03 PM
Eleanors38 (18,318 posts)
12. Ironic, John Morgan uses gun metaphors regarding WS...
She is clumsily anti-gun in a state that kicked off the modern movement for concealed-carry. Regardless of ones views on guns, that is leading with your chin. She became a bad fart in a good VW for stuff like that.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:10 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
14. One more K&R to the greatest page, and give Florida the hug it needs!
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:37 PM
sabrina 1 (62,325 posts)
17. She just couldn't bring herself to go all out against her Republican buddies when it was
a choice between them and a progressive Dem.
Removing her from that position would be a good start to reforming the Dem Party, so long as she is not replaced with another Third Way Dino. |
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #17)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:11 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
18. EXACTLY! She works against PROGRESSIVES! Her history proves that!
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #18)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:42 PM
ChiciB1 (15,435 posts)
34. What Was The Story About Jose Diaz-Balart??
Never found out what went on with them. They are or were Repukes at the time.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:25 PM
Boom Sound 416 (4,185 posts)
19. You know it's a hit peice when they bring up wardrobe
Response to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #19)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 06:10 PM
sabrina 1 (62,325 posts)
37. The wardrobe is a minor issue, the big issue with her has always been
her refusal to help Progressive Dems, even going so far as to support Republicans. She does NOT belong in that position and it's too bad it has taken so long to replace her. She has done a lot of harm to the chances of putting good Progressive Democrats in Congress.
|
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #37)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 10:31 PM
Boom Sound 416 (4,185 posts)
41. Agreed, that's why it's a hit peice
To mention it at all shows this.
But in the current atmosphere it's toxic. And it's a bit of a reoccurring method. What's so red herring about the issue itself it's a completely reasonable expense throughout business and politics, but it's turned into a class warfare weapon. You're reasons are spot on but bloodless. |
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #37)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:06 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,918 posts)
54. Yes, sadly, that is my biggest criticism also, but I'm afraid her replacement, as dictated by the "powers that be," will be just as bad and, possibly, worse.
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #54)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:10 AM
hatrack (57,730 posts)
56. Maybe they can get Mario Cuomo, or Rahm . . . .
![]() |
Response to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #19)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 06:29 PM
Raine1967 (11,567 posts)
40. You noticed that as well, I see.
I might be the only one in this thread that will say I thought she could be doing a better job… but I sure as hell am not going to toss her under the bus from some shit ht piece from Politico.
This is a hit piece. It's red meat. |
Response to Raine1967 (Reply #40)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 10:32 PM
Boom Sound 416 (4,185 posts)
42. The reddest
Response to Boom Sound 416 (Reply #42)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 11:29 PM
Raine1967 (11,567 posts)
45. This entire thread is a turd. EOM.
Response to Raine1967 (Reply #45)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 07:31 AM
oneshooter (8,613 posts)
49. Jury results
On Fri Sep 19, 2014, 05:24 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
This entire thread is a turd. EOM. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5557340 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS Let the jury decide You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Sep 19, 2014, 05:30 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: It's an opinion, get over it. Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Personal opinion. Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: ummm, if you cannot explain why you feel a post is alert/hide worthy....why are you alerting? Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Let the Jury decide? That is a lame explanation for alerting a threat - LET THE JURY DECIDE???? Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: This is a waste of time. Get over your hurt fee-fees and buck up little camper! Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: This is a comment on the post, not a comment on a person. No personal attack. Why would you even alert? Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:43 PM
madfloridian (88,117 posts)
20. Debbie has worked against progressive Democrats in Florida for years. Links to prove.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2616
Wasserman Schultz insults FL Dem candidate...says "don't pull that populist stuff on me." She undermined Annette Taddeo who is Crist's running mate now. http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2647 She and Kendrick Meek supported FL Republican candidates against their own party guys. http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2470 I have lots more. |
Response to madfloridian (Reply #20)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 02:49 PM
Octafish (55,745 posts)
22. She seemed unaware of the unconstitutional, too.
The remarkable, unfathomable ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Chair of the Democratic National Committee is completely unaware of one of the biggest stories of the Obama years Glenn Greenwald theguardian.com, Friday 19 October 2012 20.38 ED On 29 May 2012, the New York Times published a remarkable 6,000-word story on its front page about what it termed President Obama's "kill list". It detailed the president's personal role in deciding which individuals will end up being targeted for assassination by the CIA based on Obama's secret, unchecked decree that they are "terrorists" and deserve to die. Based on interviews with "three dozen of his current and former advisers", the Times' Jo Becker and Scott Shane provided extraordinary detail about Obama's actions, including how he "por[es] over terrorist suspects' biographies on what one official calls the macabre 'baseball cards'" and how he "insist[s] on approving every new name on an expanding 'kill list'". At a weekly White House meeting dubbed "Terror Tuesdays", Obama then decides who will die without a whiff of due process, transparency or oversight. It was this process that resulted in the death of US citizen Anwar Awlaki in Yemen, and then two weeks later, the killing of his 16-year-old American son, Abdulrahman, by drone. The Times "kill list" story made a huge impact and was widely discussed and condemned by media figures, politicians, analysts, and commentators. Among other outlets, the New York Times itself harshly editorialized against Obama's program in an editorial entitled "Too Much Power For a President", denouncing the revelations as "very troubling" and argued: "No one in that position should be able to unilaterally order the killing of American citizens or foreigners located far from a battlefield - depriving Americans of their due-process rights - without the consent of someone outside his political inner circle." That Obama has a "kill list" has been known since January, 2010, and has been widely reported and discussed in every major American newspaper since April 2010. A major controversy over chronic White House leaks often featured complaints about this article (New York Times, 5 June 2012: "Senators to Open Inquiry Into 'Kill List' and Iran Security Leaks" ![]() But Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Democratic Congresswoman from Florida and the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, does not know about any of this. She has never heard of any of it. She has managed to remain completely ignorant about the fact that President Obama has asserted and exercised the power to secretly place human beings, including US citizens, on his "kill list" and then order the CIA to extinguish their lives. CONTINUED... http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/20/wasserman-schultz-kill-list Personally, I believe supporting the Bill of Rights is something ALL Democrats should do. |
Response to Octafish (Reply #22)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:15 AM
Psephos (8,032 posts)
47. great post n/t
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 03:49 PM
Baitball Blogger (45,740 posts)
23. Yeah, and I guess we should not say a word about how she got on
John Morgan's bad side by not endorsing a marijuana bill he supported.
Though I agree that Schultz is the kind of Democrat that does nothing to excite the base. But few do in Florida. |
Response to Baitball Blogger (Reply #23)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:14 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
24. Oh there are a few who excite and energize, but they are killed off by the debby's in FLA
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #24)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:15 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
25. PS...I did not want to inflame but you're right about Morgan's Medical Marijuana initiative.
She's a real bummer for progressives and farming candidates in Florida.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #25)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:27 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
29. PSS. After Morgan spent over a million because 88% of Floridians WANTED it!
Now, because of right wing ads...the numbers are coming down. But Little Debby did not help matters. Never did.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:19 PM
Marr (20,317 posts)
27. Didn't she turn on Democrats first? /nt
Response to Marr (Reply #27)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:29 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
30. Good point! She sure did turn on dems first
Even Obama gets it, asking at fundraisers while she waits for a pic last....
"Hi Debby, did you need another photo?" Good for the president. |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:27 PM
Oilwellian (12,647 posts)
28. Good riddance to bad rubbish n/t
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:39 PM
ChiciB1 (15,435 posts)
31. SHE WAS A BAD CHOICE FROM THE GET-GO!
I recall saying it when she became the head of the party! She's extremely DLC and here in FL many know she was never a fighter. I'm shocked to hear that the Clintons have a problem with her because she was cut from the same cloth IMO. And I've always heard stories about her and the Repuke Party down here. Never thought she would be the head so don't know real facts about the stories here in FL. Just knew many Dems didn't trust her.
I realize she's National, but here in FL the Democratic Party seems to be doing VERY LITTLE to help Charlie Crist. I haven't heard a peep from them regarding his run for Governor! And guess who's ahead in the polls even though his approval rating doesn't even top 30%, RICK SCOTT! |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:41 PM
MohRokTah (15,429 posts)
33. It's Politico and it's not well sourced.
I'll take this story with a couple of truckloads of salt.
|
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #33)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:48 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
35. please read the comments, the florida activists are well sourced.
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #35)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 04:49 PM
MohRokTah (15,429 posts)
36. Are they well sourced in DC?
No.
Her antics in Florida are beside the point of the article. |
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #36)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 06:18 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
38. Well the point is she is not and has not been supported and needs to go.
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 06:23 PM
joeybee12 (56,177 posts)
39. The only time I ever see her on TV is on Fox...nt
Response to joeybee12 (Reply #39)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 10:40 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
43. And a few here accuse the nooze source when do many dems back up this article. Go figure.
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 11:37 PM
Raine1967 (11,567 posts)
46. she's such a loser:
Political Experience
Representative, United States House of Representatives, 2005-present Chief Deputy Whip, United States House of Representatives, 2006-2008 Senior Whip, United States House of Representatives, 2005-2006 Senator, Florida State Senate, 2001-2004 Democratic Leader Pro Tempore, Florida State House of Representatives, 2000 Representative, Florida State House of Representatives, 1992-2000 Democratic Floor Leader, Florida State House of Representatives, 1998-1999 Current Legislative Committees Appropriations, Member Subcommittee on Legislative Branch, Ranking Member Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, Member Caucuses/Non-Legislative Committees Vice Chair, Democratic Party, Congressional Caucus for Womens Issues Member, Florida Supreme Court Gender Bias Study Implementation Commission Member, Southern Regional Education Board Legislative Advisory Council Chair, South Florida Democratic Caucus Vice President, Women's Political Caucus, Gwen Cherry Chapter Co-Chair, Policy Committee, Senate Democratic Caucus, 2002-2004 Member, Governor's Commission on Education, 1996-1998 Member, Florida Education Facilities Study Committee, 1994 Member, Classrooms First Task Force, 1993 Professional Experience Adjunct Instructor, Political Science, Broward Community College Specialist, Public Policy Curriculum, Nova Southeastern University Legislative Aide, Peter Deutsch, Florida State House of Representatives, 1989-1992 Religious, Civic, and other Memberships Chair, Democratic National Committee, United States House of Representatives, 2011-present Member, American Jewish Committee Board Member, American Jewish Congress Southeast Region Member, Broward National Organization for Women, South Palm Beach County Member, Hadassah Secretary, Hawkes Bluff Panel and Homeowner's Association Member, Miramar Chamber of Commerce Member, National Council of Jewish Women Board Member, National Jewish Democratic Council Board Member, National Safety Council, South Florida Chapter Member, Pembroke Pines Chamber of Congress Former Board Member, Planned Parenthood, Broward County Former Board Member, Planned Parenthood, South Palm Beach County Member, Weston Chamber of Commerce Board Member, Westside Regional Medical Center Board Member, Florida Distance Learning Network, 1995-1997 Vice President, Broward County Young Democrats, 1990-1992 Secretary, Broward County Young Democrats, 1990-1992 Secretary, Young Leadership Council, Jewish Federation, Greater Fort Lauderdale, 1989-1990 http://votesmart.org/candidate/biography/24301/debbie-wasserman-schultz#.VBujW8Zf_8s Here is her record at gov track: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/debbie_wasserman_schultz/400623a But please let's slam her. Let's totally fall for a politico hit piece. ![]() |
Response to Raine1967 (Reply #46)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 07:37 AM
hobbit709 (41,694 posts)
50. She endorsed Republicans over Democrats in races in Florida-that is a FACT regardless of the source
all of the above only shows that she knows how to play the game.
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 07:37 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
51. Blue Dog's must go! She is also against marijuana legalization.
|
Response to B Calm (Reply #51)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:02 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,918 posts)
53. I have to agree, though she did have a few noteworthy accomplishments.
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:06 AM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
55. She's a proxy for Hills. nt
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:38 AM
vi5 (13,305 posts)
57. Ah good....a scapegoat.
Is anyone naive enough to believe she's anyone but the exact type of lackluster, "centrist", Washington General type of Democrat that the White House and Congressional Dems and especially Dem "insiders" wanted to run the DNC? And now that it's quite obvious what a failure this approach is proving to be, under the bus she goes.
I despise her, but this notion that somehow the WH and all the other mealy mouthed "centrist" Dems who run the party now are pinning this on her is a joke. |
Response to vi5 (Reply #57)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:19 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
58. She will not campaign with real democrats!
She turned her back on dems long before this. Just read all the comments!
|
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #58)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 12:55 PM
vi5 (13,305 posts)
59. I know.
My point is that now everyone in power within the party are playing the "OMG we're so shocked that she's doing such a shitty job!"
Bullshit. Like a lot of issues and policies, many of us knew from the get go how this would turn out, but as always the silly leftwing hippies were told to shut the fuck up. So now putting Ms. Center Right corporatist Republican in charge of the national party is proving bad for the party and the same people who put here there in the first place are going "Who me?" Never met her!" |
Response to vi5 (Reply #59)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 01:50 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
60. Exactly! And coming out against Morgan's MM initiative when 88% of voters wanted it? WTF over!
![]() |
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 03:47 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
61. Little Debby will not be energizing the base for Hillary in Florida. That should be a problem here.
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #61)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 01:14 AM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
62. It should worry everyone who is supporting Hillary for Prez
Response to TheNutcracker (Original post)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 04:03 AM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
64. She lost me when she decided that continuing to throw cancer patients in prison for smoking pot
Was good public policy.
|
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #64)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 04:59 PM
TheNutcracker (2,104 posts)
65. She was not with 88% of Florida citizens when she said that
She's an embarrassment!
![]() |
Response to TheNutcracker (Reply #65)
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 05:57 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)