Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSouth African Jewish group: Comparing Tutu to Hitler "morally offensive"
A South African Jewish group has condemned a recent article by the chair of Likud South Africa, in which Nobel Laureate Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu is compared to Adolf Hitler.
In a statement issued Wednesday, South African Jewish Voices for a Just Peace (JVJP) respond to the piece penned by Leon Reich, and published by the South African Jewish Report (SAJR) website on September 10. The article now removed, but a cached version is viewable here is titled 'Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin says Reich' and features a crude image of Tutu as the Nazi dictator.
After noting Tutu's history and "international standing" as a moral voice, JVJP state that they "utterly reject the assumption that dissent from Zionism is equivalent to anti-Semitism" and also "take issue with the article's distorted and dishonest representation of the Palestinian solidarity movement as a movement invested in the 'destruction of Jews'" a "myth", they say, perpetuated "in order to maintain a siege mentality amongst Jews in South Africa"....
JVJP explain that they are speaking out "as Jews" because this attack on Tutu "was launched by a Jewish organisation, speaks to a Jewish audience, and frequently invokes the collective 'we' which assumes that the Jewish community is homogenous in its views".
In a statement issued Wednesday, South African Jewish Voices for a Just Peace (JVJP) respond to the piece penned by Leon Reich, and published by the South African Jewish Report (SAJR) website on September 10. The article now removed, but a cached version is viewable here is titled 'Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin says Reich' and features a crude image of Tutu as the Nazi dictator.
After noting Tutu's history and "international standing" as a moral voice, JVJP state that they "utterly reject the assumption that dissent from Zionism is equivalent to anti-Semitism" and also "take issue with the article's distorted and dishonest representation of the Palestinian solidarity movement as a movement invested in the 'destruction of Jews'" a "myth", they say, perpetuated "in order to maintain a siege mentality amongst Jews in South Africa"....
JVJP explain that they are speaking out "as Jews" because this attack on Tutu "was launched by a Jewish organisation, speaks to a Jewish audience, and frequently invokes the collective 'we' which assumes that the Jewish community is homogenous in its views".
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South African Jewish group: Comparing Tutu to Hitler "morally offensive" (Original Post)
KamaAina
Sep 2014
OP
immoderate
(20,885 posts)1. JVJP sounds like me. I identify as of that tribe.
I am a non-Zionist, atheist, Jew. Don't ask.
--imm
Aerows
(39,961 posts)2. Comparing Archbishop Desmond Tutu to Hitler?
Egads. That's not out of line or hyperbole.