General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIg Nobel Awards cover the best in bad science
http://m.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29253796Projects ranged from the semi-coherent to the truly awful. The winner this year? A Japanese study on why banana peels are slippery!
Archae
(46,314 posts)They should give out a "Hysterics over true science" award to the anti-GMO cultists like Jane Goodall and this guy.
http://americanloons.blogspot.ca/2014/09/1157-jeffery-smith.html
valerief
(53,235 posts)NUTRITION: Raquel Rubio, of IRTA, Spain, and colleagues, for their study titled "Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Infant Faeces as Potential Probiotic Starter Cultures for Fermented Sausages."
This one sounds like YouTube nonsense.
ARCTIC SCIENCE: Eigil Reimers, of the University of Oslo, Norway, and colleagues, for testing how reindeer react to seeing humans who are disguised as polar bears.
longship
(40,416 posts)She is the final authority at the Ig Nobel award ceremonies to prevent award winners from going on and on in their acceptance speeches. The Iggies take the time limit very, very seriously. As does Miss Sweetie Poo.
Witness:
I hope all of you realize how serious the Ig Nobel Prizes are. That's why so many Nobel Prize winners attend every year. Even the most brilliant scientists have a sense of humor. Thank goodness.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Archae
(46,314 posts)DJ13
(23,671 posts)I gotta know!
Thanks.....
longship
(40,416 posts)It is science that both makes one think, and makes one smile. And there are occasional awards for bad science. But that is not the purpose of the Iggies.
Amongst my favorite Ig Nobel prizes: Dead Duck Day, the first documentation of homosexual necrophilia in the mallard duck. (BTW, with pictures.)
The Iggies are amongst the greatest science awards on the planet. Actually, one Iggies winner went on to win a real Nobel Prize, and the Ig Nobel prize ceremonies is always attended by many Nobel winners.
It is a really great award in science, as long as one has a sense of humor, which most scientists do.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)The Toronto scientist explained that this type of pattern recognition was hard-wired, and even chimps experienced it.
"The face you are going to see is determined by your personal expectations or beliefs," he added.
"So, for example, Buddhists might not see Jesus on toast, but they might see a Buddha on toast."