General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFuck this: Secret Service messes up and we pay the price? No way.
The Secret Service screwed up Friday night. In a mind-boggling breach of security, a troubled former Army sniper named Omar J. Gonzalez allegedly jumped the fence at the White House, sprinted to the front door and walked in. It wasnt until he got inside that a Secret Service officer guarding the door stopped him.
And now the Secret Service which hasnt exactly covered itself in glory the past few years wants us to pay for its mistake, to once again intrude on more public space and make suspects out of millions of visitors, residents and office workers who come near the White House every day. To further encroach on the countrys most important values: our openness and our freedom.
The security gurus think they might want to keep people off the sidewalks around the nations most famous residence. Or maybe screen tourists a block away from the White House. They want to Anschluss even more public space to expand The Perimeter around 1600 Pennsylvania, amping up the feeling of hostility, fear and paranoia that already pervades the heart of our nation.
<snip>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/secret-service-messes-up-and-we-pay-the-price-no-way/2014/09/22/3c81ded0-4256-11e4-9a15-137aa0153527_story.html
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)atreides1
(16,076 posts)Funny intruding on the public wasn't the first thought after this incident:
http://www.nytimes.com/1994/09/13/us/crash-white-house-overview-unimpeded-intruder-crashes-plane-into-white-house.html
How about we fire the agents that were on duty to set an example, instead of setting up road blocks and check points that will hamper the freedom of Americans in their own Capital.
Unless of course the idea of a police state makes common sense...if that's the case then perhaps this will be the beginning?
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and then taking a chance on whether they can sprint to the White House or not.
Downing Street was gated off a few years ago IIRC.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I've walked past there 5 days a week for two years. There is no reason to close off more area.
If the guards, SS, and whoever it is on the roof did their jobs this guy would never have gotten that far.
Why didn't they turn the dogs out, why didn't the shoot the gut as he was running.
They screwed up.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Like heavily armed people showing up in the crowds during presidential speeches. These little incidents are reported from time to time, then forgotten. Does make you wonder...
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 22, 2014, 07:52 PM - Edit history (1)
If the SS had released the dogs on the guy and had locked the doors, this would have been a 24 hour story at most. I'm sorry, but if you jump the WH fence, you should expect the dogs to grab one of your extremities. Apparently the SS did not release their dogs for some reason.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)So they were concerned one of the agents chasing this guy down would get attacked by the dog instead of the guy.
Of course, what worries me is all the details that are being given out about this event. It's like a playbook for the next fence jumper that may not be less harmless.
former9thward
(31,997 posts)As in 24/7. If it was locked someone would have to be unlocking it every few seconds. That is not reasonable. I think the media is overplaying it.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I think the doors should be locked. If it prevents a future intruder from killing or injuring President Obama, his family, the WH staff or a future President and/or his/her family from being killed or injured, then it's worth it. I really don't care about the convenience to the Secret Service. If those doors had been locked, he would have been stopped cold. The Secret Service can do what it takes to lock and unlock those doors all day long, and get the locks changed if they need to. Locked doors are only common sense. This idea makes much more sense than excluding the public from an even bigger area of Washington.
We disagree.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)I'm glad that they didn't have dogs bite off his extremities.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)That is the peoples house and the president understands the risk when he runs for the office.
A big fuck that to the idea people should be kept any farther away than they already are.
Response to Egnever (Reply #5)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #34)
former9thward This message was self-deleted by its author.
Glorfindel
(9,729 posts)They seem to do a really good job guarding Buckingham Palace (and other sites). Plus, they're really decorative.
brooklynite
(94,519 posts)Journeyman
(15,031 posts)A man has broken into Buckingham Palace and spent ten minutes talking to the Queen in her bedroom.
At around 0715 BST Michael Fagan, 31, scaled the walls around the palace and shinned the drain-pipe up to the Queen's private apartments.
Barefooted and wearing a t-shirt the unemployed father of four evaded electronic alarms and palace and police guards before disturbing the Queen by opening a curtain.
The Queen was only able to raise the alarm when he asked for a cigarette.
She calmly called for a footman who held the intruder until police arrived.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/9/newsid_2498000/2498731.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fagan_incident
steve2470
(37,457 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)They just missed
steve2470
(37,457 posts)The first incident, yes, the Queen was in Buckingham Palace. The second incident, the PM was in a hotel, which should have been properly guarded. I guess we disagree.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)In 1838, aged approximately 14, he entered Buckingham Palace, disguised as a chimney sweep. He was caught by a porter in the Marble Hall and, after a chase, captured by the police in St James's Street, with Queen Victoria's underwear stuffed down his trousers. He was brought before Queen Square Police Court on 14 December. It turned out that he had frequently mentioned his intention to enter the palace to his employer, a builder. Although he had apparently stolen linen and a regimental sword from the palace, he was acquitted by the jury.
On 30 November 1840, nine days after the birth of Queen Victoria's first child, Princess Victoria, he "scaled the wall of Buckingham Palace about half-way up Constitution Hill", entered the palace, and left it undetected. On 1 December 1840, he broke in again. Shortly after midnight a nurse discovered him under a sofa in the Queen's dressing room and he was arrested. His father's plea of insanity being without success, he was sentenced to three months in a house of correction. The 1840 incident caused a stir because initially it was feared that it might affect the Queen, happening so shortly after childbirth.
Before his release from Tothill Fields Prison on 2 March 1841, attempts were made to persuade Edward Jones to join the Navy. On 15 March 1841, after a snack in one of the royal apartments, "the boy Jones" was caught by the reinforced police force guarding the palace. This time, he was sentenced to three months hard labour. This third incident caused a furore, and three additional palace sentries were appointed...[Afterwards] Jones became an alcoholic and a burglar, and later went to Australia, where he became the town crier of Perth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_boy_Jones
on edit: And this guy..."In September 2004 member Jason Hatch climbed the walls of Buckingham Palace dressed as Batman...."
FSogol
(45,481 posts)The proper thing to do during a potential attack is to open fire. The Secret Service (is it really necessary to refer to them as the SS?) shows some restraint and is now criticized.
The Secret Service has had some serious problems lately. Time to fire the people responsible. Major changes are unnecessary and are not required by one guy approaching the building after the President has left.
cali
(114,904 posts)lock the doors, pay attention. I believe one person has said the SS should have shot the guy.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)from climbing over the White House fence, running across the lawn, and enterING the building.
They've been bragging about how "humanely" the jumper was treated. The more I look at this picture, the more I think that's a cover story for their just not seeing him until he got inside the door.
Have someone patrolling both sides of the fence. Have someone patrolling the lawn area. Have someone on guard outside the front door. Have someone on guard inside the front door. That way, if no one felt like chasing the guy, he wouldn't have gotten in.
I'm willing to bet that the guy who showed up the next day did so because he felt empowered when he saw or heard about this.
rocktivity
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)People aren't joining the secret service for some reason... maybe it's because the one's most likely think Obama is from Kenya.
However, I'd suggest maybe borrowing some folks from the FBI, maybe a few from the DC police to patrol more regularly outside the fence. I see mounted DC cops at the Lincoln Memorial all the time. They should be patrolling the White House instead (one mounted officer at the memorial would probably be enough). Have the WH SS canine units patrol the grounds more regularly. Hell, build a mote on the inside part of the fence but don't block off more public access from a building that used to be open to the public.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)we need to have a very large change in mindset among all law enforcement agencies that their convenience isn't more important than the liberty and lives of those they are supposed to be serving - you know, the people who pay their salaries.
We could also quit jumping into every conflict in the world to satisfy defense contractors and spend money at home instead of sending manpower and treasure into situations that are none of our concern.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)rocktivity
onenote
(42,700 posts)When Reagan was shot, there were around 1500 Secret Service agents. Today, there are over 3000 special agents and another 1200 uniformed division agents.
I haven't seen any reports of the Secret Service claiming that they're having trouble recruiting agents. Do you have a link?
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Get the hell back to Dodge! Double the number since Reagan years? 3000 of them? They can damn well secure the perimetr at the White House. What the hell? Were they eating donuts and playing cards in the guard house?
FSogol
(45,481 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)That doesn't mean what the writer thinks it means.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anschluss
cali
(114,904 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)any Law Enforcement agency to accept responsibility for screwing up anymore?
The default response is "let the public pay the price." Oh, we shot a 12 year old? Oops, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Oh, we nearly killed a 2 month year old in its crib with a flash grenade when conducting a no-knock raid on the wrong house? Oh, well, the police have to keep themselves safe. Oh, we shot somebody's dog in its own back yard when we leaped a private fence in pursuit of a suspect? A dog certainly isn't worth inconveniencing an officer.
When you start firing people and taking away their pensions for incompetence instead of giving them paid vacations, they will start taking their jobs more seriously. Those responsible for security need to be held accountable and responsible for ... uh, security, not the general public. This mentality that the convenience of LEO's is more important than the liberty and lives of those they are supposed to be serving has run amok.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)You need security cameras with smart software programs that can tell the difference between human forms and shadows cast by trees. Where a human is moving in a no-trespassing zone, the alarms should be set off to warn people.
I still don't know why this software is not available yet for security cams.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The reason that we used to send aircraft toward Russia and the reason Russia still sends aircraft toward our defense zones is to watch the tracking radar systems light up, and thus gain valuable information about the defense systems with an eye toward penetrating them.
In order to counter that type of testing, you want to act "within" the limits of the system. If the severity of a threat can be assessed as it approaches, then it is preferable not to demonstrate the outside limits of the effectiveness of the defensive system, to avoid having the capabilities of the defensive system fully exposed.
The situation here is that the President and his family were not on the premises. If he had already been confidently flagged as "unarmed nutter" mid-sprint, then grabbing him at the door is preferable to "demonstrate hidden death ray device on roof".
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)OMG, don't give them ideas!
Response to jberryhill (Reply #30)
Generic Other This message was self-deleted by its author.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I imagine DU would have wanted him shot.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)Making it harder for people to climb over it? That's one solution.
Modify the top of the fence so that it turns outward.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)rickford66
(5,523 posts)Drunken sailors needed a pit stop. Why not stop and yell Tricky Dicky at the same time? Sounded like a good idea. I guess security wasn't as sophisticated back then either.
2banon
(7,321 posts)These kinds of knee jerk reactions is exactly why "conspiracy theories" have exploded during the past decade and a half.
Wouldn't it be nice and pleasant for democracy if there were no longer demonstrations allowed ever in front of or near white house.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)and it's the first thing he mentioned because it's really hard to get a permit for protests in the park in PA Ave (he has experience being a professional protester).
2banon
(7,321 posts)FSogol
(45,481 posts)Creative and thought provoking protests make the news. Pounding a drum or chanting at the WH fence is a waste of time, regardless of the intentions. Sorry, but that's a fact. Last WH fence protest that made any type of national news? Daniel Cho protesting DADT 4 or 5 years ago.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Did the guy get over the fence? Yep.
Did the guy hurt anyone? Nope.
The guy ran across the grass and was promptly arrested when he stepped into the building. He did not appear to be carrying a weapon or a bomb, so he did not appear to be an immediate threat. So the Secret Service held their fire, exactly as any law enforcement officers should do.
Arresting him when he reached the guards in the building is exactly the right thing to do for a misdemeanor. Presumably the guards at the door had plenty of back-up if it turned out he was armed or otherwise more than they could handle.
The "they screwed up" crowd is the the same people desperately trying to make us terrified of everything. They should calm the fuck down, change their pants, and realize they need some psychological help for their massive cowardice.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)This is a guy who, essentially, ran across a lawn. An important person's lawn, granted, but to close off access and curtail freedoms because some nutcase violated the "don't walk on the grass" policy? Crazier than a guy on the White House lawn.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)isolated from the public, locked down even. The answer to what happened with the two fence jumpers is to institute a security zone around the White House that goes beyond already established boundaries.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Make the fence taller plus much harder to climb/get over.
Crossed laser sensors
Motion sensors at fence, ground
...and other things I can't think of....
The way they want to change the whole setup is overkill.
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)Notwithstanding, even if the President was not there, security was lax!