Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 782 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We're going to need more cameras. (Original Post)
rug
Sep 2014
OP
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)1. Good thing the ceiling is as high as it is.
Is it 1984 yet?
rug
(82,333 posts)3. This one's at JFK airport.
And that's before the alleged ISIS travelers.
malthaussen
(17,193 posts)2. I'd love to know the rationale for that.
That is friggin' crazed.
-- Mal
rug
(82,333 posts)4. I'm surprised there's not one pointing straight up.
A gap in their security!
malthaussen
(17,193 posts)6. Well, maybe there are some on the roof.
But that looks like a hollow pillar, I hope there are cameras inside.
-- Mal
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)5. There's your DHS budget right there
tecelote
(5,122 posts)7. Is this about security or profit?
Looks a bit redundant for security. They're usually more precise. This is business.