Do you still believe the stated objectives of these wars?

[whatchamacallit]

(Provided you ever did)

9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes - What's questionable about continuous war against a morphing cattle call of existential threats in an oil rich part of the world?
	0 (0%)
	Yes - The government has never lied about this before
	0 (0%)
	Yes - Because Obama
	0 (0%)
	Yes - Did you not hear them say existential? "We're talking EXISTENTIAL, man!"
	0 (0%)
	No - And I implore my compatriots to please wake the fuck up!
	9 (100%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[tularetom]

1. What do you mean, "still"?

I'm pretty sure I never did believe in them, but it's hard to keep up with what the latest threat is. It's like they keep trying new ones until they find one that actually holds up.

[whatchamacallit]

4. Try to see the dilemma for the architects of perpetual war

If you stick with one enemy for too long you start to look like a loser because you can't beat them, but if you change it up you are winning over and over and over...

[raccoon]

2. I say you should never believe the stated objective of any wars.

Any nation is going to come up with a good-sounding reason for war, which is never the REAL reason.

[YoungDemCA]

9. Of course they will

Honesty and politics-domestic or international-have never gone together.

[leftstreet]

3. Not just No, but HELL No! n/t

[CJCRANE]

5. It's simple. We must help the rebels. And we must fight the rebels.

[Vincardog]

6. What WAR? Has Congress acted?

[whatchamacallit]

10. You know, our unwar wars n/t

[KamaAina]

7. That implies that I once did.

[YoungDemCA]

8. Which wars?

There are several.

[woo me with science]

11. Corporate money, wall to wall war propaganda.