General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIncome chart - disgusting and troubling
Note the downward/upward trend only broken (albeit slightly) during the Clinton presidency.
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Stuff revolutions are made from
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)J_J_
(1,213 posts)These 'people' need to be forced to explain exactly how they will pay for it.
Last time they blamed all their wasteful spending and the debt created on poor, disabled, unemployed people.
These greedy bastards have no shame.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... income tax rate that would last as long as the U.S. was involved in war, so that those at the top the benefit the most from war spending would PAY FOR IT DAMMIT!
And perhaps making it so that it would scale back to a lower top end tax break if we didn't have war would provide them incentive to have our industrial markets make bigger investments in areas not associated with war, and hopefully build industry that GROWS OUR COUNTRY and its own citizens' well being instead of destroying other countries and its citizenry's well being!
The big question is how would you put in a proper threshold to decide when we are at war or not. Probably can't do it for every action the government takes and at times does just to protect itself in an emergency action, but make it so that the military industrial complex can't find ways to work around it too.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)years out, like the R's did with the Post Office pensions.
Sound good to me!
Once we get the tax, we never repeal it. Kind of like the Bush tax cuts in reverse.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... But I'm thinking by having an "extra" bracket addition when we are at war will serve to provide more incentive to stop the military industrial complex in its tracks by putting in place disincentives towards investments in their businesses. That is ALSO a good goal in addition to having more tax money in the government paid for by the rich.
And then also, if the Republicans continue with their lines that we can only allocate money if we find some way to pay for it for other programs we like, then we can throw back that this in effect would be exactly be what we're doing for THEIR infatuation with war spending and NOT PAYING FOR IT! By tying a tax increase on those who profit from it directly to whether we have war expenditures or not, will punch them in the mouth and say, you asked for it you got it BUD! You spend it, you pay for it!
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Two problems:
#1 - I don't want a new war, so my ideal budget for it is zero.
#2 - The real issue that needs to be addressed is the income side, and why the elites are making massive gains while everyone else is making massive losses. Taxing the gains doesn't stop anyone else from suffering the losses.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)I think everyone who is making money off of this war happen ought to find their bills unpaid, as a lesson to future war profiteer aspirants.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)then of course, may as well get the money from the same folks it's going to, there's some measure of justice in that.
But what I'd really like to see here is the war-for-profit game ended completely. It has been relentless and endless all my life, and I do not look forward to having it continue for the remainder.
I want to see the United States at peace during my lifetime, and all I've seen is war, and run-ups to war. Enough already!
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)mb999
(89 posts)that should about cover the cost for the wars
Rod Beauvex
(564 posts)Everywhere.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Republicans love misery. They think it builds character (in others).
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)I don't see there is any choice left but revolution. Just haven't a clue how to go about it.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)We do that by outlawing campaign contributions and enacting Publicly Funded Federal, State, and Local Elections (PFE's). We will have to organize and protest on a massive scale, making it an American issue instead of a Republican/Democrat one. This wouldn't be easy considering what they did to OWS, especially since they are prepared. This is why they militarized the police!
marym625
(17,997 posts)I am game.
It's time to stop talking about it and do it.
Working on something and if I can get it to work it might.help.
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)For this Fall during the midterms. I wanted to have signs showing what the candidates have raised and asking them what did they have to do in return for all of that money? Wanted to have them out side local TV stations to make it low hanging fruit for reporters.
Bernie Sanders said this is his #1 issue so we finally have a national candidate who could lead the movement. This is the issue of our time and will determine if we can address climate change any time soon. It would also solve most of our problems and reverse a lot of the partisanship that has been intentionally ramped up. They know that dividing the country and having us blame each other will keep us from recognizing who is really the problem.
I stupidly thought that I could get a lot of people here at DU to help organize, spread the word, and hit the streets. All I got was crickets! I posted like a fiend, but maybe it was my approach. For whatever reason people here ignored me for the most part. I usually got a couple of people to agree, that was it.
Let me know what you have, you have got my interests piqued!
marym625
(17,997 posts)I am sorry you got that response. I posted something the other day about doing something and not one reply.
I will for sure let you know if I am able to do this. I hope I can.
Yeah, this has to be an all out protest, forget party and think country, or nothing will change
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)black men left and right, the new war, same as the old war, the growing inequality, Congressional gridlock and hyper partisanship, and all of the rest it seems to be growing exponentially!
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)That means two extra yachts this year! We can thank Reagan for destroying decades of growth of the middle class, for making sure the wealthy have the game rigged in their favor.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Americans It takes no rocket scientist to understand that this trend is NOT sustainable.
Who is going to take the first effective steps to reverse it? And how will it be done?
If this condition is simply ignored until the laws of physics step in, it will be far too late for life on Earth.
My guess is that 90% of America's adult population understands the gravity of the problem. But, I'm afraid that most see the situation as too far gone to be able to stop it. If so, I think that they are incorrect. This trend could be reversed before it's too late.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The same M$M that is a wholly owned subsidiary of our 1% Oligarchs.
If you want evidence of this, look no further than the recent run-up to
bombing Syria & Iraq, and how public opinion was hyped to deliberately
spike in favor of war, by talking heads beating war drums 23/7 about
how scary and invincible the dreaded ISIS really is. All within the span
of a few weeks. <--THIS is what is scary to me.
OR you might remember a movement called Occupy Wall Street, that
was dedicated to getting the message out, about income & wealth
inequality, and how that message was distorted and tamped down by
the same M$M, and then the Boys in Blue came to finish the job.
I think Chris Hedges is correct in his assessment that "they" have already
"won": they have all the treasure and all the guns, and have successfully
"hired 1/2 of the workers to kill the other half", to quote Railroad tycoon
Jay Gould:
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Regarding my 90% figure, it was just a whimsical guess and certainly could be way off.
pansypoo53219
(20,955 posts)and what did we get for his tax cuts for the top? when will the gnewz give up pimping for tinkle down????
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)We must start teaching our children that war and killing is always the wrong action!
We need to begin teaching our children that withholding resources from another is stealing, and stealing is always a wrong action.
We must teach our children effective non-violent conflict resolution.
We must begin now to restructure our society away from a pyramid shape to a horizontally equilateral structure.
We must let go of our own hatreds and prejudices, put in their places cooperation and kindness.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I notice that from 2009-2012 the top 10% received close to 120 percent of the distribution of wealth. That's like giving 12 slices of pie from a 10-slice pie.
In her published document, there is a slightly different chart.
https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/shared/round_table_discussion-pavlina_tcherneva.pdf
It looks like this originally came from a MotherJones blog. http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/09/rich-are-getting-richer-part-millionth
Which Kevin Drum wrote.
I also noticed that the reference to the source misspells the word "calculations".
It's just a little loosey-goosey.
stage left
(2,961 posts)for the depressing truth.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)out of government bailout money? While "main street" was left to fend for itself?
This is the result of all of that.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)depressing and disgusting.
Initech
(100,038 posts)Nearly all of our economic woes can be traced back to him in some way.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Clinton ended "welfare as we know it."
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)the 99% to entice people to invest their retirement monies in the stock market. We were seeded startup funds then for a period of time. After a bit, the new and uneducated investors in the market began to be fleeced. Bill Clinton sold the worker out in many ways. If you were savvy and thrifty, you were able to set aside money. Most were not.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)nonexistence.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)mb999
(89 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)That's one of the biggest reasons why we had a middle class prosperity for decades (other than WWII), because business owners, unable to hoard the profits for themselves (otherwise they would be punished by a tax rate of up to 91%) would instead reinvest the profits back into the business, including hiring people. Look at what happened when Reagan dismantled the tax rate system that America had for decades, the plutocracy was resurrected.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Republicans call that time "eight years of hell".
TBF
(32,004 posts)they can't read.
JHB
(37,154 posts)Not the rates, just where the brackets fall, adjusted to 2013 dollars.
Unsurprisingly, as inflation squeezed the distribution downward,* there was never much effort in recent times to reset the bar back into the high zones where it once reached.
*Starting in the 80s, the brackets became indexed for inflation. But everything is built off the 1987 Reagan cuts.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)nt
AzDar
(14,023 posts)mb999
(89 posts)It's becoming useless except for the few. The plutocraps ill gotten wealth needs to be confiscated and redistributed back to the people. This can be done thorough increased taxation of the plutocracy to pay for the expansion of social programs and increasing wages and expanding the influence of labor unions.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)along with lists of the bipartisan behavior that caused it.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)K and R