Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Thu Sep 25, 2014, 06:23 PM Sep 2014

Pro-War, Pro-Israel NY Times Reporter David Brooks Has A Son Serving In The Israeli Defense Forces

David Brooks Reveals His Son Is Serving in the Israeli Army

In a recent interview with Israeli paper Haaretz, New York Times columnist David Brooks revealed that his son was currently serving in the Israel Defense Forces.

According to the Jewish Journal’s translation of the article, Brooks said that his 23-year-old son was a “lone soldier” — i.e., a soldier without any immediate family in Israel — and that he’d joined the service a few months ago:


“‘It’s worrying,’” says Brooks, ‘But every Israeli parent understands this is what the circumstances require. Beyond that, I think children need to take risks after they leave university, and that they need to do something difficult, that involves going beyond their personal limits. Serving in the IDF embodies all of these elements. I couldn’t advise others to do it without acknowledging it’s true for my own family.’”


So far, Brooks hasn’t disclosed his son’s service in any of his Israel-related columns — his most recent one was published on July 28th of this year — and his lack of disclosure has been raising some eyebrows, especially due to the Times’s strict policy on disclosure rules: back in 2010, a watchdog group revealed that the Jerusalem bureau chief of the Times had a son serving in the IDF. Though Bill Keller, at the time the paper’s Editor-in-Chief, had no problem with it, the paper’s ombudsman suggested that the bureau chief be reassigned. “Stepping back, this is what I see: The Times sent a reporter overseas to provide disinterested coverage of one of the world’s most intense and potentially explosive conflicts, and now his son has taken up arms for one side,” he wrote. “Even the most sympathetic reader could reasonably wonder how that would affect the father, especially if shooting broke out.”

http://www.mediaite.com/print/in-interview-david-brooks-reveals-his-son-is-in-the-idf/
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pro-War, Pro-Israel NY Times Reporter David Brooks Has A Son Serving In The Israeli Defense Forces (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 OP
the disclosure issue is minor imho Enrique Sep 2014 #1
Damn...I figured I had a major DU scoop Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 #2
the fact that his son is in the IDF is very interesting Enrique Sep 2014 #3
Yes! It is interesting... Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 #4
does this mean david brooks should be president ? JI7 Sep 2014 #5
God help us. He isn't even a good journalist. jwirr Sep 2014 #6
He's not really a good anything... JHB Sep 2014 #15
America seems to have a pretty Sid and Nancy relationship with Israel. N/T Chathamization Sep 2014 #7
You know! Caretha Sep 2014 #14
What's wrong with the US Military? Kingofalldems Sep 2014 #8
U.S. citizens join the IDF all the time. former9thward Sep 2014 #12
so what? mulsh Sep 2014 #9
Brooks is neither a reporter nor a journalist. At best he is right wing scribe and tool. nt madinmaryland Sep 2014 #10
+1. He's part of an increasingly underwhelming NYT editorial staff. (nt) Paladin Sep 2014 #13
And here I thought David Brooks was a tithing Methodist. Live and learn...n/t monmouth3 Sep 2014 #11

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
1. the disclosure issue is minor imho
Thu Sep 25, 2014, 06:27 PM
Sep 2014

since the entire media, Brooks and everyone else, is on Israel's side anyway.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
3. the fact that his son is in the IDF is very interesting
Thu Sep 25, 2014, 06:32 PM
Sep 2014

I should have said that. I'm just saying the part about the journalistic ethics seems like a stretch to me.

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
14. You know!
Thu Sep 25, 2014, 09:08 PM
Sep 2014

I like your post!! I like it bunches.

It gives me a sense of not everyone is an idiot or gullible.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
9. so what?
Thu Sep 25, 2014, 07:04 PM
Sep 2014

Brooks is among the many reason I stopped taking the Times seriously a number of years ago. I don't care what his progeny do or who he supports.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pro-War, Pro-Israel NY Ti...