Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPro-War, Pro-Israel NY Times Reporter David Brooks Has A Son Serving In The Israeli Defense Forces
David Brooks Reveals His Son Is Serving in the Israeli ArmyIn a recent interview with Israeli paper Haaretz, New York Times columnist David Brooks revealed that his son was currently serving in the Israel Defense Forces.
According to the Jewish Journals translation of the article, Brooks said that his 23-year-old son was a lone soldier i.e., a soldier without any immediate family in Israel and that hed joined the service a few months ago:
Its worrying, says Brooks, But every Israeli parent understands this is what the circumstances require. Beyond that, I think children need to take risks after they leave university, and that they need to do something difficult, that involves going beyond their personal limits. Serving in the IDF embodies all of these elements. I couldnt advise others to do it without acknowledging its true for my own family.
So far, Brooks hasnt disclosed his sons service in any of his Israel-related columns his most recent one was published on July 28th of this year and his lack of disclosure has been raising some eyebrows, especially due to the Timess strict policy on disclosure rules: back in 2010, a watchdog group revealed that the Jerusalem bureau chief of the Times had a son serving in the IDF. Though Bill Keller, at the time the papers Editor-in-Chief, had no problem with it, the papers ombudsman suggested that the bureau chief be reassigned. Stepping back, this is what I see: The Times sent a reporter overseas to provide disinterested coverage of one of the worlds most intense and potentially explosive conflicts, and now his son has taken up arms for one side, he wrote. Even the most sympathetic reader could reasonably wonder how that would affect the father, especially if shooting broke out.
http://www.mediaite.com/print/in-interview-david-brooks-reveals-his-son-is-in-the-idf/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 1400 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pro-War, Pro-Israel NY Times Reporter David Brooks Has A Son Serving In The Israeli Defense Forces (Original Post)
Cali_Democrat
Sep 2014
OP
America seems to have a pretty Sid and Nancy relationship with Israel. N/T
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#7
Brooks is neither a reporter nor a journalist. At best he is right wing scribe and tool. nt
madinmaryland
Sep 2014
#10
And here I thought David Brooks was a tithing Methodist. Live and learn...n/t
monmouth3
Sep 2014
#11
Enrique
(27,461 posts)1. the disclosure issue is minor imho
since the entire media, Brooks and everyone else, is on Israel's side anyway.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)2. Damn...I figured I had a major DU scoop
Thanks for being such a wet blanket...
Enrique
(27,461 posts)3. the fact that his son is in the IDF is very interesting
I should have said that. I'm just saying the part about the journalistic ethics seems like a stretch to me.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)4. Yes! It is interesting...
Especially considering articles like this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024851364
JI7
(89,244 posts)5. does this mean david brooks should be president ?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)6. God help us. He isn't even a good journalist.
JHB
(37,158 posts)15. He's not really a good anything...
...except maybe suck-up.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)7. America seems to have a pretty Sid and Nancy relationship with Israel. N/T
Caretha
(2,737 posts)14. You know!
I like your post!! I like it bunches.
It gives me a sense of not everyone is an idiot or gullible.
Kingofalldems
(38,444 posts)8. What's wrong with the US Military?
Is he too good for that or something?
former9thward
(31,970 posts)12. U.S. citizens join the IDF all the time.
Has nothing to do with the U.S. military.
mulsh
(2,959 posts)9. so what?
Brooks is among the many reason I stopped taking the Times seriously a number of years ago. I don't care what his progeny do or who he supports.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)10. Brooks is neither a reporter nor a journalist. At best he is right wing scribe and tool. nt
Paladin
(28,246 posts)13. +1. He's part of an increasingly underwhelming NYT editorial staff. (nt)
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)11. And here I thought David Brooks was a tithing Methodist. Live and learn...n/t