General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 3 biggest myths about pornography, debunked by Belle Knox
....
1) Sex work isnt work.
One of the most damaging notions that conservatives and anti-sex work feminists spread about sex work is the idea that it is not a legitimate form of work. By superimposing a pre-conceived moral landscape onto the field of sex work, these cultural actors portray sex work as an illegitimate form of labor that is only necessary in an evil and/or a patriarchal world.
....
2) Emotional connection and sex have to go hand in hand.
Not only do we live in a culture that still considers sex to be the emotional endpoint of a traditional romantic trajectory, we also associate women with emotion to such a degree that it seems inconceivable that a woman could have sex without intense emotional investment. Slut-shaming, in part, functions to reinforce the idea that women should only want to have sex within the confines of a romantic relationship with a man.
....
3) Porn performers cant be empowered if they have emotional trauma.
Those who oppose sex work often cite statistics about the number of women working in the porn industry who have a history of rape or child sexual abuse as evidence that porn performers enter the industry as wounded victims whose history of abuse has led them to make poor choices.
As Slate reports, however, rates of past sexual abuse among female porn performers arent significantly higher than the female population at large, we just tend not to ask insurance agents and mainstream actresses about molestation in the media in the same invasive way that we do with porn performers.
Salon
msongs
(67,441 posts)Archae
(46,345 posts)Lighting, filming, and so on.
He did tell me most of the time, women in front of the cameras were fairly bright, while most of the guys in front of the camera were dumb as a bag of hammers.
All the way up to John Holmes, I think even George Bush was smarter than what Bill described of John Holmes.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Weird how that works...
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)and I am hardly surprised by what you were told.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)And John Holmes was just an awful human being.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I tell them "don't like it, don't watch it. That works for me." I don't like porn and haven't watched any in probably 20 years, but I can't stand people who think they are entitled to tell consenting adults what to do or watch in privacy.
An interesting excerpt from the article:
With porn, Weeks argues, everything is on my terms. I can say no whenever I want to. I can do what I want to. I can do what I dont want to. Im in control. I like the assertive, passionate person that Im becoming because of porn.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm not opposed to porn in theory but I dislike a whole lot of how many parts of the industry run.
eridani
(51,907 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)That's really not the issue here. Ms. Weeks wasn't trafficked; she chose to work in this profession.
Yes, human traffickers are the scum of the earth, whether they bring in people for porn, prostitution, laundromats, or restaurants. They should be locked away from decent people.