Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:14 PM Sep 2014

How the 0.00003 Percent Lives




Meet your friendly neighborhood billionaire. He’s a 63-year-old married guy. He’s got just over $3 billion in the bank, including $600 million in cash. He made his own money on Wall Street. He went to Penn. He loves sports. That basic composite comes from Wealth-X and UBS’s new “census” of the world’s 2,325 billionaires, giving a rare view into how the 0.00003 percent lives. And they live very, very well.

Their ranks are growing, their fortunes swelling. They now control about 4 percent of the world’s wealth. That’s $7.3 trillion, enough to take Apple private twelve times over, say, or to pay off the entirety of the United States’ debt to China.

Our representative American billionaire made the bulk of his money in his 40s and 50s in finance. About half of his money is in private investments, like equity in his own firm. He keeps about 20 percent in cash, and a delicious 5 percent in real estate and “luxury assets,” presumably tamed jaguars and yachts with helicopter landing pads. He owns four houses, each worth about $20 million.

His wealth has grown in the past year, but he has not beaten the overall market. In part, that is because he holds so much cash, given that interest rates are so low and questions about the strength of the recovery remain. But there are other reasons, too.

more

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/how-the-000003-percent-lives.html
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the 0.00003 Percent Lives (Original Post) n2doc Sep 2014 OP
Time to dust off and oil up the guillotine. hobbit709 Sep 2014 #1
Yesterday. hifiguy Sep 2014 #31
Their clothes, glasses and her hat probably cost more than my house. BlueJazz Sep 2014 #2
Not to mention the cosmetic surgeries and enhacements Cleita Sep 2014 #3
Recommend Read... Reminds me of this... KoKo Sep 2014 #4
Isn't it interesting how the breeze is always making the woman's hair look naturally wind blown lunatica Sep 2014 #6
Internationally acclaimed barrister Amal Alamuddin marries an acto uppityperson Sep 2014 #14
Hey! He's a job creator! lunatica Sep 2014 #5
Below minimum wage, though? nt kelliekat44 Sep 2014 #15
I wasn't being serious lunatica Sep 2014 #17
I was nt kelliekat44 Sep 2014 #20
Well in that case, yes it would be below minimum wage lunatica Sep 2014 #30
Clooney didn't make his money at my expense except when I patronized his movies ... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2014 #7
George is no where near the 0.0003% club n2doc Sep 2014 #8
I know...But Poor George was brought into the conversation. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2014 #10
Pet peeve I have about prop 13 here in California and those Cleita Sep 2014 #9
in general justabob Sep 2014 #19
It would appear that they are attracted to younger looking women too Sopkoviak Sep 2014 #11
The term "trophy wife" is in common use, so I think people have noticed. nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2014 #13
Or perhaps their girlfrieds and wives just get a lot of work done. hughee99 Sep 2014 #22
I feel like we are playing a real-life Monopoly game corkhead Sep 2014 #12
No matter how any of lives...we all go to the grave the same way...and our stuff is left behind for kelliekat44 Sep 2014 #16
What if there was no stock market? moondust Sep 2014 #18
Before there was a stock market, there was still this kind of wealth. hughee99 Sep 2014 #21
But it used to be much better balanced and much more just. moondust Sep 2014 #23
Yes, but during that time, there was a stock market. hughee99 Sep 2014 #25
There was a stock market. moondust Sep 2014 #26
.... SammyWinstonJack Sep 2014 #24
How many members of Congress does he own? nt valerief Sep 2014 #27
He owns the guy that owns a few Congress critters. Rex Sep 2014 #29
He doesn't have to make money from labor like the average millionaire. Rex Sep 2014 #28

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
3. Not to mention the cosmetic surgeries and enhacements
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:26 PM
Sep 2014

if that woman is in fact his wife and closer to his age than she looks.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Recommend Read... Reminds me of this...
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:26 PM
Sep 2014

George Clooney with his new Bride who is a human rights attorney.

Although their wedding extravaganza makes me wonder .....

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
6. Isn't it interesting how the breeze is always making the woman's hair look naturally wind blown
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:32 PM
Sep 2014

while the men's hair is perfect? That's what happens when you're one of the jet setting beautiful people.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
14. Internationally acclaimed barrister Amal Alamuddin marries an acto
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 02:34 PM
Sep 2014
http://www.thebusinesswomanmedia.com/amal-alamuddin-marries-actor/
Amal Alamuddin, a 36 year old London-based dual-qualified English barrister and New York litigation attorney who has long been a high-profile figure in international refugee and human rights law has gone against the trend for professional women in her field and married… an actor.

Amal is an educated and successful career woman we’ve long admired. The high-flying barrister has notched up many career highs, including representing the controversial WikiLeaks whistleblower Julian Assange, and also has multilingual fluency in English, French and Arabic.

Amal attended St. Hugh’s College, Oxford University, earning her BA/LLB and receiving the Exhibitioner, Shrigley Award. She also attended New York University School of Law earning her LLM and receiving the Jack J. Katz Memorial Award. A true testament to her character is her decision to find time to serve on the expert panel of Preventing Sexual Violence Initiative (formed by UK Foreign Secretary William Hague) to gather evidence of sexual crimes committed in conflict zones.
(clip)

He’s probably a nice man, but seems to be a bit clingy, as since she met him it’s hard to find a photo or footage of Amal without him hanging around in the background. We only hope he doesn’t hold her back from conquering the world. We think this George Clooney fellow has scored big time....

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
5. Hey! He's a job creator!
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:27 PM
Sep 2014

With 4 houses worth millions each he's got an army of servants in each one, ready to cook, clean, drive and tend the vast gardens. and someone has to drive the boats and fly the helicopters and jets. And someone has to protect him and his stuff ya know. That's hundreds, if not thousands of jobs! Why would anyone be upset with that?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
30. Well in that case, yes it would be below minimum wage
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 05:06 PM
Sep 2014

We'd go back a Century when the entire family had to work 16 hours a day for starvation wages. Back to the days when there was nothing to fall back on like Social Security, minimum wage laws, child labor laws, unions or birth control. We'd be living in the 2nd Gilded Age, which is exactly what they want. If it was up to them, that's exactly what would happen.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
7. Clooney didn't make his money at my expense except when I patronized his movies ...
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:35 PM
Sep 2014

Clooney didn't make his money at my expense except when I patronize his movies which I usually enjoy.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. I know...But Poor George was brought into the conversation.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:45 PM
Sep 2014

Plus from all accounts he's a totally unpretentious guy ...

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. Pet peeve I have about prop 13 here in California and those
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 01:41 PM
Sep 2014

four houses. Every time I suggest we should fix prop 13, all the property owners get really pissed at me because they only pay 1% in property taxes. Fine. Leave the single family home alone, however, hotel sized mansions and the other three homes those billionaires own should pay 5%. Many of them are from out of state or foreign countries. Beverly Hills should be renamed Little Arabia for all the rich sheiks that own multiple homes there.

Before prop 13, property taxes in California paid for a free university education for our kids. It kept the homeless off the streets and got them the hospital care they needed. It paid welfare benefits for the poor and elderly. We could go back to that by making the likes of McCain, Romney, Oprah and others, who own properties in California but don't pay the taxes they should, pay for the privilege.

justabob

(3,069 posts)
19. in general
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 06:34 PM
Sep 2014

I think it would be good if those gigantic homes were taxed at a higher rate, period.... over a certain square footage or whatever. I drive around my city and I see these monster houses being built... 5000 sf, 10000 sf, even bigger in the suburbs..... and it is crazy and such a waste. It really is the guilded age all over again, in so many ways. These houses are monuments to everything that is wrong in our contemporary society.

 

Sopkoviak

(357 posts)
11. It would appear that they are attracted to younger looking women too
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 02:04 PM
Sep 2014

Someone should do a study of this phenomenon.

Maybe post it here when it's done.

Probably nobody would be interested though.

Just a thought.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
22. Or perhaps their girlfrieds and wives just get a lot of work done.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 07:10 PM
Sep 2014

If you have enough money, you can look like you're 30 when you turn 60.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
12. I feel like we are playing a real-life Monopoly game
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 02:06 PM
Sep 2014

where they own all of the properties, have hotels on all of them and have the privilege of not having to throw the dice like us unwashed rabble. No "go to jail, do not pass go", community chest, or chance for them. They just get to sit back and collect money from the rest of us schlubs.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
16. No matter how any of lives...we all go to the grave the same way...and our stuff is left behind for
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 02:47 PM
Sep 2014

another.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
18. What if there was no stock market?
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 05:04 PM
Sep 2014

Closed down, boarded up? Outlawed like gambling casinos before Native American casinos and riverboat gambling?

And all the profits went to the people who spend their lives keeping things running--management and staff?

Nobody home in bed or out on the golf course getting grotesquely wealthy off the work of others simply because they own shares?

No one gutting pay and benefits, moving jobs offshore, evading taxes, buying up a Congress of deregulators, inventing tax inversions and other profitability tricks designed to impress stock markets and boost their stock price so the guys with all the shares can get much, much wealthier?

What if?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
21. Before there was a stock market, there was still this kind of wealth.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 07:08 PM
Sep 2014

The world has never been a "you only get what you work for" kind of place. n/t

moondust

(19,972 posts)
23. But it used to be much better balanced and much more just.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 07:46 PM
Sep 2014

After WWII and before Reagan era financialization of the economy and "greed is good."



hughee99

(16,113 posts)
25. Yes, but during that time, there was a stock market.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 10:07 PM
Sep 2014

Your point runs counter to your first statement.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
26. There was a stock market.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 10:39 PM
Sep 2014

But it was a different animal before financialization led to all sorts of rapacious profitability tricks intended solely to boost stock prices on behalf of shareholders without concern for the social consequences.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
29. He owns the guy that owns a few Congress critters.
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 02:05 AM
Sep 2014

So rich, that labor is no longer required to make capital.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
28. He doesn't have to make money from labor like the average millionaire.
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 02:03 AM
Sep 2014

He has so much money and assets, he can make money off of money and assets. No labor needed. He is King Bitcoin.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the 0.00003 Percent L...