General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou Don’t “Have Nothing to Hide”: How Privacy Breaches are Quietly Controlling You
http://www.salon.com/2014/09/28/you_dont_have_nothing_to_hide_how_privacy_breaches_are_quietly_controlling_you/SUNDAY, SEP 28, 2014 10:00 AM EDT
You dont have nothing to hide: How privacy breaches are quietly controlling you
Government data collection is scary for many reasons. But least understood: what it does to our personal creativity
FALGUNI A. SHETH
Edward Snowdens leaks reminded us about the extent to which the notion of privacy is no longer our own. The last few years have brought home the fact that between the telecommunication companies, street surveillance cameras, tollbooth cameras and EZ-pass, and corporations such as Google, Apple, Microsoft and Facebook, virtually no aspect of our lives is immune from the intrusive watch of some agency of the state.
- snip -
Another reason why privacy is important, as Greenwald and many others, including the philosopher Hannah Arendt, have argued, is that privacy is crucial to personal exploration, creativity, dissent those interests and thoughts that reflect the complexity of human beings and their ability to flourish and lead meaningful lives. But as we also know, creativity and dissent can be disruptive to the smooth functioning of society making the lives of bureaucrats and autocratic politicians much harder because their authority would be constantly challenged. As Professor Roger Berkowitz, Director of Bard Colleges Hannah Arendt Center, suggests in an excellent post on the importance of privacy for Hannah Arendt,
- snip -
Leading a meaningful life also, and often, means leading a complicated, unpredictable, undecipherable but not necessarily a criminal or immoral life. I may be having an affair outside of my marriage but why should this fact be up for scrutiny by the state or even my neighbors? Why should anyone else judge those actions except for myself and my marital partner (and maybe its OK with him/her). How does my calling someone on the Pakistan/India border tell the NSA anything interesting about me unless they are also making huge, overgeneralized judgments based on my ethnic and religious identity? Not only independent thinking, but unruly (read: brown, black, Muslim) appearances are also enough to rouse suspicion. Recently we saw this through the Intercepts story about the FBI and NSA surveillance of five prominent Muslims, from professors to Republican Party members, to the head of the Council on Islamic-American Relations (CAIR).
But spying isnt necessarily just about obtaining information. Surveillance is about gaining control. Collecting information on you whether by the NSA, health insurance companies, the NYPD or a hacker is an effort to predict your behavior and then to take steps to box it in, to stop you from acting in ways that are nonconforming (but not necessarily criminal), or to profit from your wayward behavior. We see this constantly: Credit reporting agencies collect all sorts of data about you your spending habits, how many credit cards you have, how prompt you are in paying those bills, how many times youve been late, what kind of disputes youve had with other parties to whom you owe money. The official story for this kind of data accumulation is that they are attempting to assess what kind of credit risk you are. The problem with this is that their inferences about your behavior are often just plain wrong, if not dumb; having had a credit card dispute because Ive refused to pay a certain charge does not necessarily make me irresponsible. It might instead mean that Im likely to challenge charges that I think are unfair or wrong which of course is a negative behavior in the eyes of a mortgage company or an employer (since we now know that employers regularly collect credit information about prospective employees) the idea that I might challenge inaccuracies or unfairness might mean that I have an obstreperous personality that isnt actually conducive to the go along and get along personalities that employers and mortgage companies value. So that means a higher mortgage interest rate for me.
Similarly, the NSAs collection of information about my online life whether Im visiting the sites of fundamentalist imams or calling someone monthly who lives near the Pakistan/India border, is also an attempt to assess my politics and what kind of company I keep in order to decide whether I am a so-called threat to the national security of the United States. But surfing those websites or calling someone near the Pakistan/India border tells the NSA very little about my thinking process: For one thing, its often difficult to know exactly why someone is doing something unless you can actually get inside their heads (Shhh, dont give the NSA any ideas). Maybe Im visiting the site because Im doing a report about Islam, or because Im skeptical about the news stories I come across that tell me that the imam whose sermons are on that site is a terrorist, or because Im looking for spiritual meaning. None of these mean that I will or want to become a terrorist but they do mean that I am doing something that the state finds suspicious, or that they dont want me to do.
- snip -
And here is where it gets interesting: When someone says I have nothing to hide, this is another way of saying, I am not the kind of person that the government is looking for. I am neither suspicious nor a criminal. I am not someone who breaks the law.
But that translation only works if you have never been the object of false suspicion...
MORE[p]
hunter
(38,311 posts)Fade to white... I'm lost.
Wella
(1,827 posts)Thanks for posting this.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)hunter
(38,311 posts)But it's okay now. It's on them.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Heaven knows the Founding Fathers had some glaring flaws, but in some areas they demonstrated extraordinary wisdom and foresight. We ignore them at our peril.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)think I should sign up for this or that on-line thing, and dismiss my unwillingness by saying, "Oh, you don't have any privacy anyway."
Maybe they don't, but I'm still a bit careful about what I want to let out there about myself. That's why I never click on a "like" button ever.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Ask your doctor.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)But not surprised you don't get it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The NSA can have all the copies it wants.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)greathornedlizard
(1 post)Here's some more information about this petition:
Fire FBI Director James Comey
FBI Director James Comey has indicated that he believes that Americans
cherish privacy so that we may engage in lawless pursuits.
This is reprehensible and totalitarian. He should find another line of work.
http://wh.gov/iikeg
Started today, we need 150 signatures to have it published on Whitehouse.gov
Let's protect our right to privacy!
20score
(4,769 posts)but, not every person thinks.)
This article should be read by all.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom